The nanogranular origin of friction and cohesion in shale—A strength homogenization approach to interpretation of nanoindentation results
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract An inverse micromechanics approach allows interpretation of nanoindentation results to deliver cohesive‐frictional strength behavior of the porous clay binder phase in shale. A recently developed strength homogenization model, using the Linear Comparison Composite approach, considers porous clay as a granular material with a cohesive‐frictional solid phase. This strength homogenization model is employed in a Limit Analysis Solver to study indentation hardness responses and develop scaling relationships for indentation hardness with clay packing density. Using an inverse approach for nanoindentation on a variety of shale materials gives estimates of packing density distributions within each shale and demonstrates that there exists shale‐independent scaling relations of the cohesion and of the friction coefficient that vary with clay packing density. It is observed that the friction coefficient, which may be interpreted as a degree of pressure‐sensitivity in strength, tends to zero as clay packing density increases to one. In contrast, cohesion reaches its highest value as clay packing density increases to one. The physical origins of these phenomena are discussed, and related to fractal packing of these nanogranular materials. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1190/1.144491710.1190/1.1444917 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11440-007-0038-810.1007/s11440-007-0038-8 ↗
3. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4428-8_5810.1007/978-1-4612-4428-8_58 ↗
4. 10.1007/3-211-38046-9_710.1007/3-211-38046-9_7 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2007.09.00610.1016/j.mechmat.2007.09.006 ↗
6. JizbaD.Mechanical and acoustical properties of sandstones and shales. Ph.D. Dissertation Stanford University Palo Alto 1991.
7. 10.1016/S0148-9062(98)00162-410.1016/S0148-9062(98)00162-4 ↗
8. AbousleimanY TranM HoangS BobkoC OrtegaA UlmF‐J.Geomechanics field and lab characterization of Woodford Shale: the next gas play. 2007 Annual SPE Technical Conference and Exhibition Anaheim CA 11–14 November 2007; SPE 110120.10.2118/110120-MS ↗
9. 10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00048-510.1016/S1365-1609(02)00048-5 ↗
10. Schofield AN · 1968
11. Wood DM · 1990
12. 10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00148-310.1016/S0020-7683(03)00148-3 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.680210.1103/PhysRevE.61.6802 ↗
14. 10.1115/1.344340110.1115/1.3443401 ↗
15. 10.1007/978-3-7091-2662-2_210.1007/978-3-7091-2662-2_2 ↗
16. Determination of the macroscopic strength criterion of a porous medium by nonlinear homogenization
17. 10.1016/j.crme.2005.09.00810.1016/j.crme.2005.09.008 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2005.06.00310.1016/j.euromechsol.2005.06.003 ↗
19. 10.1002/047003200610.1002/0470032006 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10853-007-1859-410.1007/s10853-007-1859-4 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmps.2007.06.01110.1016/j.jmps.2007.06.011 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.crme.2009.06.03010.1016/j.crme.2009.06.030 ↗
23. 10.1346/CCMN.1988.036020110.1346/CCMN.1988.0360201 ↗
24. Mitchell J · 2005
25. 10.1346/CCMN.2006.054061010.1346/CCMN.2006.0540610 ↗
26. Mavko G · 1998
27. 10.1190/1.309788710.1190/1.3097887 ↗
28. Homogenization of cohesive‐frictional strength properties of porous composites: linear comparison composite approach
29. A nonlinear optimization procedure for limit analysis
30. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19971115)40:21<4011::AID-NME242>3.0.CO;2-Q10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19971115)40:21<4011::AID-NME242>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
31. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02012.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02012.x ↗
32. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:8(808)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:8(808) ↗
34. 10.1002/nag.85010.1002/nag.850 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.06.01910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.06.019 ↗
36. 10.1016/0022-5096(92)90050-C10.1016/0022-5096(92)90050-C ↗
37. 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00099-010.1016/S0022-5096(01)00099-0 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jmps.2006.06.00310.1016/j.jmps.2006.06.003 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.272710.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2727 ↗
40. 10.1080/12795119.2002.969240610.1080/12795119.2002.9692406 ↗
41. BrinellJA.Memoire sur les epreuves a bille en acier. Congres International des Methodes d'Essai des Materiaux de Construction Paris vol. 2 1901;83–94.
42. 10.1016/0020-7403(92)90016-A10.1016/0020-7403(92)90016-A ↗
43. 10.1016/0022-5096(63)90035-810.1016/0022-5096(63)90035-8 ↗
44. 10.1098/rspa.1948.000810.1098/rspa.1948.0008 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.03.03510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.03.035 ↗
46. 2004
47. 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00370-710.1016/S0008-8846(00)00370-7 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.03510.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.035 ↗
49. 10.3208/sandf1972.17.2_2910.3208/sandf1972.17.2_29 ↗
50. InglesOG.Bonding forces in soils—part 3. Proceedings of the First Conference of the Australian Road Research Board vol. 1 1962;1025–1047.
51. 10.1021/jp036362l10.1021/jp036362l ↗
52. 10.1038/3509501810.1038/35095018 ↗
53. 10.1126/science.284.5420.165010.1126/science.284.5420.1650 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.129510.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1295 ↗
55. 10.1038/nature0275010.1038/nature02750 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.06430310.1103/PhysRevLett.89.064303 ↗
57. 10.1016/0266-352X(94)90003-510.1016/0266-352X(94)90003-5 ↗
58. Bowden FP · 200110.1093/oso/9780198507772.001.0001 ↗
59. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.322310.1103/PhysRevLett.65.3223 ↗
60. 10.1142/S0218348X9400073910.1142/S0218348X94000739 ↗
61. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.132510.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1325 ↗
62. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.04430110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.044301 ↗
63. 10.1190/1.344778710.1190/1.3447787 ↗