journal article·2026-06

Stabilized Semi‐Implicit Material Point Method for Hydro‐Mechanical Coupled Large Deformation Soil‐Structure Interaction Analyses

Chunxin Zhang, Yanni Chen, Jidu Yu, Zhongxuan Yang, Richard J. Jardine, Ning Guo

Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT Hydro‐mechanical coupled analysis of geotechnical problems generally poses stability challenges, particularly for soil‐structure interaction problems involving large deformations. This study presents a stabilized semi‐implicit MPM (Material Point Method) treatment based on the incremental fractional step approach to suppress the arbitrary and unphysical pressure oscillations commonly encountered in explicit MPM formulations. The proposed treatment alleviates the restrictive constraints on time increment durations imposed by geomaterial permeability. A frictional contact algorithm incorporating a penalty function is also shown to effectively reduce the formation of spurious gaps and numerical fluctuations over soil‐structure contact areas. The stability of the semi‐implicit MPM treatment is enhanced by introducing artificial compressibility into the pressure Poisson equation, integrating the APIC (Affine Particle‐in‐Cell) scheme for particle‐grid information transfer, as well as adopting the B‐bar approach to mitigate volumetric locking. Additionally, an axisymmetric formulation is developed to enable more efficient modeling of selected classical geotechnical problems. The effectiveness and robustness of the proposed framework are demonstrated against a series of benchmark test cases, including coupled, axisymmetric, dynamic, large deformation and soil‐structure interaction simulations, considering the Modified Cam‐clay constitutive model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions · Numerical methods in engineering · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Soil Pollution Control and Safety Zhejiang University Hangzhou Zhejiang China

Computing Center for Geotechnical Engineering Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering College of Civil Engineering and Architecture Zhejiang University Hangzhou Zhejiang China

Zhejiang Key Laboratory of the Development and Utilization of Underground Space Zhejiang University Hangzhou Zhejiang China

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clearwater Bay Kowloon Hong Kong China

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Imperial College, South Kensington London UK

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.03.00310.1016/j.compgeo.2016.03.003 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10594510.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105945 ↗
3. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000259910.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002599 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.10415310.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104153 ↗
5. 10.1016/0045-7825(94)90112-010.1016/0045-7825(94)90112-0 ↗
6. 10.1002/nme.278910.1002/nme.2789 ↗
7. Smith I. M. · 2014
8. 10.1002/nag.161008010610.1002/nag.1610080106 ↗
9. 10.1016/0045-7825(89)90003-010.1016/0045-7825(89)90003-0 ↗
10. 10.1002/nme.147010.1002/nme.1470 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000227110.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002271 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.04.00210.1016/j.compgeo.2018.04.002 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cma.2022.11472410.1016/j.cma.2022.114724 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.07.00110.1016/j.compgeo.2013.07.001 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.09.00910.1016/j.compgeo.2014.09.009 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.10469710.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104697 ↗
17. 10.1680/geot.14.P.16310.1680/geot.14.P.163 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.05.00610.1016/j.jrmge.2023.05.006 ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000268710.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002687 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cma.2008.12.00610.1016/j.cma.2008.12.006 ↗
21. Gresho P. M. · 1998
22. 10.1002/nag.249910.1002/nag.2499 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.09.00510.1016/j.compfluid.2018.09.005 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cma.2019.11274210.1016/j.cma.2019.112742 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10571810.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105718 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.10411210.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104112 ↗
27. 10.1002/nag.320710.1002/nag.3207 ↗
28. 10.1007/s40571-019-00249-w10.1007/s40571-019-00249-w ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10561410.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105614 ↗
30. 10.1090/S0025-5718-1968-0242392-210.1090/S0025-5718-1968-0242392-2 ↗
31. 10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60750-310.1016/S1001-6058(16)60750-3 ↗
32. Zienkiewicz O. · 2014
33. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10574610.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105746 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cma.2022.11587110.1016/j.cma.2022.115871 ↗
35. 10.1002/nag.379410.1002/nag.3794 ↗
36. 10.1002/nag.375010.1002/nag.3750 ↗
37. 10.1002/nme.479210.1002/nme.4792 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01091-210.1016/S0045-7825(96)01091-2 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cma.2022.11498510.1016/j.cma.2022.114985 ↗
40. 10.1002/nme.734710.1002/nme.7347 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.04.03210.1016/j.jcp.2012.04.032 ↗
42. 10.1016/0021-9991(86)90211-110.1016/0021-9991(86)90211-1 ↗
43. 10.1016/0010-4655(87)90063-410.1016/0010-4655(87)90063-4 ↗
44. 10.1002/nag.226610.1002/nag.2266 ↗
45. The Generalized Interpolation Material Point Method
46. 10.1002/nme.562010.1002/nme.5620 ↗
47. 10.1002/nme.236010.1002/nme.2360 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00338-210.1016/S0045-7825(99)00338-2 ↗
49. 10.1145/276699610.1145/2766996 ↗
50. 10.1006/jcph.2001.672510.1006/jcph.2001.6725 ↗
51. 10.1002/nme.162015091410.1002/nme.1620150914 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.cma.2018.01.01010.1016/j.cma.2018.01.010 ↗
53. 10.1093/qjmam/16.4.40110.1093/qjmam/16.4.401 ↗
54. Roscoe K. H. · 1968 · 535
55. 10.1002/nme.162024050510.1002/nme.1620240505 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10554710.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105547 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.08.00510.1016/j.compgeo.2013.08.005 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.10494310.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104943 ↗