journal article·2019-02-10Open access

Evaluation of foam conditioning effect on groundwater inflow at tunnel cutting face

Xiao‐Xue Liu, Shui‐Long Shen, Annan Zhou, Ye‐Shuang Xu

Abstract

Summary This paper presents an analytical evaluation on the influence of foam conditioning on groundwater inflow at shield tunnel cutting face by the force‐equilibrium principle. Three key variables are highlighted, namely, the maximum foam infiltration distance, the critical infiltration distance, and the hydraulic conductivity of foam‐conditioned soil or rock fissure. To capture the variation of water level induced by foam injection, a dynamic water‐level equation is considered in the force‐equilibrium principle. The proposed analytical equations are employed to analyze a water inflow case during shield tunneling in a weathered mylonite fault. The results indicate that the hydraulic conductivity of foam‐conditioned mylonite and the infiltration distance decrease with an increase of shear stress of foam fluid. A three‐dimensional finite element model is employed to validate the analytical solutions. The comparison between the observed and calculated results confirms that the proposed method can predict groundwater inflow in foam‐conditioned soils.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean, and Civil Engineering Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai China

Civil and Infrastructure Discipline, School of Engineering Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) Melbourne Victoria Australia

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. Cutter‐disc consumption during earth pressure balance tunnelling in mixed strata, geotechnical engineering
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000108210.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001082 ↗
3. 10.3390/su806057310.3390/su8060573 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.03.05110.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.03.051 ↗
5. 10.1002/nag.276010.1002/nag.2760 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tust.2017.12.02110.1016/j.tust.2017.12.021 ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.000081010.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000810 ↗
8. 10.1139/cgj-2014-028910.1139/cgj-2014-0289 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.tust.2018.04.00910.1016/j.tust.2018.04.009 ↗
10. 10.1139/cgj-2013-004210.1139/cgj-2013-0042 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11069-013-0863-z10.1007/s11069-013-0863-z ↗
12. 10.1139/cgj-2014-028510.1139/cgj-2014-0285 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.tust.2017.10.00610.1016/j.tust.2017.10.006 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tust.2005.11.00210.1016/j.tust.2005.11.002 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.10.01010.1016/j.jrmge.2015.10.010 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.tust.2013.10.01310.1016/j.tust.2013.10.013 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11440-017-0586-510.1007/s11440-017-0586-5 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.01.02310.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.01.023 ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000105810.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001058 ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000094710.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000947 ↗
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000118110.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001181 ↗
22. 10.1139/cgj-2017-035510.1139/cgj-2017-0355 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.tust.2017.12.02610.1016/j.tust.2017.12.026 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.minpro.2011.11.00110.1016/j.minpro.2011.11.001 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tust.2017.10.00210.1016/j.tust.2017.10.002 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.finel.2018.02.00310.1016/j.finel.2018.02.003 ↗
27. 10.2136/sssaj2006.013810.2136/sssaj2006.0138 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.04.00310.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.04.003 ↗
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000052710.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000527 ↗
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000105910.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001059 ↗
31. Research on soil conditioning for earth pressure balance shield tunneling in Lanzhou sandy pebble strata with rich water
32. 10.1016/j.tust.2015.08.00610.1016/j.tust.2015.08.006 ↗
33. Milligan G · 2000
34. 10.1016/j.tust.2017.09.01810.1016/j.tust.2017.09.018 ↗
35. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000143710.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001437 ↗
36. 10.1002/nag.271410.1002/nag.2714 ↗
37. 10.3390/app807105110.3390/app8071051 ↗
38. Prediction model of TBM disc cutter wear during tunnelling in heterogeneous ground
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000144110.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001441 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.07.01410.1016/j.compgeo.2017.07.014 ↗
41. Case study: dewatering‐induced building settlement around a deep excavation in the soft deposit of Tianjin, China
42. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.000079110.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000791 ↗
43. Research on soil conditioning experiments of EPB shield by excavating sandy cobble strata
44. Soil conditioning of waterless sand‐pebble stratum in EPB tunnel construction
45. 10.1016/j.tust.2008.05.00310.1016/j.tust.2008.05.003 ↗
46. 10.1139/T10-01310.1139/T10-013 ↗
47. DangTS MeschkeG WesselsN HacklK.Coupled computational simulation of excavation and soil transport in earth‐pressure balance shield tunneling machines using a viscous two‐phase fluid model for soil‐foam mixtures. Proceedings of Geo‐Shanghai Conference Shanghai2014;780–789.10.1061/9780784413449.076 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.tust.2018.02.01110.1016/j.tust.2018.02.011 ↗
49. The performance of foams in shield tunnelling method and its effect on the soil conditioning
50. Jancsecz S · 1994 · 531
51. 10.1016/S0886-7798(98)00045-510.1016/S0886-7798(98)00045-5 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.02.01510.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.02.015 ↗
53. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000093210.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000932 ↗
54. Face stability in slurry and EPB shield tunnelling
55. SEM microstructure and chemical foamed‐soil modification tests for swelling red strata in subway shield tunneling engineering
56. 10.3844/ajessp.2010.365.37010.3844/ajessp.2010.365.370 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.01110.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.011 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.03.01110.1016/j.compgeo.2015.03.011 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.06510.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.065 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.07510.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.075 ↗
61. Bear J · 1979
62. 10.1139/t11-04910.1139/t11-049 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.05.01110.1016/j.enggeo.2017.05.011 ↗
64. Groundwater inflow during tunnel driving
65. 10.1016/j.tust.2007.02.00410.1016/j.tust.2007.02.004 ↗
66. 10.1016/S0886-7798(02)00102-510.1016/S0886-7798(02)00102-5 ↗
67. 10.1007/s10064-016-0910-610.1007/s10064-016-0910-6 ↗