A Novel Framework for Reliability Analysis of Rainfall‐Induced Slopes Failure Based on Site‐Specific Data
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Rainfall‐induced slope failure is governed by complex multivariate interactions and inherent spatial variability of soil properties. However, conventional Gaussian‐based reliability models fail to capture the nonlinear dependencies between hydraulic and mechanical parameters and cannot fully utilize limited site‐specific data. This paper develops a Copula‐based conditional random field (Copula‐CRF) framework that explicitly incorporates multivariate non‐Gaussian dependencies and maximizes the use of site‐specific data in probabilistic slope stability evaluation. The framework first identifies optimal Copula structures for multivariate parameters based on site‐specific data and then embeds the identified dependence models into a conditional random field to generate spatially correlated realizations constrained on both hydraulic and mechanical observations. A representative slope case exhibiting failure is analyzed to evaluate the performance of the proposed approach. The Copula‐URF approach yields a failure probability of 0.22, whereas the Copula‐CRF approach yields 0.911, accompanied by a reduction in standard deviation from 0.207 to 0.023. The results indicate that the Copula‐CRF framework provides more realistic reliability estimates than Copula‐URF approaches by fully utilizing available site‐specific data. The performance of the proposed framework is evaluated under varying parameter uncertainties, spatial correlations, rainfall patterns, and site investigation schemes, confirming the robustness and applicability of the approach. Applications of the proposed Copula‐CRF framework demonstrate that it can reliably evaluate the stability of rainfall‐induced slopes with site‐specific data. The method also provides a general reference for reliability analysis and risk‐informed decision‐making in geotechnical engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Landslides and related hazards · Dam Engineering and Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education Beijing China
School of Civil Engineering Beijing Jiaotong University Beijing China
Discipline of Civil, Surveying and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Science and Environment The University of Newcastle Callaghan Australia
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.geosus.2021.09.00110.1016/j.geosus.2021.09.001 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.10754110.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107541 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.10788610.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107886 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ress.2024.11027010.1016/j.ress.2024.110270 ↗
5. 10.1139/cgj‐2022‐067110.1139/cgj‐2022‐0671 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.gsf.2022.10149010.1016/j.gsf.2022.101490 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.10801410.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108014 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.04.00710.1016/j.jrmge.2024.04.007 ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.000030910.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.0000309 ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090‐0241(2004)130:5(507)10.1061/(ASCE)1090‐0241(2004)130:5(507) ↗
11. 10.3208/sandf.50.34310.3208/sandf.50.343 ↗
12. 10.1139/T10‐04410.1139/T10‐044 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.10715910.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107159 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.10313310.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103133 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.10449810.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104498 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.10741510.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107415 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.06.00410.1016/j.compgeo.2018.06.004 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.10.01410.1016/j.compgeo.2016.10.014 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ress.2025.11096110.1016/j.ress.2025.110961 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10605910.1016/j.compgeo.2023.106059 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.10.00510.1016/j.strusafe.2014.10.005 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.10332610.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103326 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.10316210.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103162 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apm.2018.01.03510.1016/j.apm.2018.01.035 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.10828510.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108285 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.10.00310.1016/j.compgeo.2017.10.003 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.04.01910.1016/j.enggeo.2016.04.019 ↗
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.000244410.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.0002444 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10346‐024‐02282‐010.1007/s10346‐024‐02282‐0 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10595910.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105959 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.probengmech.2023.10351110.1016/j.probengmech.2023.103511 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10577710.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105777 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.catena.2023.10758710.1016/j.catena.2023.107587 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ress.2025.11152210.1016/j.ress.2025.111522 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.10809710.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108097 ↗
36. Nelsen R. B. · 2006
37. 10.1016/j.csda.2012.08.01010.1016/j.csda.2012.08.010 ↗
38. Reliability Analysis of Unsaturated Slope Considering Spatial Variability
39. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10593810.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105938 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.01.00710.1016/j.enggeo.2010.01.007 ↗
41. 10.1007/s00366‐020‐01108‐610.1007/s00366‐020‐01108‐6 ↗
42. Lu N. · 2004
43. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.10471410.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104714 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.10649710.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106497 ↗