journal article·2018-03

Analytical approach for time‐dependent groundwater inflow into shield tunnel face in confined aquifer

Xiao‐Xue Liu, Shui‐Long Shen, Ye‐Shuang Xu, Zhen‐Yu Yin

Publisher page

Abstract

Summary Prediction of time‐dependent groundwater inflow into a shield tunnel is a significant task facing engineers. Published literature shows that there is no available method with which to predict time‐dependent groundwater inflow into a tunnel. This paper presents a prediction approach for time‐dependent groundwater inflow into a tunnel in both anisotropic and isotropic confined aquifers. The proposed solution can predict groundwater inrush from the tunnel cutting face. To obtain the time‐dependent groundwater flow quantity, the concept of a horizontal‐well pumping test based on the theory of a point source is adopted. Multiple factors, eg, drawdown, thickness of aquifer, conductivities, and specific storage, are taken into account. Both groundwater inflow to the cross section of a tunnel face in the y‐z plane and total tunnel inflow are obtained. Based on the proposed approach, the time‐dependent groundwater inflow to a tunnel can be classified as either a uniform or non‐uniform flow. The proposed approach is applied to analyse groundwater inflow of 2 field cases: (1) Metro line No. 7, Guangzhou City and (2) an underground tunnel in Huizhou, Guangdong Province. Results show that the proposed method can predict the measured values, and drawdown‐related curves are also derived. In addition, the calculated results also reveal that the effect of hydraulic conductivity kz on the total groundwater inflow differs from that of hydraulic conductivities kx and ky and the thickness of the aquifer.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai 200240 China

Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Ship and Deep‐Sea Exploration (CISSE) Shanghai 200240 China

Department of Civil Engineering, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean, and Civil Engineering Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai 200240 China

Research Institute of Civil Engineering and Mechanics (GeM), UMR CNRS 6183, Ecole Centrale de Nantes Nantes 44321 France

Funding

National Basic Research Programme of China · National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC)

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.tust.2006.03.00310.1016/j.tust.2006.03.003 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.tust.2015.08.00110.1016/j.tust.2015.08.001 ↗
3. 10.1139/cgj-2014-028510.1139/cgj-2014-0285 ↗
4. Characteristics of dewatering induced drawdown curve under barrier effect of retaining wall in aquifer
5. 10.1139/t11-04910.1139/t11-049 ↗
6. 10.1139/cgj-2013-004210.1139/cgj-2013-0042 ↗
7. Estimation of lateral displacement induced by jet grouting in clayey soils10.1680/jgeot.16.P.159 ↗
8. Investigation of a large ground collapse and countermeasures during mountain tunneling in Hangzhou: A case study
9. Structural behaviors of large underground earth‐retaining systems in Shanghai. I: Unpropped circular diaphragm wall
10. 10.1139/cgj-2014-028910.1139/cgj-2014-0289 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11069-012-0512-y10.1007/s11069-012-0512-y ↗
12. Factor analysis of land subsidence in Shanghai: A view based on strategic environmental assessment
13. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.03.05110.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.03.051 ↗
14. Effect of excavation‐induced groundwater level drawdown on tunnel inflow in a jointed rock mass10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.09.002 ↗
15. Investigation of hydraulic parameters of a weathered mylonite fault from field pumping tests: A case study
16. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.10.00110.1016/j.enggeo.2010.10.001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.sandf.2013.10.00810.1016/j.sandf.2013.10.008 ↗
18. Barrier effect of underground structures on aquifers10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.07.004 ↗
19. Hydrogeological assessment of non‐linear underground enclosures
20. 10.1002/nag.112510.1002/nag.1125 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.11.00410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.11.004 ↗
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000105910.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001059 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000052710.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000527 ↗
24. Fractal prediction of grouting volume for treating karst caverns along a shield tunnel alignment10.3390/app7070652 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000093210.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000932 ↗
26. Prediction of ground water level in arid environment using a non‐deterministic model10.4236/jwarp.2014.67064 ↗
27. 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.00084.x10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.00084.x ↗
28. 10.1016/S0304-3800(97)00197-X10.1016/S0304-3800(97)00197-X ↗
29. Prediction of water inflow in tunnel based on stochastic finite element of unsteady seepage
30. Ground response to multiple parallel microtunneling operations in cemented silty clay and sand
31. Numerical analysis of steady‐state groundwater inflow into Tabriz line 2 metro tunnel, northwestern Iran, with special consideration of model dimensions
32. Evaluating the impacts of grid cell properties in spatial discretization of groundwater model for a tropical karst catchment in Rote Island, Indonesia
33. Impact of some factors on the maximum module of water runoff in mountain rivers of the Caucasus10.1134/S0097807812020066 ↗
34. A stochastic‐conceptual reservoir inflow forecasting model. Waterpower. 85
35. Water inflow assessment to Karaj water conveyance tunnel, northern Iran
36. Identification of tunnel settlement caused by land subsidence in soft deposit of Shanghai
37. The effect of grouting reinforcement on groundwater seepage in deep tunnels
38. 10.1139/cgj-2015-057410.1139/cgj-2015-0574 ↗
39. Groundwater inflow during tunnel driving
40. 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb00953.x10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb00953.x ↗
41. Circular tunnel in a semi‐infinite aquifer
42. Circular tunnel in a semi‐infinite aquifer10.1016/S0886-7798(02)00102-5 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.tust.2006.02.00110.1016/j.tust.2006.02.001 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.tust.2007.02.00410.1016/j.tust.2007.02.004 ↗
45. Prediction analysis of fissure water in metro tunnels based on groundwater dynamics
46. 10.1007/s12594-012-0122-z10.1007/s12594-012-0122-z ↗
47. 10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00013-X10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00013-X ↗
48. On the horizontal‐well pumping tests in anisotropic confined aquifers10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00453-X ↗
49. 10.1016/S0309-1708(00)00014-210.1016/S0309-1708(00)00014-2 ↗
50. Bear J · 1979
51. 10.1016/j.watres.2006.12.02510.1016/j.watres.2006.12.025 ↗
52. Geological formation and geo‐hazards during subway construction in Guangzhou10.1007/s12665-016-5710-6 ↗
53. Simulating water inflow in the underground tunnel with a coupled fracture‐matrix model10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000455 ↗
54. 10.1080/17415977.2016.125931510.1080/17415977.2016.1259315 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.tust.2013.10.01310.1016/j.tust.2013.10.013 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.03.01110.1016/j.compgeo.2015.03.011 ↗