journal article·2025-04

Dynamic Torsional Response of Pile in Fractional‐Order Viscoelastic Unsaturated Transversely Isotropic Soil With Imperfect Contact

Wenjie Ma, Eng‐Choon Leong, Xu Wang, Binglong Wang, Changdan Wang, Bolin Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT A novel theoretical model is proposed to investigate the torsional response of a pile in fractional‐order viscoelastic unsaturated transversely isotropic soil with imperfect contact. This model employs Biot's framework for three‐phase porous media along with the theory of fractional derivatives. Unlike previous models that assume continuous displacement at the pile–soil interface, this study uses the Kelvin model to simulate relative slippage between pile–soil contact surfaces (imperfect contact). Incorporating fractional‐order viscoelastic and transversely isotropic models to describe the stress‐strain relationship, comprehensive dynamic governing equations are derived. Using the separation of variables method, inverse Fourier transform, and convolution theory, analytical solutions for the frequency domain response and semi‐analytical solutions for the time domain response of the pile head under semi‐sine pulse excitation are obtained. Using numerical examples, the effects of model parameters in the fractional‐order viscoelastic constitutive model, pile–soil relative slip and continuity model, and soil anisotropy on the torsional complex impedance, twist angle, and torque are presented.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil Engineering Lanzhou Jiaotong University Lanzhou Gansu China

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Nanyang Technological University Singapore Singapore

Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education Tongji University Shanghai China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/AJGEB6.000062710.1061/AJGEB6.0000627 ↗
2. 10.1680/geot.53.10.847.3751810.1680/geot.53.10.847.37518 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11242‐018‐1054‐x10.1007/s11242‐018‐1054‐x ↗
4. 10.1007/s11440‐022‐01772‐610.1007/s11440‐022‐01772‐6 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10536110.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105361 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.10474010.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104740 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.apor.2020.10211010.1016/j.apor.2020.102110 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.10391710.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103917 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.10876010.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108760 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.06.01310.1016/j.compgeo.2007.06.013 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jsv.2009.06.01710.1016/j.jsv.2009.06.017 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.08.02610.1016/j.jsv.2017.08.026 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.10385410.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103854 ↗
14. 10.1080/17486025.2022.202995410.1080/17486025.2022.2029954 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.12.00910.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.12.009 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.12.01410.1016/j.compgeo.2018.12.014 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.11325310.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113253 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11440‐021‐01274‐x10.1007/s11440‐021‐01274‐x ↗
19. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.10729610.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107296 ↗
20. 10.1002/nag.343210.1002/nag.3432 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.10779910.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107799 ↗
22. 10.12989/sem.2000.10.4.29910.12989/sem.2000.10.4.299 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.02.00110.1016/j.compgeo.2007.02.001 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apm.2022.07.01710.1016/j.apm.2022.07.017 ↗
25. 10.1002/nag.329010.1002/nag.3290 ↗
26. 10.1002/nag.338910.1002/nag.3389 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.10611510.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106115 ↗
28. 10.1139/t96‐06510.1139/t96‐065 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2003.10.00110.1016/j.wavemoti.2003.10.001 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.11462910.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114629 ↗
31. 10.1002/nag.338210.1002/nag.3382 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.11500010.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115000 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2020.10.00710.1016/j.enganabound.2020.10.007 ↗
34. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090‐0241(1997)123:12(1118)10.1061/(ASCE)1090‐0241(1997)123:12(1118) ↗
35. 10.1007/s11242‐006‐9059‐210.1007/s11242‐006‐9059‐2 ↗
36. 10.1007/s40534‐020‐00214‐x10.1007/s40534‐020‐00214‐x ↗
37. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2022.10.00610.1016/j.enganabound.2022.10.006 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.apm.2021.11.02210.1016/j.apm.2021.11.022 ↗
39. 10.1002/nag.359510.1002/nag.3595 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10548210.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105482 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.10613110.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106131 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jsv.2024.11861510.1016/j.jsv.2024.118615 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.10460710.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104607 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10486310.1016/j.jobe.2022.104863 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.11724110.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117241 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2020.07.00610.1016/j.enganabound.2020.07.006 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.10717110.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107171 ↗
48. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9410(1991)117:3(429)10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9410(1991)117:3(429) ↗
49. 10.1007/s11440‐019‐00866‐y10.1007/s11440‐019‐00866‐y ↗
50. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.11208010.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112080 ↗
51. 10.1007/s11440‐023‐01931‐310.1007/s11440‐023‐01931‐3 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.camwa.2019.08.03310.1016/j.camwa.2019.08.033 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2022.01.00610.1016/j.enganabound.2022.01.006 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.apm.2023.04.02210.1016/j.apm.2023.04.022 ↗
55. 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x ↗
56. Coussy O. · 1995
57. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.10881210.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108812 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.11948310.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119483 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.10905310.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109053 ↗
60. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:2(147)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:2(147) ↗
61. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9399(1986)112:11(1241)10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9399(1986)112:11(1241) ↗
62. 10.1016/S0267‐7261(00)00072‐510.1016/S0267‐7261(00)00072‐5 ↗
63. 10.3901/JME.2005.01.15710.3901/JME.2005.01.157 ↗