Reliability Analysis of Layered Soil Slopes Considering Different Spatial Autocorrelation Structures
Source abstract
Abstract
It is widely recognized that different geological formations often vary differently in space. Therefore, soil properties from different layers should be modeled by different autocorrelation functions (ACFs) to reflect such soil heterogeneity. However, the same ACFs are frequently used for different soil layers in slope reliability analysis for simplicity purpose in the literature. The present work is a study on the effects of ACFs on the reliability analysis of layered soil slopes, where the soil properties of different layers are considered by different ACFs. Five commonly used classical ACFs and the non-classical Whittle–Matérn model were investigated in this study. Cholesky decomposition and Monte Carlo simulation were used to simulate the spatial variability of the soil properties and estimate the probability of failure (Pf) of slopes, respectively. Illustrative examples with various parametric studies show that when the soil properties from different layers are characterized by the same ACFs, the Pf of the studied slopes is comparable with that estimated using different ACFs for different soil layers. This indicates that the type of ACF has only a small impact on the slope reliability assessment. However, the Pf may be underestimated by the single exponential ACF and overestimated by the cosine exponential ACF. The scale of fluctuation of the soil properties influences the slope reliability more than the ACFs. In addition, the smoothness parameter in the non-classical model has a significant influence on the reliability of the slope, where Pf increases with the increase of the smoothness parameter.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Soil and Unsaturated Flow · Dam Engineering and Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Nonferrous Metals and Geological Environment Monitoring, Ministry of Education, School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, 932 South Lushan Road, Changsha 410083, China
Hunan Key Laboratory of Nonferrous Resources and Geological Hazards Exploration, 932 South Lushan Road, Changsha 410083, China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of China
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Uzielli, M., Lacasse, S., Nadim, F., and Phoon, K.K. (2006). Soil variability analysis for geotechnical practice. Characterization & Engineering Properties of Natural Soils, CRC Press.
2. Influence of spatial variability on slope reliability using 2-D random fields10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000099 ↗
3. Probabilistic analysis of seepage that considers the spatial variability of permeability for an embankment on soil foundation10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.02.013 ↗
4. Wang, B., Liu, L., Li, Y., and Jiang, Q. (2020). Reliability analysis of slopes considering spatial variability of soil properties based on efficiently identified representative slip surfaces. Int. J. Rock Mech. Rock Eng.10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.12.003 ↗
5. Incorporating stratigraphic boundary uncertainty into reliability analysis of slopes in spatially variable soils using one-dimensional conditional Markov chain model10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103321 ↗
6. A sequential sparse polynomial chaos expansion using Bayesian regression for geotechnical reliability estimations10.1002/nag.3044 ↗
7. Effects of soil spatial variability on rainfall-induced landslides10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.02.016 ↗
8. A multiple response-surface method for slope reliability analysis considering spatial variability of soil properties10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.12.003 ↗
9. Effect of spatial variability of shear strength parameters on critical slip surfaces of slopes10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.007 ↗
10. Efficient slope reliability analysis at low-probability levels in spatially variable soils10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.01.016 ↗
11. Influence of length effect on embankment slope reliability in 3D10.1002/nag.2766 ↗
12. Identification of Statistically Homogeneous Soil Layers Using Modified Bartlett Statistics10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:7(649) ↗
13. Impact of Autocorrelation Function Model on the Probability of Failure10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001549 ↗
14. Probabilistic analysis of reinforced slopes using RFEM and considering spatial variability of frictional soil properties due to compaction10.1080/17499518.2017.1362443 ↗
15. Slope reliability analysis accounting for spatial variation10.1080/17499510701772089 ↗
16. Effects of spatial autocorrelation structure of permeability on seepage through an embankment on a soil foundation10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.02.007 ↗
17. Advanced reliability analysis of slopes in spatially variable soils using multivariate adaptive regression splines10.1016/j.gsf.2018.03.013 ↗
18. Spry, M.J., Kulhawy, F.H., and Grigoriu, M.D. (1988). Reliability-Based Foundation Design for Transmission Line Structures: Volume 1, Geotechnical Site Characterization Strategy: Final Report, Electric Power Research Institute.
19. Probabilistic design of slopes10.1139/t87-068 ↗
20. Probabilistic stability analysis of an embankment dam considering soil spatial variability10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103093 ↗
21. Deutsch, C. (2002). Geostatistical Reservoir Modeling, Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195138061.001.0001 ↗
22. Random field characterisation of stress-nomalised cone penetration testing parameters10.1680/geot.2005.55.1.3 ↗
23. Fenton, G.A., and Griffiths, D.V. (2008). Risk Assessment in Geotechnical Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9780470284704 ↗
24. Reliability Applied to Slope Stability Analysis10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:12(2180) ↗
25. Reliability analysis of embankment dam sliding stability using the sparse polynomial chaos expansion10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.053 ↗
26. A comparative study of different reliability methods for high dimensional stochastic problems related to earth dam stability analyses10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.056 ↗
27. Reliability analysis of tunnel lining considering soil spatial variability10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109332 ↗
28. Oliver, M.A., and Webster, R. (2015). Basic Steps in Geostatistics: The Variogram and Kriging, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-15865-5 ↗
29. Statistical inference of random field auto-correlation structure from multiple sets of incomplete and sparse measurements using Bayesian compressive sampling-based bootstrapping10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.01.049 ↗
30. Direct simulation of random field samples from sparsely measured geotechnical data with consideration of uncertainty in interpretation10.1139/cgj-2017-0254 ↗
31. Interpolation of spatially varying but sparsely measured geo-data: A comparative study10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.10.019 ↗
32. Vanmarcke, E.H. (1983). Random Fields Analysis and Synthesis, MIT Press.
33. Comparison between Karhunen-Loeve and wavelet expansions for simulation of Gaussian processes10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.03.008 ↗
34. Simulation of random fields via local average subdivision10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:8(1733) ↗
35. Quantitative risk assessment of slope failure in 2-D spatially variable soils by limit equilibrium method10.1016/j.apm.2017.03.048 ↗
36. Probabilistic Assessment of slope stability that considers the spatial variability of soil properties10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000309 ↗
37. Probabilistic slope stability analysis by finite elements10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:5(507) ↗
38. System reliability of slopes by RFEM10.3208/sandf.50.343 ↗
39. Probabilistic analysis of post-failure behavior of soil slopes using random smoothed particle hydrodynamics10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105266 ↗
40. GEO-SLOPE International Ltd. (2012). Stability Modeling With SLOPE/W: An Engineering Methodology [Computer Program], GEO-SLOPE International Ltd.
41. Shooman, M. (1968). Probabilistic Reliability—An Engineering Approach, McGraw-Hill.
42. Performance studies on six heuristic global optimization methods in the location of critical slip surface10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.01.004 ↗
43. Adaptive Monte Carlo simulation method for system reliability analysis of slope stability based on limit equilibrium methods10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105384 ↗
44. Identification of sample path smoothness in soil spatial variability10.1016/j.strusafe.2019.101870 ↗
45. The Matérn variogram model: Implications for uncertainty propagation and sampling in geostatistical surveys10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.04.016 ↗
46. Geostatistics with the Matern semivariogram model: A library of computer programs for inference, kriging and simulation10.1016/j.cageo.2007.09.020 ↗
47. Integrated framework for characterization of spatial variability of geological profiles10.1139/cgj-2016-0189 ↗