journal article·1994-01

Finite element modelling of rock‐socketed piles

E. C. Leong, M. F. Randolph

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Rock socketed piles have a number of features which differentiate them from other types of piles. The generally stubby geometry leads to more even distribution of capacity between shaft and base. However, the low ratio of pile modulus to rock modulus leads to high compressibility and this, coupled with a tendency for the load transfer response along the shaft to exhibit strain‐softening, gives rise to an overall response where the shaft capacity may be fully mobilized, and potentially degraded, before significant mobilization of base load. The paper presents results of finite element analyses of the response of rock‐socketed piles, with particular attention to the shaft response with and without intimate base contact. The shaft interface uses a model, developed from principles of tribology, that includes dilation (and strain‐hardening) prior to peak shaft friction, followed by strain‐softening at larger displacements. The results of the study are shown to be consistent with field measurements, and to capture effects of the absolute pile diameter on the peak shaft friction. It is also shown that intimate base contact mitigates significantly the degree of strain‐softening of the shaft response.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Engineering Structural Analysis Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Shear behaviour of regular triangular concrete/rock joints – analysis10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1989)115:5(711) ↗
2. Shear behaviour of regular triangular concrete/rock joints – evaluation10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1989)115:5(711) ↗
3. J. P.CarterandN. P.Balaam AFENA Users' Manual. University of Sydney 1988.
4. 10.1007/BF0101971110.1007/BF01019711 ↗
5. 10.1002/nme.162010041510.1002/nme.1620100415 ↗
6. 10.1002/nme.162015030610.1002/nme.1620150306 ↗
7. Brebbia C. A. · 1980
8. 10.1002/nme.162011021010.1002/nme.1620110210 ↗
9. 10.1002/nme.162011010710.1002/nme.1620110107 ↗
10. 10.1002/nme.162015110510.1002/nme.1620151105 ↗
11. 10.1002/nme.162017010410.1002/nme.1620170104 ↗
12. 10.1002/nme.162019030710.1002/nme.1620190307 ↗
13. 10.1002/nme.162019080810.1002/nme.1620190808 ↗
14. 10.1002/nme.162019100610.1002/nme.1620191006 ↗
15. 10.1016/0045-7949(84)90019-110.1016/0045-7949(84)90019-1 ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:11(2355)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:11(2355) ↗
17. 10.1016/0266-352X(88)90007-910.1016/0266-352X(88)90007-9 ↗
18. 10.1016/0045-7949(88)90172-110.1016/0045-7949(88)90172-1 ↗
19. 10.1002/nme.162012010310.1002/nme.1620120103 ↗
20. 10.1002/nme.162028060210.1002/nme.1620280602 ↗
21. 10.1002/nme.162035010710.1002/nme.1620350107 ↗
22. E. C.Leong ‘A study of internal and external shaft friction of piles’ Ph.D. Thesis The University of Western Australia 1991.
23. I. B.Donald S. W.SloanandH. K.Chiu ‘Theoretical analyses of rock socketed piles’ Proc. Int. Conf. on Struct. Founds. on Rock. Vol. 1 Sydney 1980 pp.303–316.
24. J. O.OsterbergandS. A.Gill ‘Load transfer mechanism for piers socketed in hard soils or rock’ Proc. 9th Can. Symp. on Rock Mech. Montreal Que. Canada 1973 pp.235–262.
25. 10.1139/t79-05410.1139/t79-054 ↗
26. R. K.RoweandP. J. N.Pells ‘A theoretical study of pile‐rock socket behaviour’ Proc. Int. Conf. on Struct. Founds. on Rock Vol.1 Sydney 1980 pp.253–264.
27. A model for the mechanics of jointed rock10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001133 ↗
28. Goodman R. E. · 1971 · 1379
29. C. M.Haberfied ‘The performance of the pressuremeter and socketed piles in weak rock’ Ph.D. Thesis Monash University Melbourne Australia 1987.
30. A. F.Williams ‘The design and performance of piles socketed into weak rock’ Ph.D. Thesis Monash University Melbourne Australia 1980.
31. 10.1139/t87-01010.1139/t87-010 ↗
32. L. H.Ooi G. F.BoeyandJ. P.Carter ‘Finite element analysis of dilatant concrete rock interfaces’ Proc. 5th Conf. Australia on Finite Element Methods Melbourne 1987 pp.157–162.
33. K. A.PeaseandF. H.Kulhawy ‘Load transfer mechanisms in rock‐sockets and anchors’ Report No. EL‐3777 EPRI Palo Alto Ca. 1984 pp.102.
34. T. S. K.Lam ‘Shear behaviour of concrete‐rock joints’ Ph.D. Thesis Monash University Melbourne Australia 1983.
35. 10.1002/nag.161016090310.1002/nag.1610160903 ↗
36. Finite element for rock joints and interfaces10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001936 ↗
37. 10.1016/0148-9062(85)92948-110.1016/0148-9062(85)92948-1 ↗
38. Mechanical properties of rock‐joints10.1016/0148-9062(85)92063-7 ↗
39. R. E.Goodman ‘The mechanical properties of joints’ Proc. 3rd Congr. ISRM. Vol. 1A Denver 1974 pp.127–140.
40. Fundamentals of rock joint deformation10.1016/0148-9062(83)90595-8 ↗
41. 10.1007/BF0103021610.1007/BF01030216 ↗
42. 10.1016/0013-7952(75)90014-910.1016/0013-7952(75)90014-9 ↗
43. Geomechanical model for rock foundation settlement10.1061/AJGEB6.0000582 ↗
44. A. F.Williams I. B.DonaldandH. K.Chiu ‘Stress distributions in rock socketed piles’ Proc. Int. Conf. on Struct. Founds. on Rock Vol. 1 Sydney 1980 pp.317–325.
45. R. J.JewellandM. F.Randolph ‘Cyclic rod shear tests in calcareous sediments’ Proc. Int. Conf. on Calcareous Sediments Vol. 1 Perth Western Australia 1988 pp.215–222.
46. A. M.Hyden J. M.HulettandA. F.Abbs ‘Design practice for grouted piles in Bass Strait calcareous soils’ Proc. Int. Conf. on Calcareous Sediments Vol. 1 Perth Western Australia 1988 pp.297–304.
47. M. F.Randolph ‘The axial capacity of deep foundations in calcareous soil’ Proc. Int. Conf. Calcareous Sediments Vol. 2 Perth Western Australia 1988 pp.837–857.
48. M.Fahey R.J.Jewell M. S.KhorshidandM. F.Randolph ‘Parameter selection for pile design in calcareous sediments’Predictive Soil Mechanics Proc Wroth Mem. Symp. Oxford pp.261–278.