A Steady-State Model to Simulate Groundwater Flow in Unconfined Aquifer
Source abstract
Abstract
The hydraulic and hydrogeological features of the Caposele aquifer have been investigated by using a numerical groundwater flow model. In particular, groundwater flow simulations were performed for a multilayered, unconfined aquifer in steady-state conditions for different thicknesses of the aquifer’s saturated zone. The Caposele groundwater model was carried out starting from a generic model drained by a unique spring outlet in accordance with the geo-hydrological features of the study area. The conceptual model was built considering hydrogeological features of spring catchment, and was then implemented with the MODFLOW numerical code. A combined 2D-3D approach was adopted, and the model was calibrated on borehole data available for the time period 2012–2019. Different thicknesses of the aquifer were set, and a reliable relationship was found between the hydraulic head, saturated zone and hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer. Using the MODPATH package, the mean travel time (Darcian) of groundwater was computed for five different scenarios, corresponding to the model’s depths; the analysis that was performed shows that the travel time is higher for a greater and lower for a smaller thickness of the aquifer’s saturated zone, respectively. The Caposele aquifer model was zoned in different sectors, named flow pipe areas, that play different roles in groundwater recharge-discharge processes. A vector analysis was also carried out in order to highlight the ascendant flow near the spring zone.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Karst Systems and Hydrogeology · Groundwater flow and contamination studies · Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Science and Technology, University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy
Funding
Acquedotto Pugliese S.p.A.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Gallegos, J.J. (2011). Modeling Groundwater Flow in Karst Aquifers: An Evaluation of MODFLOW CFP at the Laboratory and Sub-Regional Scales. [Master’s Thesis, Florida State University].
2. White, W.B. (1988). Geomorphology and Hydrology of Karst Terrains, Oxford University Press.
3. Tóth, J. (1968). A Hydrogeological Study of the Three Hills Area, Alberta. Also: Alberta Geological Survey Bulletin Series, Research Council of Albert.
4. McDonald, M.G., and Harbaugh, A.W. (1988). A modular three-dimensional finite difference groundwater flow model. U.S.G.S Techniques of Water Resources Investigations, U.S.G.P.O. series number 06-A1.
5. Chiang, W.H., and Kinzelbach, W. (1998). Processing Modflow. A Simulation System for Modelling Groundwater Flow and Pollution, Springer.
6. Chiang, W.H. (2005). 3D-Groundwater Modeling with PMWIN: A Simulation System for Modeling Groundwater Flow and Transport Processes, Springer. [2nd ed.].
7. Hydrogeologic evaluation and numerical simulation of the Death Valley regional ground-water system, Nevada and California, using geoscientific information systems
8. The Practical Use of Simplicity in Developing Ground Water Models10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00227.x ↗
9. Death Valley regional ground-water flow model calibration using optimal parameter estimation methods and geoscientific information systems10.1016/S0309-1708(98)00053-0 ↗
10. Teutsch, G. (1990). An extended double-porosity concept as a practical modeling approach for a karstified terrain. Hydrogeological Processes in Karst Terranes. Antalya Symposium and Field Seminar, IAHS.
11. Can we simulate regional groundwater flow in a karst system using equivalent porous media models? Case study, Barton Springs Edwards aquifer, USA10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00064-7 ↗
12. El-Kadi, A.I. (1995). Is it appropriate to apply porous media groundwater circulation models to karstic aquifers. Groundwater Models for Resources Analysis and Management, Lewis Publishers.
13. Modeling of storm responses in conduit flow aquifers with reservoirs J10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00149-8 ↗
14. Application of MODFLOW for simulating groundwater flow in the Trifilia karst aquifer, Greece10.1007/s12665-012-1630-2 ↗
15. A theoretical analysis of groundwater flow in small drainage basins10.1029/JZ068i016p04795 ↗
16. Shoemaker, W.B., Kuniansky, E.L., Birk, S., Bauer, S., and Swain, E.D. (2008). Documentation of a Conduit Flow Process (CFP) for MODFLOW-2005, U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods. Chapter A24.10.3133/tm6A24 ↗
17. Karst spring hydrographs as indicators of karst aquifers10.1080/02626669309492639 ↗
18. Spring hydrographs as indicators of droughts in a karst environment10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.034 ↗
19. Darcy, H. (1856). Les Fontaines Publiques de la Ville de Dijon, Exposition et Application des Principes a suivre et des formules a employer dans les questions de distribution d’eau, Victor Dalmont Editeur.
20. Flow in Porous Media I: A Theoretical Derivation of Darcy’s Law10.1007/BF01036523 ↗
21. Nield, D.A., and Bejan, A. (2013). Mechanics of Fluid Flow through a Porous Medium. Convection in Porous Media, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-5541-7 ↗
22. Anderson, M.P., and Woessner, W.W. (1992). Applied Groundwater Modeling, Academic Press.
23. Pollock, D.W. (2016). User Guide for MODPATH Version 7. A Particle-Tracking Model for MODFLOW, U.S. Geological Survey. Open File Report 1086.10.3133/ofr20161086 ↗
24. Bear, J. (1979). Hydraulics of Groundwater, McGraw-Hill Series in Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, McGraw-Hill.
25. Dupuit, J. (1863). Etudes Thèoriques et Pratiques sur le Mouvement des Eaux dans les Canaux Dècouverts et à Travers les Terrains Permèables, Dunod Éditeur. [2nd ed.].
26. Forchheimer, P. (1886). Uber die Ergiebigkeit von Brunnen-Anlagen und Sickerschiltzen, Ing.-Ver.
27. Vertically Integrated Flows, Discharge Potential and Dupuit-Forchheimer Approximation10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.00173.x ↗
28. Residence Time Distributions in non-uniform aquifer recharge and thickness conditions.An analytical approach based on the assumption of Dupuit-Forchheimer10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.032 ↗
29. Zerihun, Y.T. (2018). Extension of the Dupuit-Forchheimer model for non-hydrostatic flows in unconfined aquifers. Fluids, 3.10.3390/fluids3020042 ↗
30. Celico, P. (1988). Prospezioni Idrogeologiche, Liguori Editore.
31. Towards operational methods for the assessment of intrinsic groundwater vulnerability: A review10.1080/10643389.2016.1160816 ↗
32. Transit times: The link between hydrology and water quality at the catchment scale10.1002/wat2.1155 ↗
33. Global aquifers dominated by fossil groundwaters but wells vulnerable to modern contamination10.1038/ngeo2943 ↗
34. Tectono-stratigraphic setting of the Campania region (southern Italy)10.1080/17445647.2018.1424655 ↗
35. ISPRA (2020, April 14). Geological Map of Italy, 1:50.000 Scale, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale, Available online: http://www.isprambiente.gov.it/Media/carg/450_SANTANGELOLOMBARDI/Foglio.html, http://www.isprambiente.gov.it/Media/carg/468_Eboli/Foglio.html.
36. A model to simulate re charge processes of karst massifs10.1002/hyp.10353 ↗
37. Recharge process of Matese karst massif (southern Italy)10.1007/s12665-015-4678-y ↗
38. Hydrogeological features of endorheic areas in southern Italy
39. Comparative analysis of different boundary conditions and their influence on numerical hydrogeological modeling of Palmital watershed, southeast Brazil10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.05.006 ↗
40. The relation between karst spring discharge and rainfall by the cross-correlation analysis10.1007/s10040-010-0666-1 ↗
41. Fiorillo, F., Leone, G., Pagnozzi, M., Catani, V., Testa, G., and Esposito, L. (2019). The Upwelling Groundwater Flow in Karst area of Grassano-Telese Springs (Southern Italy). Water, 11.10.3390/w11050872 ↗
42. Lancia, M., Saroli, M., and Petitta, M. (2018). A double scale methodology to investigate flow in karst fractured media via numerical analysis: The Cassino plain case study (Central Apennine, Italy). Hindawi Geofluids, 12. Article ID 2937105.10.1155/2018/2937105 ↗
43. Long-term trend and fluctuations of karst spring discharge in a Mediterranean area (central-southern Italy)10.1007/s12665-014-3946-6 ↗
44. Crustal deformation and seismicity modulated by groundwater recharge of karst aquifers
45. Laplace, P.S. (1787). Mémoire sur la Théorie de L’anneau de Saturrne. Mémoires de Academie Royale des Sciences de Paris, France.
46. Laplace equation and Faraday’s lines of force10.1029/2007WR006221 ↗
47. Fiorillo, F., Esposito, L., Testa, G., Ciarcia, S., and Pagnozzi, M. (2018). The Upwelling Water Flux Feeding Springs: Hydrogeological and Hydraulic Features. Water, 10.10.3390/w10040501 ↗
48. The problem of modelling limestone springs: The case of Bagnara (North Apennines, Italy)10.1111/j.1745-6584.1997.tb00126.x ↗
49. Modeling of groundwater flow in a fractured-karst aquifer in the Big Springs Basin, Iowa
50. Modeling complex flow in a karst aquifer10.1016/j.sedgeo.2005.11.009 ↗
51. Transfer function-noise modelling of an aquifer system in NE Italy10.1002/hyp.7832 ↗
52. Carbon 13 of TDCI to quantify the role of the unsaturated zone: The example of the Vaucluse karst systems (Southeastern France)10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00180-X ↗
53. Effective conductivity of isotropic highly heterogeneous formations: Numerical and theoretical issues10.1029/2012WR012441 ↗
54. Analysis of flow through heterogeneous random aquifers by the method of embedding matrix: 1. Steady flow10.1029/WR017i001p00107 ↗
55. Ababou, R., McLaughlin, D.B., and Gelhar, L.W. (1988). Three-Dimensional Flow in Random Porous Media. [Ph.D. Thesis, Parsons Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
56. Dagan, G. (1989). Flow and Transport in Porous Formations, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-75015-1 ↗
57. Influence of input and parameter uncertainty on the prediction of catchment-scale groundwater travel time distributions10.5194/hess-23-171-2019 ↗
58. Gabrovšek, F. (2002). Karstification and groundwater flow. Evolution of Karst: From Prekarst to Cessation, ZRC Publishing.10.3986/9616358634 ↗