Analysis and Optimisation of Obstacle‐Crossing Performance of Electric Shovel Based on DEM‐MBD Coupling Method
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT To study and enhance the obstacle‐crossing performance of the electric shovel, an obstacle‐crossing model that employs a coupling methodology integrating the discrete element method (DEM) and multi‐body dynamics (MBD) is constructed. Secondly, the influence of grouser height (GH), track velocity (TV), slope inclination (SI) and slope height (SH) on obstacle‐crossing performance is investigated through DEM‐MBD simulation, with the objective of obtaining an obstacle‐crossing surrogate model through the Kriging method and Box‐Behnken experimental design. On this basis, two optimisation solutions for the obstacle‐crossing performance of the electric shovel are proposed based on a genetic algorithm (GA), and the corresponding obstacle‐crossing performances are analysed. The results demonstrate that the coupling effect between SI and SH exerts a considerable influence on the ground pressure coefficient (GPC), power and disturbance potential energy (DPE). When the optimal TV and GH are set at 0.1 m/s and 9.38 mm, the GPC, power and disturbance kinetic energy (DKE) are observed to diminish to varying degrees, thereby indicating that the obstacle‐crossing performance of the electric shovel has been enhanced.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics · Granular flow and fluidized beds · Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Mechanical Engineering Taiyuan University of Technology Taiyuan PR China
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Jilin University Changchun PR China
Taiyuan Heavy Industry Co LTD Taiyuan PR China
College of Chemical Engineering and Technology Taiyuan University of Science and Technology Taiyuan PR China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TMECH.2020.298700410.1109/TMECH.2020.2987004 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11676‐019‐01095‐510.1007/s11676‐019‐01095‐5 ↗
3. B.Chen J.Wu F.Wang D.Yang andWZhang “Motion Planning for Autonomous Climbing Stairs for Flipper Robot ” in2020 IEEE International Conference on Real‐Time Computing and Robotics (RCAR)(2020) 531–538 https://doi.org/10.1109/RCAR49640.2020.9303039.10.1109/RCAR49640.2020.9303039 ↗
4. 10.1007/978-3-030-19648-6_2910.1007/978-3-030-19648-6_29 ↗
5. 10.1080/01691864.2019.166884810.1080/01691864.2019.1668848 ↗
6. 10.1002/rob.2220810.1002/rob.22208 ↗
7. 10.3390/machines1008070710.3390/machines10080707 ↗
8. 10.1177/172988141772078310.1177/1729881417720783 ↗
9. 10.1108/IR‐05‐2013‐35310.1108/IR‐05‐2013‐353 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jterra.2010.05.00610.1016/j.jterra.2010.05.006 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jterra.2010.05.00610.1016/j.jterra.2010.05.006 ↗
12. 10.1177/168781401664788910.1177/1687814016647889 ↗
13. 10.1007/s40430‐016‐0641‐410.1007/s40430‐016‐0641‐4 ↗
14. 10.1016/0022‐4898(81)90015‐X10.1016/0022‐4898(81)90015‐X ↗
15. 10.1016/0022‐4898(81)90001‐X10.1016/0022‐4898(81)90001‐X ↗
16. Lyu W. · 2018
17. 10.1016/j.jterra.2022.11.00410.1016/j.jterra.2022.11.004 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jterra.2023.07.00410.1016/j.jterra.2023.07.004 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.05.08510.1016/j.powtec.2021.05.085 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.apt.2022.10373110.1016/j.apt.2022.103731 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.autcon.2024.10536410.1016/j.autcon.2024.105364 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.07.04810.1016/j.powtec.2021.07.048 ↗
23. E.Tutumluer H.Huang andYHashash “Aggregate Shape Effects on Ballast Tamping and Railroad Track Lateral Stability ” (paper presentation AREMA 2006 Annual Conference Louisville KY 17–20/09 2006) https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:133086694.
24. 10.4271/2010‐01‐037510.4271/2010‐01‐0375 ↗
25. 10.1115/1.402475910.1115/1.4024759 ↗
26. Li X. · 2015
27. 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.02.00310.1016/j.powtec.2018.02.003 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.powtec.2011.10.05710.1016/j.powtec.2011.10.057 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.10.07410.1016/j.powtec.2020.10.074 ↗
30. 10.1108/0264440111111816910.1108/02644401111118169 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.01.06310.1016/j.powtec.2013.01.063 ↗
32. SBroad.Simulating Soft Soils in EDEM With the Soils Starter Pack accessed May 13 2021 https://www.edemsimulation.com/blog‐and‐news/blog/simulating‐soft‐soils‐edem‐soils‐starter‐pack.
33. 10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.4710.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47 ↗
34. 10.1115/1.400997310.1115/1.4009973 ↗
35. On the Contact of Elastic Solids
36. 10.1016/j.ress.2020.10707410.1016/j.ress.2020.107074 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.00210.1016/j.ress.2019.03.002 ↗
38. 10.1007/s00158‐019‐02337‐010.1007/s00158‐019‐02337‐0 ↗
39. 10.1007/s00158‐006‐0025‐y10.1007/s00158‐006‐0025‐y ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matcom.2018.12.01110.1016/j.matcom.2018.12.011 ↗