journal article·2020-02-10

Numerical modeling of strongly coupled microscale multiphase flow and solid deformation

Samuel Fagbemi, Pejman Tahmasebi, Mohammad Piri

Publisher page

Abstract

Summary When fluid flows in porous media under subsurface conditions, significant deformation can occur. Such deformation is dependent on structural and phase characteristics. In this paper, we investigate the effect of multiphase flow on the deformation of porous media at the pore scale by implementing a strongly coupled partitioned solver discretized with finite volume (FV) technique. Specifically, the role of capillary forces on grain deformation in porous media is investigated. The fluid and solid subdomains are meshed using unstructured independent grids. The model is applied for solving multiphase coupled equations and is capable of capturing pore scale physics during primary drainage by solving the Navier‐Stokes equation and advecting fluid indicator function using volume of fluid (VOF) while the fluid is interacting with a nonlinear elastic solid matrix. The convergence of the coupled solver is accelerated by Aitken underrelaxation. We also reproduce geomechanical stress conditions, at the pore scale, by applying uniaxial stress on the solid while simultaneously solving the multiphase fluid‐solid interaction problem to investigate the effect of external stress on fluid occupancy, velocity‐field distribution, and relative permeability. We observe that the solid matrix exhibits elasto‐capillary behavior during the drainage sequence. Relative permeability endpoints are shifted on the basis of the external stress exerted.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions · Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Petroleum Engineering University of Wyoming Laramie Wyoming 82071 U.S.A

Department of Civil Engineering University of Wyoming Laramie Wyoming 82071 U.S.A

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10237-010-0189-710.1007/s10237-010-0189-7 ↗
2. 10.1017/jfm.2016.66910.1017/jfm.2016.669 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.07110.1016/j.energy.2016.09.071 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11433-012-4982-410.1007/s11433-012-4982-4 ↗
5. 10.1029/2017WR02224210.1029/2017WR022242 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.10.01810.1016/j.advwatres.2018.10.018 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.07.01810.1016/j.ijggc.2018.07.018 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.06.00810.1016/j.jcp.2016.06.008 ↗
9. AlvarezJB.Interaction of multiphase fluids and solids: theory algorithms and applications. March;2017.
10. Finite element analysis of deformation mechanism for porous materials under fluid‐solid interaction
11. 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.02.02810.1016/j.cageo.2012.02.028 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.10.02210.1016/j.enggeo.2013.10.022 ↗
13. PopovP EfendievY HouTY.Multiscale finite element methods for linear.2009:13‐47.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09496-010.1007/978-0-387-09496-0 ↗
14. 10.1080/00036811.2013.83978010.1080/00036811.2013.839780 ↗
15. IlievO MikelicA PopovP.Fluid structure interaction problems in deformable porous media: toward permeability of deformable porous media. 65 Institut Techo‐ und Wirschaftsmathematik;2004.
16. 10.1016/j.cma.2016.05.02110.1016/j.cma.2016.05.021 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.01.01010.1016/j.compstruc.2007.01.010 ↗
18. 10.1088/0953-8984/22/49/49310110.1088/0953-8984/22/49/493101 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.11.01410.1016/j.tecto.2013.11.014 ↗
20. WitteveenJAS BijlH.Explicit mesh deformation using inverse distance weighting interpolation. In: 19th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference;2009;San Antonio TX:2009‐3996.https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-399610.2514/6.2009-3996 ↗
21. Deparis S · 2016 · 439
22. BeaudoinM JasakH.Development of a generalized grid interface for turbomachinery simulations with OpenFOAM. In: Open Source CFD International Conference;2008;Berlin Germany:2008.
23. 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-510.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ces.2009.03.01810.1016/j.ces.2009.03.018 ↗
25. 10.1017/CBO978051176072310.1017/CBO9780511760723 ↗
26. 10.1016/0021-9991(92)90240-Y10.1016/0021-9991(92)90240-Y ↗
27. Pore‐scale modeling of multiphase flow through porous media under triaxial stress10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.10.018 ↗
28. 10.2514/3.6127310.2514/3.61273 ↗
29. 10.1016/0021-9991(86)90099-910.1016/0021-9991(86)90099-9 ↗
30. 10.2514/3.828410.2514/3.8284 ↗
31. 10.1080/10407790275338502710.1080/104077902753385027 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.11.00310.1016/j.compfluid.2011.11.003 ↗
33. OpenCFD L..OpenCFD Ltd. OpenFOAM Userguide;2009.
34. WellerHG.A new approach to VOF‐based interface capturing methods for incompressible and compressible flow. TR/HGW OpenCFD Ltd;2008.
35. 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.04.01110.1016/j.jcp.2012.04.011 ↗
36. OpenFOAM finite volume solver for fluid‐solid interaction
37. 10.1007/s00466-014-1107-010.1007/s00466-014-1107-0 ↗
38. 10.1002/nme.95910.1002/nme.959 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cma.2004.01.02410.1016/j.cma.2004.01.024 ↗
40. 10.4208/cicp.291210.290411s10.4208/cicp.291210.290411s ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.09.00310.1016/j.compstruc.2009.09.003 ↗
42. 10.1007/s00466-008-0255-510.1007/s00466-008-0255-5 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.12.00610.1016/j.compstruc.2009.12.006 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.11.00610.1016/j.compstruc.2006.11.006 ↗
45. 10.1002/978111938893710.1002/9781119388937 ↗
46. PonweiserT StadelmeyerP KarásekT.Partnership for Advanced Computing in Europe Fluid—Structure Simulations with OpenFOAM for Aircraft Designs.
47. 10.1145/274363.27436410.1145/274363.274364 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.03.01110.1016/j.compgeo.2018.03.011 ↗
49. 10.1002/2017GL07393810.1002/2017GL073938 ↗
50. 10.1147/rd.112.021510.1147/rd.112.0215 ↗
51. Happel J · 2012
52. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.08.01210.1016/j.advwatres.2014.08.012 ↗
53. 10.2118/175172-MS10.2118/175172-MS ↗
54. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.03.00510.1016/j.advwatres.2013.03.005 ↗
55. OjagbohunmiS ChalaturnykR LeungJ.SPE 154083 Coupling of stress dependent relative permeability and reservoir simulation. In: 18th SPE improved oil recovery symposium;2012;New York:837‐848.
56. MorganJT.Co MO. Influence of Pore Geometry on Water‐Oil Relative Permeability;1970.10.2118/2588-PA ↗
57. GawishA.Al‐homadhi E. Relative Permeability Curves for High Pressure High Temperature Reservoir Conditions. Oil and Gas Business;2008.
58. JeanninL AgostiniF.WangY Comptes Rendus Geoscience Stress effects on the relative permeabilities of tight sandstones;2018:110‐118.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2017.09.01810.1016/j.crte.2017.09.018 ↗
59. On finite element analysis of fluid flows coupled with structural interaction
60. 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.04.02810.1016/j.jcp.2008.04.028 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.cma.2003.09.00610.1016/j.cma.2003.09.006 ↗
62. 10.1080/106185603100015477510.1080/1061856031000154775 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.09.01510.1016/j.advwatres.2015.09.015 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevE.98.05290110.1103/PhysRevE.98.052901 ↗
65. 10.1007/s11242-019-01291-110.1007/s11242-019-01291-1 ↗
66. Boundedness—preserving implicit correction of mesh‐induced errors for VoF based heat and mass transfer