Impacts of Traverse Speed and Material Thickness on Abrasive Waterjet Contour Cutting of Austenitic Stainless Steel AISI 304L
Source abstract
Abstract
Abrasive water jet machining is a proficient alternative for cutting difficult-to-machine materials with complex geometries, such as austenitic stainless steel 304L (AISI304L). However, due to differences in machining responses for varied material conditions, the abrasive waterjet machining experiences challenges including kerf geometric inaccuracy and low material removal rate. In this study, an abrasive waterjet machining is employed to perform contour cutting of different profiles to investigate the impacts of traverse speed and material thickness in achieving lower kerf taper angle and higher material removal rate. Based on experimental investigation, a trend of decreasing the level of traverse speed and material thickness that results in minimum kerf taper angle values of 0.825° for machining curvature profile and 0.916° for line profiles has been observed. In addition, higher traverse speed and material thickness achieved higher material removal rate in cutting different curvature radii and lengths in line profiles with obtained values of 769.50 mm3/min and 751.5 mm3/min, accordingly. The analysis of variance revealed that material thickness had a significant impact on kerf taper angle and material removal rate, contributing within the range of 69–91% and 62–69%, respectively. In contrast, traverse speed was the least factor measuring within the range of 5–18% for kerf taper angle and 27–36% for material removal rate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Erosion and Abrasive Machining · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Engineering, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Machining of austenitic stainless steels—A review
2. Machinability Studies on Stainless steel by abrasive water jet-Review10.1016/j.matpr.2018.01.079 ↗
3. Waterjet machining and research developments: A review10.1007/s00170-019-03556-x ↗
4. Modern Optimization Techniques for Advanced Machining Processes—A Review10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.175 ↗
5. A study on recycling of abrasives in abrasive water jet machining10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00256-4 ↗
6. Technical-economic evaluation of abrasive recycling in the suspension fine jet process chain10.1007/s00170-019-04651-9 ↗
7. Effect of abrasive type on marble cutting performance of abrasive waterjet10.1007/s12517-019-4475-0 ↗
8. Application of Taguchi design for quality characterization of abrasive water jet machining of TRIP sheet steels10.1007/s00170-011-3815-3 ↗
9. Abrasive Water Jet Machining process: A state of art of review10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.11.030 ↗
10. A review on recent progresses in machining methods based on abrasive water jet machining10.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.373 ↗
11. Research on quality improvement of the cross section cut by abrasive water jet based on secondary cutting10.1007/s00170-018-1935-8 ↗
12. Effect of standoff distance on the kerf characteristic during abrasive water jet machining10.1016/j.rineng.2020.100101 ↗
13. Kavya, J., Keshavamurthy, R., and Kumar, G.P. (2016, January 14–16). Studies on parametric optimization for abrasive water jet machining of Al7075-TiB2 in-situ composite. Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Bangalore, India.10.1088/1757-899X/149/1/012024 ↗
14. Abrasive waterjet cutting of cladded material: Kerf taper and MRR analysis10.1080/10426914.2018.1544710 ↗
15. Exploration on Kerf-angle and surface roughness in abrasive waterjet machining using response surface method10.1007/s40032-017-0366-x ↗
16. A machinability study of mild steel using abrasive water jet machining technology
17. Performance analysis of abrasive water jet machining process for AISI 304 stainless steel
18. Machinability of nickel-based superalloy by abrasive water jet machining10.1080/10426914.2015.1103859 ↗
19. Multi-objective optimization of abrasive waterjet machining process using Jaya algorithm and PROMETHEE Method10.1007/s10845-017-1373-8 ↗
20. Characterization and optimization of Abrasive Water Jet Machining parameters of aluminium/tungsten carbide composites10.1016/j.measurement.2017.11.059 ↗
21. Optimization of Abrasive Water Jet Machining Process Prameters Using Resopnse Surface Method on Inconel-188
22. Khan, M.A., and Gupta, K. (2019, January 9–13). Machinability Studies on Abrasive Water Jet Machining of Low Alloy Steel for Different Thickness. Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Sevastopol, WI, USA.
23. Llanto, J.M., Tolouei-Rad, M., Vafadar, A., and Aamir, M. (2021). Recent Progress Trend on Abrasive Waterjet Cutting of Metallic Materials: A Review. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11083344 ↗
24. Profile cutting on alumina ceramics by abrasive waterjet. Part 1: Experimental investigation10.1243/09544062JMES207A ↗
25. Investigation of the taper of kerfs cut in steels by AWJ10.1007/s00170-014-6578-9 ↗
26. On the modelling of abrasive waterjet cutting10.1007/BF01239612 ↗
27. Multi-objective Optimization of Process Performances when Cutting Carbon Steel with Abrasive Water Jet
28. A key parameter to characterize the kerf profile error generated by abrasive water-jet10.1007/s00170-016-9402-x ↗
29. Improving the quality characteristics of abrasive water jet machining of marble material using multi-objective artificial bee colony algorithm
30. Shape distortion reduction method for abrasive water jet (AWJ) cutting10.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.04.003 ↗
31. Surface integrity analysis of abrasive water jet-cut surfaces of friction stir welded joints10.1007/s00170-016-8776-0 ↗
32. Experimental Investigations on Multiple Responses in Abrasive Waterjet Machining of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.335 ↗
33. Effects of processing parameters on kerf characteristics and surface integrity following abrasive waterjet slotting of Ti6Al4V/CFRP stacks10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.04.024 ↗
34. Machinability of Al2024, Al6061, and Al5083 alloys using multi-hole simultaneous drilling approach10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.07.078 ↗
35. Feasibility of tool configuration and the effect of tool material, and tool geometry in multi-hole simultaneous drilling of Al202410.1007/s00170-020-06151-7 ↗
36. Multi-hole simultaneous drilling of aluminium alloy: A preliminary study and evaluation against one-shot drilling process10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.02.026 ↗
37. Aamir, M., Tu, S., Tolouei-Rad, M., Giasin, K., and Vafadar, A. (2020). Optimization and modeling of process parameters in multi-hole simultaneous drilling using taguchi method and fuzzy logic approach. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13030680 ↗
38. Abrasive water jet machining of Titanium (Ti6Al4V)-CFRP stacks-A semi-analytical modeling approach in the prediction of kerf geometry10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.01.041 ↗
39. Exploring kerf cut by abrasive waterjet10.1007/s00170-017-0467-y ↗