journal article·1988-09

A direct boundary element method for plane strain poroelasticity

Alexander H.‐D. Cheng, Emmanuel Detournay

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a direct boundary element method (BEM), formulated in the Laplace transform space, for plane strain poroelasticity. The paper expands on work by Cheng and Liggett by recasting the theoretical foundation of BEM within the framework of Rice and Cleary's formulation of the Biot theory of poroelasticity. Furthermore, the numerical algorithm is generalized to deal with both interior and exterior domain problems, and a method for indirectly calculating the Cauchy principal value of the singular integrals is presented. Formulae for the stress and flux inside the domain are also derived. Finally, the algorithm is validated by comparing the numerical results with the analytical solution of a borehole subject to a far‐field deviatoric stress (exterior domain) and with the solution of Mandel's problem (interior domain). These two examples provide a critical test of the algorithm.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Rock Mechanics and Modeling

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.171288610.1063/1.1712886 ↗
2. 10.1680/geot.1953.3.7.28710.1680/geot.1953.3.7.287 ↗
3. Verruijt A. · 1969 · 331
4. 10.1029/JB081i029p0532210.1029/JB081i029p05322 ↗
5. 10.1016/0020-7683(82)90093-210.1016/0020-7683(82)90093-2 ↗
6. Rudnicki J. · 1985 · 315
7. 10.1061/JMCEA3.000112410.1061/JMCEA3.0001124 ↗
8. Zienkiewicz O. · 1976
9. 10.1002/nag.161008010610.1002/nag.1610080106 ↗
10. 10.1016/0020-7683(78)90045-810.1016/0020-7683(78)90045-8 ↗
11. 10.1002/nme.162020020610.1002/nme.1620200206 ↗
12. 10.1016/0307-904X(87)90144-210.1016/0307-904X(87)90144-2 ↗
13. Aramaki G. · 1982 · 36310.1007/978-3-662-11273-1_25 ↗
14. Banerjee P. K. · 1982 · 19
15. 10.1115/1.317311710.1115/1.3173117 ↗
16. L.Vandamme E.DetournayandA. H.‐D.Cheng “A 2‐D poroelastic displacement discontinuity method for hydraulic fracture simulation” Int. j. numer. anal. methods geomech.submitted (1988).10.1002/nag.1610130209 ↗
17. A. H.‐D.Cheng ‘Boundary integral equation formulation for porous‐elasticity with applications in soil mechanics and geophysics’ Ph. D. thesis Cornell University 1981.
18. 10.1029/RG014i002p0022710.1029/RG014i002p00227 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.172195610.1063/1.1721956 ↗
20. 10.1002/nme.162002020610.1002/nme.1620020206 ↗
21. 10.1680/geot.1954.4.4.14310.1680/geot.1954.4.4.143 ↗
22. Poroelastic response of a borehole in a non‐hydrostatic stress field10.1016/0148-9062(88)92299-1 ↗
23. Nowacki W. · 1986
24. Banerjee P. K. · 1981
25. Jaswon M. A. · 1977
26. 10.1002/nme.162018120710.1002/nme.1620181207 ↗
27. R. A.Schapery ‘Approximate methods of transform inversion for viscoelastic stress analysis’ in Proc. 4th U. S. National Congress on Applied Mechanics Vol. 2 1962 pp.1075–1085.
28. 10.1112/jlms/s1-18.2.7210.1112/jlms/s1-18.2.72 ↗
29. An easy approximate method of determining the relaxation spectrum of a viscoelastic material10.1002/pol.1951.120060211 ↗
30. 10.1093/qjmam/16.4.40110.1093/qjmam/16.4.401 ↗
31. A.Verruijt ‘Discussion’ Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Vol. 3 Montreal 1965 pp.401–402.