journal article·2020-09-02Open access

Economic Valuation of Reducing Submerged Marine Debris in South Korea

Se-Jun Jin, Young-Ju Kwon, Seung-Hoon Yoo

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 17

Abstract

Submerged marine debris (SMD) scattered between sea level and the bottom of the sea damages the habitats of marine life and threatens its growth in South Korea. The collection of SMD is more difficult and expensive than that of coastal and floating debris. The government is trying to achieve a 33% reduction in SMD by 2023 by expanding its collection, which requires huge additional investments and additional information about the economic value or benefits of the reduction. This article seeks to conduct an economic valuation of the reduction by employing contingent valuation (CV), which asks people to indicate their willingness to pay (WTP) for the reduction. A dichotomous choice CV survey was undertaken with 1000 households by a professional survey firm through person-to-person interviews during July 2019. Overall, people understood the CV questions well and reported the WTP responses for a hypothetical market successfully created with CV. Although 37.9% of interviewees stated zero WTP, the average of the yearly household WTP was estimated as 5523 Korean won (KRW) (USD 4.92). This value ensures statistical significance. The population’s WTP for the reduction would be KRW 110.30 billion (USD 99.75 million) per year over the next five years. It was found that the reduction is socially beneficial since the value was greater than the costs involved in the reduction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Economic and Environmental Valuation · Environmental Sustainability in Business · Sustainable Supply Chain Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Ocean Science and Technology Policy Research Section, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, 385 Haeyang-Ro, Yeongdo-Gu, Busan 49111, Korea

Department of Energy Policy, Graduate School of Energy & Environment, Seoul National University of Science & Technology, 232 Gongreung-Ro, Nowon-Gu, Seoul 01811, Korea

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Estimating the damage cost of plastic waste in Galapagos Islands: A contingent valuation approach10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103933 ↗
2. Marine Debris & Plastics: Environmental Concerns, Sources, Impacts and Solutions10.1007/s10924-007-0074-3 ↗
3. Bergmann, M., Gutow, L., and Klages, M. (2015). Regulation and management of marine litter. A Marine Anthropogenic Litter, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3 ↗
4. United Nations Environment Programme (2016). Marine Plastic Debris and Microplastics Global Lessons and Research to Inspire Action and Guide Policy Change, United Nations Environment Programme. (In English).
5. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2020, June 04). The New Plastics Economy: Rethinking the Future of Plastics & Catalysing Action. Available online: http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications.
6. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2020, June 04). What is Marine Debris?, Available online: https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/marinedebris.html.
7. Olivelli, A., Hardesty, D., and Wilcox, C. (2020). Coastal margins and backshores represent a major sink for marine debris: Insights from a continental-scale analysis. Environ. Res. Lett., Available online: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab7836.10.1088/1748-9326/ab7836 ↗
8. The economic cost and control of marine debris damage in the Asia-Pacific Region10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.05.007 ↗
9. United Nations (2020, June 04). The Sustainable Development Goals Report. Available online: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2017/.
10. Human footprint in the abyss: 30 year records of deep-sea plastic debris10.1016/j.marpol.2018.03.022 ↗
11. Estimation of the annual flow and stock of marine debris in South Korea for management purposes10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.06.021 ↗
12. Challenges to marine debris management in Korea10.1080/08920750500217559 ↗
13. Impacts of marine debris on wild animals in the coastal area of Korea10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.10.022 ↗
14. The willingness to pay for removing the microplastics in the ocean—The case of Seoul metropolitan area, South Korea10.1016/j.marpol.2018.03.015 ↗
15. Contingent valuation analysis of willingness to pay for beach erosion control through the stabiplage technique: A study in Djerba (Tunisia)10.1016/j.marpol.2017.09.003 ↗
16. The economic benefits of achieving Good Environmental Status in the Finnish marine waters of the Baltic Sea10.1016/j.marpol.2018.10.014 ↗
17. Champ, P.A., Boyle, K.J., and Brown, T.C. (2017). Collecting nonmarket valuation data. A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, Springer. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-94-007-7104-8 ↗
18. Mitchell, R.C., and Carson, R.T. (1989). Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future.
19. Korea Development Institute (2012). Guidelines for Preliminary Feasibility Study Using Contingent Valuation Method, Korea Development Institute. (In Korean).
20. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation
21. One-and-one-half bound dichotomous choice contingent valuation10.1162/003465302760556549 ↗
22. Lim, S.Y., and Yoo, S.H. (2019). Will South Korean residential consumers accept the renewable heat incentive scheme? A stated preference approach. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12101910 ↗
23. Kim, J.H., Kim, H.J., and Yoo, S.H. (2018). Public value of enforcing the PM2.5 concentration reduction policy in South Korean urban areas. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10041144 ↗
24. Public willingness to pay for endocrine disrupting chemicals-free labelling policy in Korea10.1080/00036846.2018.1494803 ↗
25. Estimating the recreational value of Rudkhan Castel Forest Park: Application of One and One-half Bound (OOHD) dichotomous choice contingent valuation
26. South Koreans’ perspective on assisting the power supply to North Korea: Evidence from a contingent valuation10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111336 ↗
27. Champ, P.A., Boyle, K.J., and Brown, T.C. (2017). Valuing environmental goods and services: An economic perspective. A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, Springer. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-94-007-7104-8 ↗
28. Alberini, A., and Kahn, J.R. (2006). Fifty years of contingent valuation. Handbook on Contingent Valuation, Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781845427917 ↗
29. Carson, R.T. (2011). Contingent Valuation: A Comprehensive Bibliography and History, Edward Elgar.10.4337/9780857936288 ↗
30. Bennett, J. (2011). Estimating the robustness of contingent valuation estimates of WTP to survey mode and treatment of protest responses. The International Handbook on Non-Market Environmental Evaluation, Edward Elgar.
31. Freeman, A.M., Herriges, J.A., and Kling, C.L. (2014). The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods, RFF Press. [3rd ed.].10.4324/9781315780917 ↗
32. Champ, P.A., Boyle, K.J., and Brown, T.C. (2017). A Conceptual framework for nonmarket valuation. A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, Springer. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-94-007-7104-8 ↗
33. Bateman, I.J., Carson, R.T., Day, B., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., and Sugden, R. (2002). Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual, Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781781009727 ↗
34. Haab, T., Lewis, L., and Whitehead, J. (2020). State of the Art of Contingent Valuation, Oxford University Press. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science.10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.450 ↗
35. Champ, P.A., Boyle, K.J., and Brown, T.C. (2017). Contingent valuation in practice. A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, Springer. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-94-007-7104-8 ↗
36. Ahmed, S.U., and Gotoh, K. (2006). Cost-Benefit Analysis of Environmental Goods by Applying the Contingent Valuation Method: Some Japanese Case Studies, Springer.
37. Contingent valuation: Past, present and future10.18267/j.pep.380 ↗
38. Alberini, A., and Kahn, J.R. (2006). A practitioner’s primer on the contingent valuation method. Handbook on Contingent Valuation, Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781845427917 ↗
39. Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies
40. Spike models in contingent valuation10.2307/1244440 ↗
41. Habb, T.C., and McConnell, K.E. (2002). Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources, Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781843765431 ↗
42. Using a spike model to deal with zero response data from double bounded dichotomous contingent valuation survey10.1080/13504850210139378 ↗
43. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses10.2307/1240800 ↗
44. Contingent valuation10.1016/S1574-0099(05)02017-6 ↗
45. The existence value of a distinctive native American culture: Survival of the Hopi reservation10.1007/s10640-020-00412-5 ↗
46. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities10.2307/1924536 ↗
47. (2020, June 04). Statistics Korea. Available online: http://kosis.kr.
48. Korea Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (2019). The Third Marine Debris Management Master Plan. (2019–2023), Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries. (In Korean).