journal article·2010-12-25

Large static problem in numerical limit analysis: A decomposition approach

Zied Kammoun, Franck Pastor, Hichem Smaoui, Joseph Pastor

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A general decomposition approach for the static method of limit analysis is proposed. It is based on piecewise linear stress fields, on a partition into finite element sub‐problems and on a specific coordination of the subproblem stress fields through auxiliary interface problems. The final convex optimization problems are solved using nonlinear interior point programming methods. As validated for the compressed bar with Tresca/von Mises materials in plane strain, this method appears rapidly convergent, so that very large problems with millions of constraints and variables can be solved. Then the method is applied to the classical problem of the stability of a Tresca vertical cut: the static bound to the stability factor is improved to 3.7752, a value to be compared with the recent best upper bound 3.7776. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics · Soil, Finite Element Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Limit analysis of plane problems in soil mechanics10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001441 ↗
2. 10.1016/0093-6413(76)90038-010.1016/0093-6413(76)90038-0 ↗
3. Analyse limite: détermination numérique de solutions statiques complètes. Application au talus vertical
4. 10.1016/0020-7403(82)90041-810.1016/0020-7403(82)90041-8 ↗
5. Abdi R · 1991
6. 10.1002/nag.161018070410.1002/nag.1610180704 ↗
7. 10.1007/BF0259198710.1007/BF02591987 ↗
8. 10.1002/nme.51110.1002/nme.511 ↗
9. 10.1002/nme.55110.1002/nme.551 ↗
10. 10.1137/1.978089871882910.1137/1.9780898718829 ↗
11. MOSEK ApSM. release 4 C/O Symbion Science Park Fruebjergvej 3 2002.
12. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2003.12.00210.1016/j.euromechsol.2003.12.002 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2005.06.00310.1016/j.euromechsol.2005.06.003 ↗
14. Vandenbussche C · 2004
15. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.348-349.69310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.348-349.693 ↗
16. 10.1002/nme.156710.1002/nme.1567 ↗
17. 10.1002/nag.56710.1002/nag.567 ↗
18. Pastor F · 2001
19. 10.1002/cnm.77910.1002/cnm.779 ↗
20. Pastor F · 2005
21. PastorF.Résolution par des méthodes de point intérieur de problèmes de programmation convexe posés par l'analyse limite. These de doctorat Facultés universitaires Notre‐Dame de la Paix de Namur 2007.
22. 10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00267-510.1016/S0890-6955(02)00267-5 ↗
23. 10.1002/nme.248310.1002/nme.2483 ↗
24. Salencon J · 1974
25. Salencon J · 1983
26. Hill R · 1950
27. 10.1137/1.978089871800310.1137/1.9780898718003 ↗
28. 10.1007/978-3-540-34469-810.1007/978-3-540-34469-8 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cam.2009.08.07910.1016/j.cam.2009.08.079 ↗
30. Théorie des charges limites: poinconnement d'une plaque par deux poinçons symétriques en déformation plane
31. Frémond M · 1973 · 297
32. Pastor F · 2007 · 8