journal article·2021-03-26Open access

Comparative Performance Evaluation of Commercial Packing Materials for Malodorants Abatement in Biofiltration

Raquel Lebrero, Elisa Rodríguez, María Collantes, Carlos De Juan, Geir Norden, Kim Rosenbom, Raúl Muñoz

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 7

Abstract

Packing materials used in biofiltration of gaseous pollutants represent a key design parameter, as a proper selection might not only determine the adequate performance of the system but also its cost-effectiveness. This study systematically assessed and compared the performance of a conventional plastic carrier with that of two novel clay-based materials from SAINT GOBAIN for the abatement of a model odorous stream composed of H2S, methylmercaptan and toluene. The packing materials were tested in biotrickling filters, biofilters and a two-phase biotrickling filter. SAINT GOBAIN materials exhibited a higher adsorption potential under abiotic conditions, a higher buffer capacity and a superior performance compared to conventional plastic rings when implemented in biotrickling filters operating at gas residence times as low as 7.5 s. Among the materials tested in biofilters, Filtralite Air AC supported almost complete H2S and toluene removals at a gas residence time of 20 s, while successfully eliminating methylmercaptan at values of ~80%. Interestingly, under most of the conditions tested, clay-based materials also showed comparable pressure drop values than those of plastic rings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Odor and Emission Control Technologies · Vehicle emissions and performance · Industrial Gas Emission Control

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Sustainable Processes, University of Valladolid, Mergelina s/n., 47011 Valladolid, Spain

SAINT GOBAIN, LECA INTERNATIONAL, Robert Jacobsens Vej 62A, 2300 Københavny, Denmark

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Survey of the effect of odour impact on communities10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.016 ↗
2. Selection of odour removal technologies in wastewater treatment plants: A guideline based on Life Cycle Assessment10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.011 ↗
3. Tsagarakis, K., and Stamatelatou, K. (2015). Odour abatement technologies in WWTPs: Energy and economic efficiency. Sewage Treatment Plants: Economic Evaluation of Innovative Technologies for Energy Efficiency, IWA Publishing.10.2166/9781780405025 ↗
4. Abatement of odorant compounds in one- and two-phase biotrickling filters under steady and transient conditions10.1007/s00253-012-4247-1 ↗
5. A study of the impact of particle size and adsorption phenomena in a compost-based biological filter10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00397-4 ↗
6. Lebrero, R., Muñoz, R., Villaverde, S., and Hung, Y.-T. (2012). Air Biofiltration Applied to Odor Treatment, World Scientific Publlishing.10.1142/9789814327701_0004 ↗
7. Belgiorno, V., Naddeo, V., and Zarra, T. (2012). Strategies for Odour Control. Odour Impact Assessment Handbook, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118481264 ↗
8. Effect of Flow Rate, Concentration and Transient—State Operations on the Performance of a Biofilter Treating Xylene Vapors10.1007/s11270-009-0282-7 ↗
9. Literature review of air pollution control biofilters and biotrickling filters for odor and volatile organic compound removal10.1002/ep.10077 ↗
10. Janni, K.A., Maier, W.J., Kuehn, T.H., Yang, C.-H., Bridges, B.B., Vesley, D., and Nellis, M.A. (2001, January 1). Evaluation of Biofiltration of Air—An Innovative Air Pollution Control Technology. Proceedings of the ASHRAE Winter Meeting CD, Technical and Symposium Papers, Atlanta, GA, USA.
11. Performance of a compost and biochar packed biofilter for gas-phase hydrogen sulfide removal10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.052 ↗
12. Evaluation of full-scale biofilter media performance10.1002/ep.670180317 ↗
13. Devinny, J., Deshusses, M., and Webster, T. (2017). Biofiltration for Air Pollution Control, Taylor & Francis Group.10.1201/9781315138275 ↗
14. Characterization and biofiltration of a real odorous emission from wastewater treatment plant sludge10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.038 ↗
15. Comparative assessment of a biofilter, a biotrickling filter and a hollow fiber membrane bioreactor for odor treatment in wastewater treatment plants10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.055 ↗
16. Inert filter media for the biofiltration of waste gases—Characteristics and biomass control10.1023/A:1021240500817 ↗
17. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies10.1093/nar/gks808 ↗
18. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026 ↗
19. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools10.1093/nar/gks1219 ↗
20. A comparative assessment of biofiltration and activated sludge diffusion for odour abatement10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.090 ↗
21. Biofiltration of Air: A Review10.1080/07388550590935814 ↗
22. Federation, W.E. (2008). Odor Control. Operation of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants, McGraw-Hill Education.
23. Volumetric mass transfer coefficients characterising VOC absorption in water/silicone oil mixtures10.1016/j.cej.2013.01.102 ↗
24. Timmis, K.N., McGenity, T.J., van der Meer, J.R., and de Lorenzo, V. (2010). Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-77587-4 ↗
25. Biodegradation of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and o-xylene by the bacterium Mycobacterium cosmeticum byf-410.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.06.043 ↗
26. Torres, F.A.T. (2014). Addendum to the Toxicological Profile for Methyl Mercaptan, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
27. Biological removal of methanethiol from gas and water streams by using Thiobacillus thioparus: Investigation of biodegradability and optimization of sulphur production10.1080/09593330.2014.881404 ↗
28. Bacterial community analysis of a gas-phase biotrickling filter for biogas mimics desulfurization through the rRNA approach10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.05.019 ↗
29. Tu, X., Xu, M., Li, J., Li, E., Feng, R., Zhao, G., Huang, S., and Guo, J. (2019). Enhancement of using combined packing materials on the removal of mixed sulfur compounds in a biotrickling filter and analysis of microbial communities. BMC Biotechnol., 19.10.1186/s12896-019-0540-8 ↗
30. Reclassification of some species of Thiobacillus to the newly designated genera Acidithiobacillus gen. nov., Halothiobacillus gen. nov. and Thermithiobacillus gen. nov10.1099/00207713-50-2-511 ↗
31. Isolation and characterization of Methanomethylovorans hollandica gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from freshwater sediment, a methylotrophic methanogen able to grow on dimethyl sulfide and methanethiol10.1128/AEM.65.8.3641-3650.1999 ↗
32. Methanethiol degradation in anaerobic bioreactors at elevated pH (8): Reactor performance and microbial community analysis10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.007 ↗
33. Degradation of methanethiol by methylotrophic methanogenic archaea in a lab-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor10.1128/AEM.01133-06 ↗