Spatial Interpolation of GNSS Troposphere Wet Delay by a Newly Designed Artificial Neural Network Model
Source abstract
Abstract
Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals arrive at the Earth in a nonlinear and slightly curved way due to the refraction effect caused by the troposphere. The troposphere delay of the GNSS signal consists of hydrostatic and wet parts. In particular, tropospheric wet delay prediction and interpolation are more difficult than those of the dry component due to the rapid temporal and spatial variation of the water vapor content. Wet delay estimation and interpolation with a sufficient accuracy is an important issue for all parameters obtained by GNSS positioning techniques. In particular, in real-time positioning applications, errors caused by interpolation of the wet troposphere delay are reflected in the height component of about 1 to 2 cm. Furthermore, the amount of water vapor in the troposphere is very important information in weather forecast applications obtained as a function of wet delay. Therefore, real-time monitoring of the troposphere can be achieved with a higher resolution and accuracy by utilizing neural network models for interpolation of the wet tropospheric delay. In addition, in the absence of the GNSS station, wet delays can be interpolated by means of the surrounding stations to the desired location. In this study, a back propagation artificial neural network (BPNN) model based on meteorological parameters obtained from The New Austrian Meteorological Measuring Network (TAWES) was used to interpolate wet troposphere delay. Analysis was carried out at 40 reference stations of the Echtzeit Positionierung Austria (EPOSA) GNSS Network covering the whole of Austria. The interpolation of zenith wet delays based on the artificial neural network was performed by using latitude, longitude, altitude and meteorological parameters (temperature, pressure, weighted mean temperature, and water vapor pressure). These parameters were then subtracted from the artificial neural network model one by one and six different artificial neural networks were designed. In addition, the linear interpolation method (LIN) and inverse distance weighted interpolation method (IDW) were used as conventional interpolation methods. In order to investigate the effect of the network density on interpolation methods, three networks, including 40, 30, and 20 reference stations, were formed and the increased distance effect on interpolation methods was evaluated. In addition, analyses were conducted in winter, spring, and summer to evaluate the seasonal effects on interpolation methods. According to the statistical analysis, the root mean square error (RMSE) values of the IDW, LIN, and BPNN methods were found to be 12.6, 13.4, and 5.9 mm, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GNSS positioning and interference · Geophysics and Gravity Measurements · Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Geomatic Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Esenler, Istanbul 34220, Turkey
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Global mapping functions for the atmosphere delay at radio wavelengths10.1029/95JB03048 ↗
2. Böhm, J., Niell, A., Tregoning, P., and Schuh, H. (2006). Global Mapping Function (GMF): A new empirical mapping function based on numerical weather model data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33.10.1029/2005GL025546 ↗
3. Two-quartic tropospheric refractivity profile for correcting satellite data10.1029/JC074i018p04487 ↗
4. Contributions to the theory of atmospheric refraction10.1007/BF02521844 ↗
5. Goad, C., and Goodman, L. (1974, January 12–17). Modified Hopfield tropospheric refraction correction model. Proceedings of the Fall Annual Meeting American Geophysical Union, San Francisco, CA, USA.
6. An easily implemented algorithm for the tropospheric range correction10.1029/JB083iB04p01825 ↗
7. Geodesy by radio interferometry: Effects of atmospheric modeling errors on estimates of baseline length10.1029/RS020i006p01593 ↗
8. Estimation of tropospheric delay for microwaves from surface weather data10.1029/RS022i003p00379 ↗
9. Mendes, V. (1999). Modeling the Neutral-Atmospheric Propagation Delay in Radiometric Space Techniques, UNB Brunswick.
10. Evaluation of Precipitable Water Vapor Derived From Global Navigation Satellite System Observations based on Troposphere Model
11. Investigation of different interpolation models used in Network-RTK for the virtual reference station technique10.5081/jgps.10.2.136 ↗
12. Accuracy investigation of height obtained from Classical and Network RTK with ANOVA test10.1016/j.measurement.2016.04.045 ↗
13. Research on regional zenith tropospheric delay based on neural network technology10.1179/1752270614Y.0000000130 ↗
14. A neural network model for predicting weighted mean temperature10.1007/s00190-018-1114-6 ↗
15. Rodrigues, E.R., Oliveira, I., Cunha, R., and Netto, M. (November, January 29). DeepDownscale: A deep learning strategy for high-resolution weather forecast. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
16. Benevides, P., Catalao, J., and Nico, G. (2019). Neural Network Approach to Forecast Hourly Intense Rainfall Using GNSS Precipitable Water Vapor and Meteorological Sensors. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11080966 ↗
17. Improving ECMWF-based 6-h maximum rain using instability indices and neural networks10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.10.020 ↗
18. Development of an ANN based corrective algorithm of the operational ECMWF global horizontal irradiation forecasts10.1016/j.solener.2019.04.070 ↗
19. A feature based neural network model for weather forecasting
20. Application of artificial neural networks for temperature forecasting
21. An artificial neural network model for rainfall forecasting in Bangkok, Thailand10.5194/hess-13-1413-2009 ↗
22. Weather forecasting model using artificial neural network10.1016/j.protcy.2012.05.047 ↗
23. Evaluation of several soft computing methods in monthly evapotranspiration modelling10.1002/met.1676 ↗
24. Naganna, S.R., Deka, P.C., Ghorbani, M.A., Biazar, S.M., Al-Ansari, N., and Yaseen, Z.M. (2019). Dew point temperature estimation: Application of artificial intelligence model integrated with nature-inspired optimization algorithms. Water, 11.10.3390/w11040742 ↗
25. Zheng, Y., Feng, Y., and Bai, Z. (2005). Grid residual tropospheric corrections for improved differential GPS positioning over the Victoria GPS Network (GPSnet). Positioning, 1.10.5081/jgps.4.1.284 ↗
26. Pace, B., Pacione, R., Sciarretta, C., and Vespe, F. (2010, January 2–5). Estimating Zenith Total Delay Residual Fields by using Ground-Based GPS network. Proceedings of the XX EUREF Symposium, Gävle, Sweden.
27. Atmospheric water vapour correction to InSAR surface motion measurements on mountains: Results from a dense GPS network on Mount Etna10.1016/S1474-7065(02)00013-X ↗
28. Emardson, T., Simons, M., and Webb, F. (2003). Neutral atmospheric delay in interferometric synthetic aperture radar applications: Statistical description and mitigation. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 108.10.1029/2002JB001781 ↗
29. Tropospheric corrections to SAR interferometry from GPS observations10.1007/s10291-004-0099-1 ↗
30. Zhang, J. (1999, January 14–17). Precise estimation of residual tropospheric delays in a spatial GPS network. Proceedings of the National Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, ION GPS/1999, Nashville, TN, USA.
31. The TropGrid2 standard tropospheric correction model10.1007/s10291-013-0316-x ↗
32. Bernese GPS software version 5.0
33. Shepard, D. (1968, January 27–29). A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM national conference, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/800186.810616 ↗
34. De Haan, S. (2006). National/Regional Operational Procedures of GPS Water Vapour Networks and Agreed International Procedures, WMO.