A hydrodynamic model for analyzing the closure stresses in the wellbore strengthening problem
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The problem of creating unwanted fractures while drilling ultradeep wells is mitigated with the application of wellbore strengthening techniques. Despite the numerous applications, an open question remains about the efficiency of the loss of circulation materials (LCM) and its implications on the closure stress distribution change during plugging. This work investigates the effects on the stress field before and after plugging along the fracture extension axis by introducing a hydrodynamic plug. With the hydrodynamic plug, fluid flow is constrained by pressure conditions at specific locations in the fracture simulating the LCM. Three different scenarios were considered. First, the efficiency of the bridge is simulated by varying the pressure drop. Second, the location of the bridge inside the fracture and finally a nearly packed fracture. The models are fully coupled and were solved with the finite element method in impermeable and permeable hard rocks. We find that for high‐efficiency bridges, narrower fracture profiles are predicted, which causes the induced closure stresses to increase significantly. On the other hand, when the bridge is close and near the wellbore area, the fracture profiles are maintained wide and narrow when it is nearest to the tip. The predicted fracture geometry induces higher closure stresses when the plug is near the well and slightly reduces when it is near the tip. Finally, the pressure profile resulting from the packed fracture significantly affects the fracture dimensions, resulting in narrower fracture, however resulting in a smooth variation of induced closure stresses with high magnitude comparable to the stresses at the state of propagation. The diffusion occurring in the permeable case creates back‐stresses that appear to have an additive contribution to the induced closure stresses. This underlines the significance of diffusion on the induced coupled closure stresses for large fractures while performing wellbore strengthening methodologies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Rock Mechanics and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Engineering, Oil and Gas Program University of Nicosia Nicosia Cyprus
Department of Civil Engineering and Geomatics Cyprus University of Technology Limassol Cyprus
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Stabilizing the wellbore to prevent lost circulation
2. 10.2118/174088-PA10.2118/174088-PA ↗
3. 10.2118/181747-PA10.2118/181747-PA ↗
4. 10.1016/j.petrol.2015.04.00710.1016/j.petrol.2015.04.007 ↗
5. 10.1007/s13202-018-0458-z10.1007/s13202-018-0458-z ↗
6. AlbertyMW McLeanMR.A physical model for stress cages.Proceedings in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.SPE;2004.10.2523/90493-MS ↗
7. 10.2118/187945-PA10.2118/187945-PA ↗
8. DupriestFE.Fracture closure stress (FCS) and lost returns practices.Proceedings in SPE/IADC Drilling Conference.SPE;2005.10.2118/92192-MS ↗
9. 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.05.02610.1016/j.powtec.2020.05.026 ↗
10. 10.2118/125093-PA10.2118/125093-PA ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jngse.2019.10309310.1016/j.jngse.2019.103093 ↗
12. 10.2118/145765-PA10.2118/145765-PA ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.01.02810.1016/j.jngse.2016.01.028 ↗
14. SarrisE AladeyeluA GravanisE.The influence of diffusion in the fracture resistance method for wellbore strengthening: a rock mechanics approach.Proceedings in AIP Conference AIP Publishing;2018;2040(1).10.1063/1.5079204 ↗
15. 10.2118/22581-PA10.2118/22581-PA ↗
16. GuoQ FengYZ JinZH.Fracture aperture for wellbore strengthening applications.Proceedings in 45th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium.ARMA;2011.
17. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.10441610.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104416 ↗
18. AstonMS AlbertyMW DuncumSD BrutonJR FriedheimJE SandersMW.A new treatment for wellbore strengthening in shale.Proceedings in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.SPE;2007.10.2523/110713-MS ↗
19. Investigation of factors for strengthening a wellbore by propping fractures
20. 10.2118/95895-PA10.2118/95895-PA ↗
21. 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.04.02410.1016/j.petrol.2017.04.024 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.07.06710.1016/j.petrol.2018.07.067 ↗
23. GuoQ CookJ WayP JiL FriedheimJE.A comprehensive experimental study on wellbore strengthening. InIADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition.SPE;2014.
24. 10.1115/1.403838110.1115/1.4038381 ↗
25. AstonMS AlbertyMW McLeanMR De JongHJ ArmagostK.Drilling fluids for wellbore strengthening. InIADC/SPE Drilling Conference.SPE;2004.10.2118/87130-MS ↗
26. AlsabaM NygaardR HarelandG ContrerasO.Review of lost circulation materials and treatments with an updated classification. InNational Technical Conference and Exhibition Houston TX. American Association of Drilling Engineers (AADE);2014:1‐9.
27. 10.2118/168001-PA10.2118/168001-PA ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.02.04510.1016/j.jngse.2016.02.045 ↗
29. 10.2118/182266-PA10.2118/182266-PA ↗
30. GaragashD.Hydraulic fracture propagation in elastic rock with large toughness. In4th North American Rock Mechanics Symposium.ARMA;2000.
31. 10.1007/s10704-005-0154-010.1007/s10704-005-0154-0 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10704-010-9515-410.1007/s10704-010-9515-4 ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.000012110.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000121 ↗
34. 10.1002/nag.211110.1002/nag.2111 ↗
35. 10.1002/nag.233010.1002/nag.2330 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.171288610.1063/1.1712886 ↗
37. Detournay E · 1993 · 113
38. 10.1098/rspa.1991.011610.1098/rspa.1991.0116 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.11.01210.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.11.012 ↗
40. Simulia A · 2020
41. 10.1111/gfl.1206110.1111/gfl.12061 ↗
42. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000016910.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000169 ↗
43. 10.1017/S002211200300527510.1017/S0022112003005275 ↗