Which Influencing Factors Could Reduce Ecological Consumption? Evidence from 90 Countries for the Time Period 1996–2015
Source abstract
Abstract
In the “full world” and Anthropocene, global ecological consumption is beyond natural capital’s regenerative and absorptive abilities, and ecological consumption of humanity has to be reduced to have an ecologically sustainable future. To achieve the goal of ecological sustainability, influencing factors that could reduce ecological consumption need to be explored. Based on three panel datasets for the time period 1996–2015, this paper estimates the impacts of urbanization, renewable energy consumption, service industries, and internet usage on ecological consumption for all 90 sample countries, the 42 developed countries, and the 48 developing countries. Education and income are taken as control variables in the panel regressions. As a consumption-side indicator, the ecological footprint is selected to measure ecological consumption. The estimations find that (1) urbanization has negative impacts for all sample countries and the developed countries, and it is insignificant for the developing countries, (2) renewable energy consumption and service industries have negative impacts for all of the three samples, and (3) internet usage has lagged negative impacts for all sample countries, and it is an independent and significant force of reducing ecological consumption in the developing countries rather than the developed countries. It is found that there is a positive linear relationship, an inversed U-shaped relationship, and a U-shaped relationship between ecological consumption and income in all sample countries, the developed countries, and the developing countries, respectively. The estimated results provide guidance for evidence-based policymaking on reducing ecological consumption.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Energy and Environment Impacts
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Design and Innovation, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Funding
Shanghai “Chen-Guang Project” · Shanghai Summit Discipline in Design
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Some overlaps between the first and second thirty years of ecological economics10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106372 ↗
2. Role of economics in analyzing the environment and sustainable development10.1073/pnas.1901616116 ↗
3. Economics in the anthropocene: Species extinction or steady state economics10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106392 ↗
4. A safe operating space for humanity10.1038/461472a ↗
5. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet10.1126/science.1259855 ↗
6. A theory on the future of the rebound effect in a resource-constrained world10.3389/fenrg.2018.00081 ↗
7. Mediterranean countries’ food consumption and sourcing patterns: An Ecological Footprint viewpoint10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.191 ↗
8. Making the Sustainable Development Goals consistent with sustainability10.3389/fenrg.2017.00018 ↗
9. Demand side management opportunities, framework, and implications for sustainable development in resource-rich countries: Case study Qatar10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118332 ↗
10. Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in seven regions: The role of renewable energy10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.059 ↗
11. The HDI 2010: New controversies, old critiques10.1007/s10888-011-9178-z ↗
12. Learning and teaching sustainability: The contribution of Ecological Footprint calculators10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.024 ↗
13. Exploring ecosystem services assessment through Ecological Footprint accounting10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.010 ↗
14. Standard Ecological Footprint method for small, highly specialized economies10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.034 ↗
15. Does income growth relocate ecological footprint?10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.022 ↗
16. Can we consume less and gain more? Environmental efficiency of well-being at the individual level10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.09.016 ↗
17. Is the ecological footprint related to the Kuznets curve a real process or rationalizing the ecological consequences of the affluence? Evidence from PSTR approach10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.034 ↗
18. A good life for all within planetary boundaries10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4 ↗
19. Investigation of the ecological footprint’s driving factors: What we learn from the experience of emerging economies10.1016/j.scs.2019.101626 ↗
20. The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: Evidence from panel data estimation10.1007/s11356-018-3992-9 ↗
21. What drives environmental degradation? Evidence from 14 Sub-Saharan African countries10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.354 ↗
22. Ecological footprint, urbanization, and energy consumption in South Africa: Including the excluded10.1007/s11356-019-05924-2 ↗
23. Investigating the impact of human capital on the ecological footprint in India: An empirical analysis10.1007/s11356-019-05911-7 ↗
24. Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries10.1177/0958305X19834279 ↗
25. An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries10.1007/s11356-019-05446-x ↗
26. The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: A panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.031 ↗
27. Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.139 ↗
28. Shujah-ur-Rahman Chen, S., Saud, S., Saleem, N., and Bari, M.W. (2019). Nexus between financial development, energy consumption, income level, and ecological footprint in CEE countries: Do human capital and biocapacity matter?. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.10.1007/s11356-019-06343-z ↗
29. Agriculture and environmental degradation in Africa: The role of income10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.129 ↗
30. Reducing carbon emissions: The role of renewable energy and democracy10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118245 ↗
31. Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.104 ↗
32. Dynamics of renewable energy consumption and economic activities across the agriculture, industry, and service sectors: Evidence in the perspective of sustainable development10.1007/s11356-017-0552-7 ↗
33. Assessing the sustainability of renewable energy: An empirical analysis of selected 18 European countries10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.170 ↗
34. Energy consumption in service industries: Challenging the myth of non-materiality10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.003 ↗
35. Analysis of energy use and CO2 emission in service industries: Evidence from Sweden10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.051 ↗
36. Renewable energy, nuclear energy, and environmental pollution: Accounting for political institutional quality in South Africa10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.320 ↗
37. The internet and the new energy economy10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00084-8 ↗
38. Collaborative collection effort strategies based on the Internet + recycling business model10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118120 ↗
39. The environmental impact of green consumption and sufficiency lifestyles scenarios in Europe: Connecting local sustainability visions to global consequences10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.002 ↗
40. Experimental evidence of an environmental attitude-behavior gap in high-cost situations10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106434 ↗
41. Spatiotemporal characteristics and driving forces of urban sprawl in China during 2003–201710.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118061 ↗
42. The effects of Internet usage and economic growth on CO2 emissions in OECD countries: A panel investigation10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.018 ↗