A Simple Approach for Circular Tunnels Excavated in Strain‐Softening and Dilatancy Rock Masses
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study proposes a simple numerical approach that incorporates rock strain‐softening (SS) and dilatancy into the triple‐shear‐element unified strength criterion (TS‐USC). A parametric analysis is conducted to elucidate rock mass responses. The results demonstrate that the intermediate principal stress (IPS) enhances rock mass stability and limits plastic zone growth. The TS‐USC should be used with caution for tunnel stability evaluation because it may underestimate rock displacements. Dilatancy behaviors notably affect rock displacements but have minimal influence on plastic zone radius, radial stresses, and tangential stresses. Therefore, the dilatancy model needs to be chosen reasonably to achieve an acceptable accuracy level. Rock displacements at the excavation profile and the plastic zone radius increase approximately linearly under different SS behaviors. SS behaviors mainly affect tangential stresses; however, for a fixed SS behavior (i.e., for a given δ ), radial stresses at softening‐residual interface are minimally affected by supporting force. These factors deserve attentions during stability analysis and support system design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering Xijing University Xi'an China
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Safety and Durability of Concrete Structures Xijing University Xi'an China
School of Highway Chang'an University Xi'an China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.08.00410.1016/j.jrmge.2024.08.004 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.tust.2025.10707710.1016/j.tust.2025.107077 ↗
3. Analysis of Macro‐Micro Mechanisms and Influencing Factors of Composite Rock Failure Under Excavation Disturbance
4. 10.1016/j.asej.2026.10407610.1016/j.asej.2026.104076 ↗
5. Yan Y. F. · Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology · 2026
6. Study on the Mechanical Properties of tbm Crossing Composite Strata With Large Longitudinal Slopes
7. 10.1016/j.istruc.2025.10919310.1016/j.istruc.2025.109193 ↗
8. 10.1007/s40098‐020‐00411‐910.1007/s40098‐020‐00411‐9 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.10631910.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106319 ↗
10. 10.1080/17486025.2023.222610710.1080/17486025.2023.2226107 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.probengmech.2024.10369210.1016/j.probengmech.2024.103692 ↗
12. 10.1007/s00603-026-05415-010.1007/s00603-026-05415-0 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.tust.2018.11.04510.1016/j.tust.2018.11.045 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apm.2020.11.04210.1016/j.apm.2020.11.042 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.03110.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.031 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0886‐7798(98)00023‐610.1016/S0886‐7798(98)00023‐6 ↗
17. Mechanic Performance of Novel Prefabricated Inverted Arch in NATM Tunnels: Insights From Numerical Experiment and In‐Situ Tests
18. 10.1016/j.tust.2019.10325410.1016/j.tust.2019.103254 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.10.00510.1016/j.jrmge.2022.10.005 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.10335410.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103354 ↗
21. 10.1155/2021/553796310.1155/2021/5537963 ↗
22. 10.1680/geng.13.0014410.1680/geng.13.00144 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.tust.2016.05.00710.1016/j.tust.2016.05.007 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.000182210.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.0001822 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.10314210.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103142 ↗
26. 10.1029/JZ072i020p0511710.1029/JZ072i020p05117 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.tust.2018.11.01510.1016/j.tust.2018.11.015 ↗
28. 10.1007/978-3-642-18943-210.1007/978-3-642-18943-2 ↗
29. 10.1115/1.147245510.1115/1.1472455 ↗
30. 10.3321/j.issn:1000‐6915.2004.18.00110.3321/j.issn:1000‐6915.2004.18.001 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.01.00510.1016/j.compgeo.2012.01.005 ↗
32. 10.1007/s11771‐017‐3552‐310.1007/s11771‐017‐3552‐3 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.apm.2022.06.0010.1016/j.apm.2022.06.00 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.05.00510.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.05.005 ↗
35. 10.1590/1679‐7825632810.1590/1679‐78256328 ↗
36. 10.1007/s40515‐020‐00133‐810.1007/s40515‐020‐00133‐8 ↗
37. 10.1007/s40515‐020‐00137‐410.1007/s40515‐020‐00137‐4 ↗
38. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090‐0241(2007)133:9(1128)10.1061/(ASCE)1090‐0241(2007)133:9(1128) ↗
39. 10.1007/s00603‐021‐02505‐z10.1007/s00603‐021‐02505‐z ↗
40. 10.1007/s00603‐020‐02293‐y10.1007/s00603‐020‐02293‐y ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.09.04310.1016/j.jrmge.2024.09.043 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.tust.2024.10560110.1016/j.tust.2024.105601 ↗
43. 10.1155/2023/328022310.1155/2023/3280223 ↗
44. 10.1007/s00603‐005‐0064‐510.1007/s00603‐005‐0064‐5 ↗
45. Non‐Associated Plasticity for Soils, Concrete and Rock
46. 10.1002/nag.31510.1002/nag.315 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.01.00310.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.01.003 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.10347610.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103476 ↗
49. 10.1016/S1365‐1609(00)00057‐510.1016/S1365‐1609(00)00057‐5 ↗
50. 10.1016/0148‐9062(86)92491‐510.1016/0148‐9062(86)92491‐5 ↗
51. Kaliszky S. · 1989
52. 10.1016/S1365‐1609(03)00040‐610.1016/S1365‐1609(03)00040‐6 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.03.00210.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.03.002 ↗
54. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9410(1983)109:1(15)10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9410(1983)109:1(15) ↗
55. 10.1002/nag.161002040610.1002/nag.1610020406 ↗
56. 10.1007/s11431‐022‐2158‐910.1007/s11431‐022‐2158‐9 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.tust.2007.11.00210.1016/j.tust.2007.11.002 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.tust.2009.07.00410.1016/j.tust.2009.07.004 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.07.00810.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.07.008 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2013.08.00110.1016/j.jrmge.2013.08.001 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.sandf.2013.06.00310.1016/j.sandf.2013.06.003 ↗
62. 10.12989/gae.2013.5.2.09910.12989/gae.2013.5.2.099 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.sandf.2021.09.00710.1016/j.sandf.2021.09.007 ↗
64. 10.1016/S1365‐1609(97)80069‐X10.1016/S1365‐1609(97)80069‐X ↗