journal article·2023-06Open access

Numerical investigation of slurry property effect on grouting and blocking of flowing water in rock fractures

Dongdong Pan, Yichi Zhang, Zehua Bu, Zhenhao Xu

Abstract

Abstract In order to investigate the slurry flow behavior, our newly proposed numerical method is applied to simulate the fracture grouting with flowing water condition. First, by numerical validation and experiment comparison, the advantages of this method in computation efficiency and accuracy are shown. Second, the initial velocity of water and slurry properties at different levels are selected as the influencing factors, the water reduction effect, grouting pressure, and slurry deposition behavior in different cases are investigated, and the variation characteristics of flow field and slurry outflow are analyzed. The simulation results show that within the range of slurry properties and flow velocity given in this paper, cement slurry cannot seal the water inflow. Instead, quick setting slurry with different material ratios can effectively seal the fracture. The sealing efficiency is more sensitive to the initial flow rate than the slurry property. When the groundwater flow rate is low, the effect of slurry proportion on sealing can be ignored. Meanwhile, slurry properties have more influence on the final grouting pressure. There is an obvious surge in grouting pressure after sealing, which can be used as a criterion for fracture sealing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Rock Mechanics and Modeling

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center Shandong University Jinan Shandong China

School of Qilu Transportation Shandong University Jinan Shandong China

Suzhou Research Institute Shandong University Suzhou Jiangsu China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province · Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.tust.2021.10414610.1016/j.tust.2021.104146 ↗
2. XuZ YuT LinP LiS.Adverse Geology Identification Through Mineral Anomaly Analysis During Tunneling: Methodology and Case Study. Engineering.2023. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2022.09.01310.1016/j.eng.2022.09.013 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tust.2020.10368310.1016/j.tust.2020.103683 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.10589610.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105896 ↗
5. 10.1007/s13146‐016‐0332‐310.1007/s13146‐016‐0332‐3 ↗
6. 10.1002/nag.329910.1002/nag.3299 ↗
7. 10.1002/nag.42110.1002/nag.421 ↗
8. 10.1002/nag.36610.1002/nag.366 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00603‐021‐02423‐010.1007/s00603‐021‐02423‐0 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.tust.2017.08.01610.1016/j.tust.2017.08.016 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.tust.2015.07.01210.1016/j.tust.2015.07.012 ↗
12. 10.1007/s12205‐022‐2129‐310.1007/s12205‐022‐2129‐3 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.27010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.270 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tust.2020.10369510.1016/j.tust.2020.103695 ↗
15. 10.1002/nag.322110.1002/nag.3221 ↗
16. 10.1007/s13146‐020‐00619‐z10.1007/s13146‐020‐00619‐z ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.05.00210.1016/j.jrmge.2016.05.002 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.tust.2019.10314610.1016/j.tust.2019.103146 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.06.00310.1016/j.advwatres.2017.06.003 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.06.01310.1016/j.jrmge.2021.06.013 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tust.2020.10339310.1016/j.tust.2020.103393 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.tust.2018.09.03810.1016/j.tust.2018.09.038 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10706‐012‐9512‐710.1007/s10706‐012‐9512‐7 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.000153710.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.0001537 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.06.01310.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.06.013 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.04.01710.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.04.017 ↗
27. 10.1016/0021‐9991(81)90145‐510.1016/0021‐9991(81)90145‐5 ↗
28. 10.1146/annurev.fl.15.010183.00140110.1146/annurev.fl.15.010183.001401 ↗
29. 10.1002/nag.238710.1002/nag.2387 ↗
30. 10.1002/nag.249510.1002/nag.2495 ↗
31. 10.1002/nag.302310.1002/nag.3023 ↗
32. 10.1002/nag.305310.1002/nag.3053 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.10371710.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103717 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11795910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117959 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.tust.2019.10305110.1016/j.tust.2019.103051 ↗
36. 10.1139/t10‐08610.1139/t10‐086 ↗
37. 10.3390/pr1008144710.3390/pr10081447 ↗
38. 10.1155/2020/494873810.1155/2020/4948738 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.02.00210.1016/j.compgeo.2014.02.002 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10799310.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107993 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.10349710.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103497 ↗
42. 10.1002/nag.78510.1002/nag.785 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.11.00610.1016/j.jrmge.2021.11.006 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.10475610.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104756 ↗
45. 10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG‐798210.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG‐7982 ↗
46. 10.1002/nag.105510.1002/nag.1055 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2013.01.00510.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2013.01.005 ↗
48. 10.1007/978-94-017-3389-210.1007/978-94-017-3389-2 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ces.2012.02.03410.1016/j.ces.2012.02.034 ↗