journal article·2024-11

Meshless method for wave propagation in poroelastic transversely isotropic half‐space with the use of perfectly matched layer

Kamal Shaker, Morteza Eskandari‐Ghadi, Soheil Mohammadi

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Numerical investigation of wave propagation in transversely isotropic poroelastic half‐space with the use of a new stretched coordinate system through the Meshless Local Petrov–Galerkin (MLPG) formulation is presented in this paper. To this end, the u−p formulation of Biot is adopted as the framework of the porous media. One approach to numerically solve the infinite domain problems is the use of an absorber layer in which the whole half‐space is divided into two parts, that is (i) a finite part, in which the responses are interested, and (ii) the remaining semi‐infinite part, which is replaced by a Perfectly Matched Layer (PML). The stretched coordinates in the PML are introduced in such a way that the wave propagating in it does not generate spurious reflection to the finite part. Comparing the numerical results with some existing exact solutions and evaluating the norm of error demonstrate that the response functions in the finite part are achievable as precise as desired. Some new results are also presented which show the validity of the numerical approach in poroelastic transversely isotropic domain.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods · Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil Engineering College of Engineering University of Tehran Tehran Iran

Funding

University of Tehran

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1121/1.190823910.1121/1.1908239 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.172875910.1063/1.1728759 ↗
3. 10.1680/geot.1980.30.4.38510.1680/geot.1980.30.4.385 ↗
4. 10.1002/nag.161008010610.1002/nag.1610080106 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.36622110.1063/1.366221 ↗
6. 10.1115/1.402369210.1115/1.4023692 ↗
7. 10.1121/1.39715310.1121/1.397153 ↗
8. 10.1002/nag.20210.1002/nag.202 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00793-410.1016/S0022-460X(03)00793-4 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.05010.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.050 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.02310.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.023 ↗
12. 10.1002/nag.290410.1002/nag.2904 ↗
13. 10.1002/nag.304710.1002/nag.3047 ↗
14. 10.1177/108128651988392510.1177/1081286519883925 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apm.2019.11.01410.1016/j.apm.2019.11.014 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apm.2019.11.03510.1016/j.apm.2019.11.035 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.09.01610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.09.016 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2016.12.00610.1016/j.enganabound.2016.12.006 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apm.2021.02.01910.1016/j.apm.2021.02.019 ↗
20. 10.1002/nag.337510.1002/nag.3375 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apm.2023.06.01010.1016/j.apm.2023.06.010 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apm.2021.03.05210.1016/j.apm.2021.03.052 ↗
23. 10.1061/JMCEA3.000114410.1061/JMCEA3.0001144 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0168-9274(98)00025-710.1016/S0168-9274(98)00025-7 ↗
25. Givoli D · 2013
26. 10.1785/BSSA067006152910.1785/BSSA0670061529 ↗
27. 10.1016/0165-2125(90)90043-410.1016/0165-2125(90)90043-4 ↗
28. 10.1016/0045-7825(93)90021-O10.1016/0045-7825(93)90021-O ↗
29. 10.1190/1.144303510.1190/1.1443035 ↗
30. Manolis GD · 1988
31. 10.1785/012012006110.1785/0120120061 ↗
32. 10.1006/jcph.1994.115910.1006/jcph.1994.1159 ↗
33. 10.1016/B978-012170960-0/50046-310.1016/B978-012170960-0/50046-3 ↗
34. 10.1002/mop.465007130410.1002/mop.4650071304 ↗
35. 10.1142/S0218396X9600011810.1142/S0218396X96000118 ↗
36. 10.1121/1.41711810.1121/1.417118 ↗
37. 10.1121/1.42681210.1121/1.426812 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0045-7825(02)00642-410.1016/S0045-7825(02)00642-4 ↗
39. 10.1002/nme.89610.1002/nme.896 ↗
40. 10.1121/1.136978310.1121/1.1369783 ↗
41. 10.1002/nme.478010.1002/nme.4780 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cma.2021.11391310.1016/j.cma.2021.113913 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.cma.2021.11370410.1016/j.cma.2021.113704 ↗
44. 10.1002/nme.162037020510.1002/nme.1620370205 ↗
45. 10.1007/s00466005034610.1007/s004660050346 ↗
46. 10.1002/1097-0207(20010210)50:4<937::AID-NME62>3.0.CO;2-X10.1002/1097-0207(20010210)50:4<937::AID-NME62>3.0.CO;2-X ↗
47. PerazzoF MiquelJ.Interpolation in the FPM.Elsevier.
48. Atluri SN · 2004
49. 10.1086/11216410.1086/112164 ↗
50. 10.1093/mnras/181.3.37510.1093/mnras/181.3.375 ↗
51. 10.1002/fld.165020082410.1002/fld.1650200824 ↗
52. 10.1007/s11012‐015‐0340‐810.1007/s11012‐015‐0340‐8 ↗
53. 10.1007/BF0036425210.1007/BF00364252 ↗
54. PowellMJD The theory of radial basic function approximation. Advances in numerical analysis. Vol.II.1992.10.1093/oso/9780198534396.003.0003 ↗
55. 10.1002/nme.162012101010.1002/nme.1620121010 ↗
56. 10.1007/s00466005028610.1007/s004660050286 ↗
57. 10.1002/nme.162024020610.1002/nme.1620240206 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2009.06.00410.1016/j.enganabound.2009.06.004 ↗
59. 10.1002/nme.162033070310.1002/nme.1620330703 ↗
60. 10.1002/nme.81710.1002/nme.817 ↗
61. Arbitrary placement of secondary nodes, and error control, in the meshless local Petrov‐Galerkin (MLPG) method
62. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2760(19970820)15:6<363::AID-MOP8>3.0.CO;2-C10.1002/(SICI)1098-2760(19970820)15:6<363::AID-MOP8>3.0.CO;2-C ↗
63. 10.1115/1.155343210.1115/1.1553432 ↗
64. 10.1137/010500610.1137/0105006 ↗
65. 10.2307/200194210.2307/2001942 ↗
66. 10.1121/1.39844810.1121/1.398448 ↗