journal article·2022-11-07Open access

Study of Marine Particles Using Submersible Digital Holographic Camera during the Arctic Expedition

Victor Dyomin, Igor Semiletov, Denis Chernykh, Elena Chertoprud, Alexandra Davydova, Nikolay Kirillov, Olga Konovalova, Alexey Olshukov, Aleksandr Osadchiev, Igor Polovtsev

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 21

Abstract

The paper presents the results of in situ studies of marine particles of different nature using a submersible digital holographic camera (DHC) during the Arctic expedition. It also describes the features, performance specifications, and possibilities of the DHC and the DHC technology. The DHC technology can be used for noninvasive automatic evaluation of spatial and temporal characteristics of plankton, including the distribution of plankton concentrations. The comparison of quantitative analysis of zooplankton net samples and classification results using the DHC revealed that the error of the DHC classification of mesoplankton at the level of the main systematic orders was about 30%. The results of determining the data on the medium, such as water turbidity, according to the radiation shielding factor (degree) by the particles of the Suspension taxon using the DHC technology are presented; the prospects for studying the size of gas bubbles and their volume content according to the Bubble taxon data are shown. The use of holographic data for in situ point estimates is considered.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena · Geological Studies and Exploration · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory for Radiophysical and Optical Methods of Environmental Research, National Research Tomsk State University, 36 Lenin Avenue, 634050 Tomsk, Russia

Laboratory for Integrated Research of the Arctic Land-Shelf System, National Research Tomsk State University, 36 Lenin Avenue, 634050 Tomsk, Russia

Laboratory of Arctic Research, V.I. Il’ichov Pacific Oceanological Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 43 Baltic Street, 690041 Vladivostok, Russia

A. N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 33 Leninsky Prt., 119071 Moscow, Russia

Marine Research Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 1, p. 77 Leninskie Gory, 119992 Moscow, Russia

Shirshov Institute of Oceanology of Russian Academy of Sciences, 36 Nakhimovskiy Prospect, 117997 Moscow, Russia

Funding

Tomsk State University Development Program · Russian Science Foundation

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Globally Consistent Quantitative Observations of Planktonic Ecosystems10.3389/fmars.2019.00196 ↗
2. Comparing Vertical Distributions of Chl-a Fluorescence, Marine Snow, and Taxon-Specific Zooplankton in Relation to Density Using High-Resolution Optical Measurements10.3389/fmars.2020.00602 ↗
3. Climate effects on temporal and spatial dynamics of phytoplankton and zooplankton in the Barents Sea10.1016/j.pocean.2020.102320 ↗
4. Monitoring of Plankton Spatial and Temporal Characteristics with the Use of a Submersible Digital Holographic Camera10.3389/fmars.2020.00653 ↗
5. Diverse effects of invasive ecosystem engineers on marine biodiversity and ecosystem functions: A global review and meta-analysis10.1111/gcb.14007 ↗
6. Meta-analysis reveals complex marine biological responses to the interactive effects of ocean acidification and warming10.1002/ece3.516 ↗
7. Tracks in the Snow—Advantage of Combining Optical Methods to Characterize Marine Particles and Aggregates10.3389/fmars.2020.00476 ↗
8. Seasonal methane accumulation and release from a gas emission site in the central North Sea10.5194/bg-12-5261-2015 ↗
9. Multi-Instrument Assessment of Phytoplankton Abundance and Cell Sizes in Mono-Specific Laboratory Cultures and Whole Plankton Community Composition in the North Atlantic10.3389/fmars.2020.00254 ↗
10. Transport and bottom accumulation of fine river sediments under typhoon conditions and associated submarine landslides: Case study of the Peinan River, Taiwan10.5194/nhess-16-41-2016 ↗
11. Osadchiev, A., Silvestrova, K., and Myslenkov, S. (2020). Wind-Driven Coastal Upwelling near Large River Deltas in the Laptev and East-Siberian Seas. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12050844 ↗
12. Amount and Fate of Gas and Oil Discharged at 3400 m Water Depth from a Natural Seep Site in the Southern Gulf of Mexico10.3389/fmars.2019.00700 ↗
13. Kopelevich, O.V. (2001, January 8–12). The Current Low-Parametric Models of Seawater Optical Properties. Proceedings of the International Conference “Current Problems in Optics of Natural Waters”, St. Petersburg, Russia.
14. A Mathematical Model of Laser Radiation Propagation in Seawater10.1134/S0030400X1910014X ↗
15. An optical classification of coastal and oceanic waters based on the specific spectral absorption curves of phytoplankton pigments, dissolved organic matter, and other particulate materials110.4319/lo.1981.26.4.0671 ↗
16. Memmolo, P., Carcagnì, P., Bianco, V., Merola, F., Goncalves da Silva Junior, A., Garcia Goncalves, L.M., Ferraro, P., and Distante, C. (2020). Learning Diatoms Classification from a Dry Test Slide by Holographic Microscopy. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20216353 ↗
17. Imaging without lenses: Achievements and remaining challenges of wide-field on-chip microscopy10.1038/nmeth.2114 ↗
18. Liu, T., and Jiang, S. (2018). Miniaturized digital inline holographic camera for in-situ plankton detection. Advanced Sensor Systems and Applications VIII, SPIE.
19. Microplastic pollution monitoring with holographic classification and deep learning10.1088/2515-7647/abf250 ↗
20. Holography of particles for diagnostics tasks [Invited]10.1364/AO.58.00G300 ↗
21. Bjelkhagen, H.I., and Bove, V.M. (2019). Digital holographic camera for plankton monitoring. Practical Holography XXXIII: Displays, Materials, and Applications, SPIE.
22. Evaluation of Algorithms for Automatic Data Extraction from Digital Holographic Images of Particles10.1007/s11182-016-0669-z ↗
23. Fast recognition of marine particles in underwater digital holography
24. Data acquisition from digital holograms of particles
25. A Review of Holography in the Aquatic Sciences: In situ Characterization of Particles, Plankton, and Small Scale Biophysical Interactions10.3389/fmars.2020.572147 ↗
26. A hybrid image processing method for measuring 3D bubble distribution using digital inline holography10.1016/j.ces.2019.07.009 ↗
27. Microplastic pollution assessment with digital holography and zero-shot learning10.1063/5.0093439 ↗
28. Identification of Microplastics Based on the Fractal Properties of Their Holographic Fingerprint10.1021/acsphotonics.1c00591 ↗
29. Phenotypic Analysis of Microalgae Populations Using Label-Free Imaging Flow Cytometry and Deep Learning10.1021/acsphotonics.1c00220 ↗
30. Self-propelling bacteria mimic coherent light decorrelation10.1364/OE.23.009388 ↗
31. Extensive methane venting to the atmosphere from sediments of the East Siberian Arctic Shelf10.1126/science.1182221 ↗
32. Ebullition and storm-induced methane release from the East Siberian Arctic Shelf10.1038/ngeo2007 ↗
33. The East Siberian Arctic Shelf: Towards further assessment of permafrost-related methane fluxes and role of sea ice10.1098/rsta.2014.0451 ↗
34. Shakhova, N., Semiletov, I., and Chuvilin, E. (2019). Understanding the Permafrost–Hydrate System and Associated Methane Releases in the East Siberian Arctic Shelf. Geosciences, 9.10.3390/geosciences9060251 ↗
35. Colier, R., Burckhardt, C., and Lin, L. (1971). Optical Holography, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-181050-4.50022-6 ↗
36. Picart, P. (2015). New Techniques in Digital Holography, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781119091745 ↗
37. Schnars, U., and Jueptner, W. (2005). Digital Holography, Springer.
38. Holographic particle sizing techniques10.1088/0022-3735/7/10/001 ↗
39. (2022, October 13). Allied Vision—Industrial Cameras for Machine and Embedded Vision—Allied Vision. Available online: https://www.alliedvision.com/en/.
40. Automated phase unwrapping in digital holography with deep learning10.1364/BOE.440338 ↗
41. Phase unwrapping in digital holography based on non-subsampled contourlet transform10.1016/j.optcom.2017.09.057 ↗
42. Bjelkhagen, H.I., and Lee, S.-H. (2021). Digital hologram as a display optical system. Practical Holography XXXV: Displays, Materials, and Applications, SPIE.
43. Development and deployment of a point-source digital inline holographic microscope for the study of plankton and particles to a depth of 6000 m10.4319/lom.2013.11.28 ↗
44. Zooplankton fecal pellets, marine snow, phytodetritus and the ocean’s biological pump10.1016/j.pocean.2014.08.005 ↗
45. Simultaneous in-line and off-axis subsea holographic recording of plankton and other marine particles10.1088/0957-0233/12/8/101 ↗
46. Atmospheric carbon emission from North Asian Lakes: A factor of global significance10.1016/1352-2310(95)00426-2 ↗
47. Chernykh, D., Yusupov, V., Salomatin, A., Kosmach, D., Shakhova, N., Gershelis, E., Konstantinov, A., Grinko, A., Chuvilin, E., and Dudarev, O. (2020). Sonar estimation of methane bubble flux from thawing subsea permafrost: A case study from the laptev sea shelf. Geosci., 10.10.3390/geosciences10100411 ↗
48. Dhargalkar, V.K., and Verlecar, X.N. (2004). Zooplankton Methodology, Collection & Identification—A Field Manual, National Institute of Oceanography.
49. Zooplankton of the Black Sea and the Eastern Mediterranean: Similarities and dissimilarities10.12681/mms.277 ↗
50. Zooplankton biomass estimated from digitalized images in Antarctic waters: A calibration exercise
51. Zooplankton biomass estimation from digitized images: A comparison between subtropical and Antarctic organisms10.4319/lom.2009.7.304 ↗
52. Functional regression equations for zooplankton displacement volume wet weight, dry weight, and carbon: A correction
53. Influence of gas hydrate formation on methane seeps at the bottom of water reservoirs10.1016/j.rgg.2017.08.006 ↗
54. (2011). 26th ITTC Specialist Committee. Fresh Water and Seawater Properties. Int. Towing Tank Conf., 5, 1596–1599.
55. Sonar gas flux estimation by bubble insonification: Application to methane bubble flux from seep areas in the outer Laptev Sea10.5194/tc-11-1333-2017 ↗
56. Hayward, P.J., and Ryland, J.S. (2017). Handbook of the Marine Fauna of North-West Europe, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549443.001.0001 ↗
57. (2022, August 22). Diversity and Geographic Distribution of Pelagic Copepoda. Available online: https://copepodes.obs-banyuls.fr/en/diversite_geo_b.php.
58. The hydroacoustic method for the quantification of the gas flux from a submersed bubble plume10.1134/S0001437010060202 ↗
59. Acoustic investigations of gas “flares” in the Sea of Okhotsk10.1134/S0001437011050134 ↗
60. An acoustic estimate of methane concentration in a water column in regions of methane bubble release10.1134/S1063771014050133 ↗
61. Effects of climate change on methane emissions from seafloor sediments in the Arctic Ocean: A review10.1002/lno.10307 ↗
62. Massive blow-out craters formed by hydrate-controlled methane expulsion from the Arctic seafloor10.1126/science.aal4500 ↗
63. A wideband acoustic method for direct assessment of bubble-mediated methane flux10.1016/j.csr.2018.12.005 ↗
64. Acoustic investigations of the deepest methane seeps in the Okhotsk sea10.18799/24131830/2021/10/3286 ↗
65. Bottom Sediments Reveal inter-Annual Variability of interaction between the ob and Yenisei plumes in the Kara Sea10.1038/s41598-019-55242-3 ↗