journal article·2020-11-22Open access

Sintering Behavior of a Six-Oxide Silicate Bioactive Glass for Scaffold Manufacturing

Elisa Fiume, Gianpaolo Serino, Cristina Bignardi, Enrica Verné, Francesco Baino

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 22

Abstract

The intrinsic brittleness of bioactive glasses (BGs) is one of the main barriers to the widespread use of three-dimensional porous BG-derived bone grafts (scaffolds) in clinical practice. Among all the available strategies for improving the mechanical properties of BG-based scaffolds, strut densification upon sintering treatments at high temperatures represents a relatively easy approach, but its implementation might lead to undesired and poorly predictable decrease in porosity, mass transport properties and bioactivity resulting from densification and devitrification phenomena occurring in the material upon heating. The aim of the present work was to investigate the sinter-crystallization of a highly bioactive SiO2-P2O5-CaO–MgO–Na2O–K2O glass (47.5B composition) in reference to its suitability for the fabrication of bonelike foams. The thermal behavior of 47.5B glass particles was investigated upon sintering at different temperatures in the range of 600–850 °C by means of combined thermal analyses (differential thermal analysis (DTA) and hot-stage microscopy (HSM)). Then, XRD measurements were carried out to identify crystalline phases developed upon sintering. Finally, porous scaffolds were produced by a foam replica method in order to evaluate the effect of the sintering temperature on the mechanical properties under compression loading conditions. Assessing a relationship between mechanical properties and sintering temperature, or in other words between scaffold performance and fabrication process, is a key step towards the rationale design of optimized scaffolds for tissue repair.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (DIMEAS), Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy

Institute of Materials Physics and Engineering, Department of Applied Science and Technology (DISAT), Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Review of bioactive glass: From Hench to hybrids10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023 ↗
2. Bioglass at 50-A look at Larry Hench’s legacy and bioactive materials10.1515/bglass-2019-0014 ↗
3. Chronology of Bioactive Glass Development and Clinical Applications10.4236/njgc.2013.32011 ↗
4. The story of Bioglass®10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z ↗
5. Bioactive glass: Mechanisms of bone bonding
6. Bioactive Glasses—Structure and Properties10.1002/anie.201405310 ↗
7. The effect of bioactive glasses on enamel remineralization: A systematic review10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.007 ↗
8. Bioactive glass coatings: A review10.1179/1743294410Y.0000000008 ↗
9. Glass-based coatings on biomedical implants: A state-of-the-art review10.1515/bglass-2017-0001 ↗
10. Bioactive Materials Bioactive glass coatings on metallic implants for biomedical applications
11. Dorcemus, D.L., and Nukavarapu, S.P. (2018). Tissue Engineering of Skeletal Tissues. Reference Module in Biomedical Sciences, Elsevier Inc.10.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.00027-1 ↗
12. Hard tissue regeneration using bone substitutes: An update on innovations in materials10.3904/kjim.2015.30.3.279 ↗
13. Bioceramics and Scaffolds: A Winning Combination for Tissue Engineering10.3389/fbioe.2015.00202 ↗
14. 45S5 Bioglass®-derived glass–ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.025 ↗
15. Multifunctional magnetic mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds with a hierarchical pore structure10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.028 ↗
16. Fiume, E., Serino, G., Bignardi, C., Verné, E., and Baino, F. (2019). Bread-derived bioactive porous scaffolds: An innovative and sustainable approach to bone tissue engineering. Molecules, 24.10.3390/molecules24162954 ↗
17. Cunningham, E., Dunne, N.J., Clarke, S.A., and Choi, S.Y. (2011). Comparative Characterisation of 3-D Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds Developed Via Replication of Synthetic Polymer Foams and Natural Marine Sponges. J. Tissue Sci. Eng.10.4172/2157-7552.S1-001 ↗
18. Bioactive Sol—Gel Foams for Tissue Repair Bioactive sol-gel foams for tissue repair10.1002/jbm.1250 ↗
19. Effect of surfactant concentration and composition on the structure and properties of sol-gel-derived bioactive glass foam scaffolds for tissue engineering10.1023/A:1025988301542 ↗
20. Fiume, E., Tulyaganov, D., Ubertalli, G., Verné, E., and Baino, F. (2020). Dolomite-Foamed Bioactive Silicate Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Repair. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13030628 ↗
21. Robocasting of Bioactive SiO2-P2O5-CaO-MgO-Na2O-K2O Glass Scaffolds10.1155/2019/5153136 ↗
22. Additive Manufacturing of Bioactive Glasses and Silicate Bioceramics
23. Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: State of the art and future perspectives10.1016/j.msec.2011.04.022 ↗
24. Improving mechanical properties of 13–93 bioactive glass robocast scaffold by poly (lactic acid) and poly (ε -caprolactone) melt in fi ltration10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.02.025 ↗
25. Three-dimensional, bioactive, biodegradable, polymer-bioactive glass composite scaffolds with improved mechanical properties support collagen synthesis and mineralization of human osteoblast-like cells in vitro10.1002/jbm.a.10399 ↗
26. Effects of P 2 O 5 and sintering temperature on microstructure and mechanical properties of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics10.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.009 ↗
27. Optimizing bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.017 ↗
28. Mechanical properties of bioactive glasses, ceramics, glass-ceramics and composites: State-of-the-art review and future challenges10.1016/j.msec.2019.109895 ↗
29. Structural models of bioactive glasses from molecular dynamics simulations10.1098/rspa.2008.0462 ↗
30. Effect of crystallization on apatite-layer formation of bioactive glass 45S510.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199604)30:4<509::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
31. The effect of crystallization of bioactive bioglass 45S5 on apatite formation and degradation10.1016/j.dental.2013.09.016 ↗
32. Early Stage Reactivity and In Vitro Behavior of Silica-Based Bioactive Glasses and Glass-Ceramics10.1007/s10856-008-3537-8 ↗
33. Fiume, E., Schiavi, A., Orlygsson, G., Bignardi, C., Verné, E., and Baino, F. (2020). Comprehensive assessment of bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffold permeability: Experimental measurements by pressure wave drop, modelling and computed tomography-based analysis. Acta Biomater., in press.10.1016/j.actbio.2020.10.027 ↗
34. Crystallization behavior of SiO 2—P 2 O 5—CaO—MgO—Na 2 O—K 2 O bioactive glass powder10.1515/bglass-2019-0004 ↗
35. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
36. Barberi, J., Baino, F., Fiume, E., Orlygsson, G., Nommeots-Nomm, A., Massera, J., and Verné, E. (2019). Robocasting of SiO2-based bioactive glass scaffolds with porosity gradient for bone regeneration and potential load-bearing applications. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12172691 ↗
37. Bioactive Glass and Glass-Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering10.3390/ma3073867 ↗
38. Mechanical characterization of pore-graded bioactive glass scaffolds produced by robocasting10.1515/bglass-2019-0012 ↗
39. High strength bioactive glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone regeneration10.1007/s10856-008-3605-0 ↗
40. Sintering and crystallization of 45S5 Bioglass ® powder10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.06.035 ↗
41. A two-scale model for simultaneous sintering and crystallization of glass–ceramic scaffolds for tissue engineering10.1016/j.actbio.2008.02.004 ↗
42. Effects of Sintering Temperature on Crystallization and Fabrication of Porous Bioactive Glass Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration10.1038/s41598-017-06337-2 ↗