A Review of Forward-Dynamics Simulation Models for Predicting Optimal Technique in Maximal Effort Sporting Movements
Source abstract
Abstract
The identification of optimum technique for maximal effort sporting tasks is one of the greatest challenges within sports biomechanics. A theoretical approach using forward-dynamics simulation allows individual parameters to be systematically perturbed independently of potentially confounding variables. Each study typically follows a four-stage process of model construction, parameter determination, model evaluation, and model optimization. This review critically evaluates forward-dynamics simulation models of maximal effort sporting movements using a dynamical systems theory framework. Organismic, environmental, and task constraints applied within such models are critically evaluated, and recommendations are made regarding future directions and best practices. The incorporation of self-organizational processes representing movement variability and “intrinsic dynamics” remains limited. In the future, forward-dynamics simulation models predicting individual-specific optimal techniques of sporting movements may be used as indicative rather than prescriptive tools within a coaching framework to aid applied practice and understanding, although researchers and practitioners should continue to consider concerns resulting from dynamical systems theory regarding the complexity of models and particularly regarding self-organization processes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Sports Performance and Training · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Sports injuries and prevention
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Suffolk, Ipswich IP4 1QJ, UK
School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. In search of sports biomechanics’ holy grail: Can athlete-specific optimum sports techniques be identified?10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.07.044 ↗
2. Challenging conventional paradigms in applied sports biomechanics research10.1007/s40279-018-1030-1 ↗
3. The future of performance-related sports biomechanics research10.1080/02640419408732156 ↗
4. Hong, Y., and Bartlett, R.M. (2008). Biomechanical simulation models of sports activities. Handbook of Biomechanics and Human Movement Science, Routledge.10.4324/9780203889688 ↗
5. Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research10.1073/pnas.1711978115 ↗
6. Sport biomechanics: Data collection, modelling, and implementation stages of development
7. Jones, R.L., and Kingston, K. (2013). Biomechanics for coaches. An Introduction to Sports Coaching: Connecting Theory and Practice, Routledge.
8. Maximising somersault rotation in tumbling10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.09.008 ↗
9. Evaluation of a torque-driven model of jumping for height10.1123/jab.22.4.264 ↗
10. Is a single or double arm technique more advantageous in triple jumping?10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.07.030 ↗
11. Determining effective subject-specific strength levels for forward dives using computer simulations of recorded performances10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.08.007 ↗
12. Maximising forward somersault rotation in springboard diving10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.01.033 ↗
13. Optimising the front foot contact phase of the cricket fast bowling action10.1080/02640414.2020.1770407 ↗
14. Optimum take-off techniques for high and long jumps10.1098/rstb.1990.0144 ↗
15. The margin for error when releasing the high bar for dismounts10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00431-1 ↗
16. Kane, T.R., and Levinson, D.A. (1985). Dynamics, Theory and Applications, McGraw Hill.
17. Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A., and Vetterling, W. (1988). Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press.10.1016/S0003-2670(00)82860-3 ↗
18. Coping with perturbations to a layout somersault in tumbling10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00077-0 ↗
19. Optimisation of phase ratio in the triple jump using computer simulation10.1016/j.humov.2015.12.012 ↗
20. The effect of increasing strength and approach velocity on triple jump performance10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.10.009 ↗
21. Trade-offs between horizontal and vertical velocities during triple jumping and the effect on phase distances10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.12.011 ↗
22. Kelso, J.A.S. (1995). Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior, MIT Press.
23. Wade, M., and Whiting, H.T.A. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. Motor Development in Children: Aspects of Coordination and Control, Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-009-4460-2 ↗
24. Camazine, S., Deneubourg, J.L., Franks, N.R., Sneyd, J., Bonabeau, E., and Theraula, G. (2001). Self-Organization in Biological Systems, Princeton University Press.
25. McGarry, T., O′Donoghue, P., and Sampaio, J. (2013). Self-organisation and constraints in sports performance. Routledge Handbook of Sports Performance Analysis, Routledge.10.4324/9780203806913 ↗
26. Davis, W.E., and Broadhead, G.D. (2007). Task constraints and movement organization: A common language. Ecological Task Analysis and Movement, Human Kinetics.10.5040/9781492595434 ↗
27. Towards a Grand Unified Theory of sports performance10.1016/j.humov.2015.08.001 ↗
28. Topological dynamics: A framework for describing movement and its constraints10.1016/0167-9457(82)90017-3 ↗
29. 1 On the concept of coordinative structures as dissipative structures: I. Theoretical lines of convergence10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61936-6 ↗
30. Validation of mathematical models10.1016/0021-9290(79)90148-9 ↗
31. Simple and complex models for studying muscle function in walking10.1098/rstb.2003.1338 ↗
32. A dynamic optimization solution for vertical jumping in three dimensions10.1080/10255849908907988 ↗
33. A comprehensive model for human motion simulation and its application to the take-off phase of the long jump10.1016/0021-9290(81)90019-1 ↗
34. Payton, C.J., and Bartlett, R.M. (2018). Computer simulation modelling in sport. Biomechanical Evaluation of Movement in Sport and Exercise: BASES Guidelines, Routledge.
35. Evaluation of a torque-driven simulation model of tumbling10.1123/jab.18.3.195 ↗
36. The need for muscle co-contraction prior to a landing10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.06.058 ↗
37. The simulation of aerial movement—IV. A computer simulation model10.1016/0021-9290(90)90372-A ↗
38. Full-body musculoskeletal model for muscle-driven simulation of human gait10.1109/TBME.2016.2586891 ↗
39. An EMG-driven model to estimate muscle forces and joint moments in stroke patients10.1016/j.compbiomed.2009.09.002 ↗
40. Rigid musculoskeletal models of the human body ststems: A review10.1142/S0218957716300015 ↗
41. OpenSim: Open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement10.1109/TBME.2007.901024 ↗
42. Simulation of human movement: Applications using OpenSim10.1016/j.piutam.2011.04.019 ↗
43. Regression equations to predict segmental moments of inertia from anthropometric measurements: An extension of the data of Chandler et al. (1975)10.1016/0021-9290(85)90016-8 ↗
44. Chandler, R.F., Clauser, C.E., McConville, J.T., Reynolds, H.M., and Young, J.W. (1975). Investigation of inertial properties of the human body. Natl. Highw. Traffic Saf. Adm., 1–169.
45. Calculating upper limb inertial parameters10.1080/02640419208729926 ↗
46. A mathematical model for the computational determination of parameter values of anthropomorphic segments10.1016/0021-9290(80)90171-2 ↗
47. The simulation of aerial movement—II. A mathematical inertia model of the human body10.1016/0021-9290(90)90370-I ↗
48. Hanavan, E.P. (1964). A mathematical model of the human body. Aerosp. Med. Res. Lab., 1–149.10.1037/e400822004-001 ↗
49. The effects of personalized versus generic scaling of body segment masses on joint torques during stationary wheelchair racing10.1115/1.4043869 ↗
50. Body segment inertial parameters of elite swimmers using DXA and indirect methods
51. Predictive regression modeling of body segment parameters using individual-based anthropometric measurements10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109349 ↗
52. Predicting in vivo soft tissue masses of the lower extremity using segment anthropometric measures and DXA10.1123/jab.21.4.371 ↗
53. A dual x-ray absorptiometry validated geometric model for the calculation of body segment inertial parameters of young females10.1123/jab.2016-0307 ↗
54. A comparison between a new model and current models for estimating trunk segment inertial parameters10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.003 ↗
55. Body segment parameter estimation of the human lower leg using an elliptical model with validation from DEXA10.1007/s10439-006-9088-6 ↗
56. Using mass distribution information to model the human thigh for body segment parameter estimation10.1115/1.1894367 ↗
57. Analysis of body segment parameter differences between four human populations and the estimation errors of four popular mathematical models10.1115/1.1590359 ↗
58. The mechanics of the backward giant circle on the high bar10.1016/S0167-9457(00)00008-7 ↗
59. Analysis of the kinematic and dynamic behavior of the shoulder mechanism10.1016/0021-9290(94)90064-7 ↗
60. Models incorporating pin joints are suitable for simulating performance but unsuitable for simulating internal loading10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.02.019 ↗
61. Minimum distraction gap: How much ankle joint space is enough in ankle distraction arthroplasty?10.1007/s11420-013-9359-3 ↗
62. Impact-absorbing properties of the human knee10.1302/0301-620X.69B5.3680348 ↗
63. A comparative study of impact dynamics: Wobbling mass model versus rigid body models10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00033-5 ↗
64. The influence of soft tissue movement on ground reaction forces, joint torques and joint reaction forces in drop landings10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.10.036 ↗
65. Anthropometric prediction of component tissue masses in the minor limb segments of the human body
66. Determination of subject-specific model parameters for visco-elastic elements10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.012 ↗
67. Gross tissue weights in the human body by cadaver dissection
68. Lower extremity joint loading during impact in running10.1016/0268-0033(96)00008-3 ↗
69. The role of the heel pad and shank soft tissue during impacts: A further resolution of a paradox10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00199-8 ↗
70. Changes in inertial parameters of the lower limb during the impact phase of dynamic tasks10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109488 ↗
71. A model for the estimation of visceral mass displacement in periodic movements10.1016/0021-9290(94)90036-1 ↗
72. Intensity analysis in time-frequency space of surface myoelectric signals by wavelets of specified resolution10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00030-4 ↗
73. Modification of soft tissue vibrations in the leg by muscular activity10.1152/jappl.2001.90.2.412 ↗
74. Soft tissue motion during impacts: Their potential contributions to energy dissipation10.1123/jab.18.3.231 ↗
75. The dynamics of muscular contraction
76. Muscle structure and theories of contraction10.1016/S0096-4174(18)30128-8 ↗
77. A simulation study of vertical jumping from different starting postures10.1016/0021-9290(96)00030-9 ↗
78. Komi, P.V. (1992). Contractile performance of skeletal muscle fibres. Strength and Power in Sport. Vol. III of the Encyclopaedia of Sports Medicine, Blackwell Scientific.
79. Comparing different approaches for determining joint torque parameters from isovelocity dynamometer measurements10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.11.024 ↗
80. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007909 ↗
81. The sarcomere length-tension relation determined in short segments of intact muscle fibres of the frog10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016516 ↗
82. The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle
83. Muscular force at different speeds of shortening10.1113/jphysiol.1935.sp003318 ↗
84. Modelling the maximum voluntary joint torque/angular velocity relationship in human movement10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.12.012 ↗
85. Effect of voluntary vs. artificial activation on the relationship of muscle torque to speed10.1152/jappl.1990.69.6.2215 ↗
86. Effects of electrical stimulation on eccentric and concentric torque-velocity relationships during knee extension in man10.1111/j.1748-1716.1990.tb08971.x ↗
87. Muscle activation during maximal voluntary eccentric and concentric knee extension10.1007/BF00626764 ↗
88. Muscle activation differences between eccentric and concentric isokinetic exercise10.1097/00005768-199811000-00010 ↗
89. Activation of human quadriceps femoris during isometric, concentric, and eccentric contractions10.1152/jappl.2001.91.6.2628 ↗
90. The torque–velocity relationship in large human muscles: Maximum voluntary versus electrically stimulated behaviour10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.11.052 ↗
91. The relation between force and speed in muscular contraction10.1113/jphysiol.1939.sp003756 ↗
92. Cross-bridge cycling theories cannot explain high-speed lengthening behavior in frog muscle10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82523-6 ↗
93. Dependence of human squat jump performance on the series elastic compliance of the triceps surae: A simulation study10.1242/jeb.204.3.533 ↗
94. Winter, D.A. (1990). Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, Wiley.
95. The influence of the biarticularity of the gastrocnemius muscle on vertical-jumping achievement10.1016/0021-9290(93)90608-H ↗
96. Contribution of muscle series elasticity to maximum performance in drop jumping10.1123/jab.22.1.3 ↗
97. In vivo measurement of the series elasticity release curve of human triceps surae muscle10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00062-1 ↗
98. The mechanical properties of human muscle10.1249/00003677-198500130-00014 ↗
99. Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.09.005 ↗
100. An EMG-driven musculoskeletal model to estimate muscle forces and knee joint moments in vivo10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00010-1 ↗