Numerical analysis of frost effects in porous media. Benefits and limits of the finite element poroelasticity formulation
Source abstract
Abstract
SUMMARY The aim of this paper is to analyse the performance of a finite element formulation usable for predicting the mechanical consequences of frost effects on porous media. It considers the characteristics of porous media and how the frost action can be assessed. The problem is then separated into two parts: thermal and poromechanical calculations. The constitutive equations developed in the framework of poromechanics are presented and the implementation in a usual finite element poroelasticity formulation based on Zuber's method is adopted. An analysis of the time‐step influence on the convergence rate is given and leads us to propose a simple method in order to obtain objectivity of the finite element response and avoid over‐long calculations. Frost effect simulations are carried out on real porous media (two fired clays) as a case study. Although the experimental behaviour of the porous media subjected to frost action is in accordance with some observations, the calculated strains appear to be overestimated compared with measurements. The problem could be largely attributable to the difficulty of assessing permeability evolution during frost development. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Climate change and permafrost · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Powers TC · 1949 · 184
2. Powers TC · 1953 · 285
3. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1972.tb13393.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1972.tb13393.x ↗
4. Dependence of frost resistance on the pore structure of mortar containing silica fume
5. Setzer MJ · 1976 · 312
6. Evaluation of frost resistance of pressed ceramic products based on the dimensional distribution of pores
7. Frost resistance and pore size distribution in bricks
8. The relation between pore structure and durability of bricks
9. Pore structure and frost durability of clay bricks10.1007/BF02472325 ↗
10. 10.1016/S1065-7355(97)00011-410.1016/S1065-7355(97)00011-4 ↗
11. 10.1016/0022-3093(93)90467-C10.1016/0022-3093(93)90467-C ↗
12. 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00002-210.1016/S0008-8846(99)00002-2 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.06.00610.1016/j.cemconres.2007.06.006 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.04.00110.1016/j.jmps.2005.04.001 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00405-110.1016/S0008-8846(00)00405-1 ↗
16. 10.1007/BF0248063410.1007/BF02480634 ↗
17. Coussy O · 2004
18. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb06413.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb06413.x ↗
19. 10.1002/nag.68910.1002/nag.689 ↗
20. Determination of pore‐size distribution from freezing‐point depression
21. General theory of three‐dimensional consolidation
22. 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x ↗
23. http://www‐cast3m.cea.fr/cast3m/html/ManuelCastemEnsta/node4.html.
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.07210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.072 ↗
25. WardehG.Les phénomènes de gel‐dégel dans les matériaux à base de terre cuite et les conséquences sur leur durabilité. Expériences et modélisation. Ph.D. Thesis Toulouse University France 2005.
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.01.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.01.004 ↗
27. Matala S · 1995
28. GrantSA.Physical and chemical factors affecting contaminant hydrology in cold environment. Technical TR‐00‐21 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ERDC/CRREC 2000.
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.11.00110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.11.001 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00071-110.1016/S0008-8846(03)00071-1 ↗