The effects of intermediate principle stress on the mechanical behavior of transversely isotropic rocks: Insights from DEM simulations
Source abstract
Abstract
Summary The discrete element method (DEM) is used to study the response of anisotropic rocks under true triaxial testing. Numerical samples of seven different bedding orientations (β = 0o, 15o, 30o, 45o, 60o, 75o, and 90o) are created. Six series of test simulations (σ3 = 0, 10, 30, 50, 70, and 100 MPa) are conducted on each sample, with five different σ2 values, varied from σ3 to σ1. The effects of anisotropy and intermediate stress on the peak strength, brittle‐ductile transition, and degree of anisotropy are subsequently explained through underlying micromechanics. Results show a “fan‐shaped” variation of the peak strength with σ2, displaying an ascending‐then‐descending trend. An increasing brittleness with σ2 is observed at lower confining pressures for all, but medium anisotropy angles. For higher confining pressures, increasing ductility with σ2 is seen for every anisotropy angle. A U‐shaped variation of peak strength with anisotropy angles is noted that flattens under high intermediate stress. Hence, for numerical models of Posidonia shale under normalized σ2 higher than 0.76, the anisotropy effect is found to be negligible. Micromechanical analyses reveal that the stress asymmetry, suppression of weak plane action as well as the localization and coalescence of microcracks in the intact rock matrix, due to σ2, are the contributors towards the obtained trends. Since existing failure criteria do not weigh in these features in geotechnical assessments, this paper helps future studies by providing a deeper understanding of these effects and a comprehensive data set for the analyses of anisotropic rocks under polyaxial stress conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Landslides and related hazards · Drilling and Well Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong
School of Civil Engineering Shandong University Jinan China
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Ambrose J · 2014
2. 10.1007/s11440-019-00858-y10.1007/s11440-019-00858-y ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2014.01.00910.1016/j.jrmge.2014.01.009 ↗
4. 10.1017/S001675680006110010.1017/S0016756800061100 ↗
5. Pariseau WG.Plasticity theory for anisotropic rocks and soils. In: Proceedings of the 10th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics1968.
6. 10.1177/00219983710050010610.1177/002199837100500106 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.05.00410.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.05.004 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1365-1609(99)00106-910.1016/S1365-1609(99)00106-9 ↗
9. 10.1029/JB076i005p0125510.1029/JB076i005p01255 ↗
10. True triaxial strength and deformability of the siltstone overlying the Chelungpu fault (Chi‐Chi earthquake)
11. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.03.07310.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.03.073 ↗
12. 10.1002/2016JB01297910.1002/2016JB012979 ↗
13. 10.1007/s11440-016-0480-610.1007/s11440-016-0480-6 ↗
14. 10.1016/0148-9062(72)90012-510.1016/0148-9062(72)90012-5 ↗
15. Stress‐deformation and strength characteristics under three different principle stresses
16. Rock strength criteria: the theories and the evidence
17. Shi L · 2012 · 19
18. 10.1002/nag.232910.1002/nag.2329 ↗
19. Itasca · 2010
20. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.09.01110.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.09.011 ↗
21. The smooth‐joint contact model
22. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.03.01210.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.03.012 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00603-014-0654-110.1007/s00603-014-0654-1 ↗
24. 1981
25. 10.1007/s00603-019-01782-z10.1007/s00603-019-01782-z ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.03.01410.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.03.014 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00603-017-1397-610.1007/s00603-017-1397-6 ↗
28. Kwasniewski M · 1990 · 407
29. 10.1002/nag.247610.1002/nag.2476 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.04.00610.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.04.006 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.02.00210.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.02.002 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.tust.2018.11.01210.1016/j.tust.2018.11.012 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmps.2012.10.00510.1016/j.jmps.2012.10.005 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.02.00410.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.02.004 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.12.00410.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.12.004 ↗
36. 10.1016/S1365-1609(97)80029-910.1016/S1365-1609(97)80029-9 ↗
37. 10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00029-110.1016/S1365-1609(02)00029-1 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jsg.2012.07.01010.1016/j.jsg.2012.07.010 ↗
39. 10.1002/nag.23010.1002/nag.230 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.10521910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105219 ↗
41. 10.1029/2001JB00027710.1029/2001JB000277 ↗
42. Friction on Griffith cracks in rocks under pressure
43. 10.1002/nag.250910.1002/nag.2509 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.10.01810.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.10.018 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.05.00310.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.05.003 ↗
46. 10.1007/s00024-009-0479-010.1007/s00024-009-0479-0 ↗
47. 10.1016/S1365-1609(99)00093-310.1016/S1365-1609(99)00093-3 ↗
48. 10.1029/96JB0328110.1029/96JB03281 ↗
49. 10.1051/epjconf/2010062201010.1051/epjconf/20100622010 ↗
50. Strength and modulus response of anisotropic rock