journal article·2020-10-05Open access

Damage Diagnosis for Offshore Wind Turbine Foundations Based on the Fractal Dimension

Ervin Hoxha, Yolanda Vidal, Francesc Pozo

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 19

Abstract

Cost-competitiveness of offshore wind depends heavily in its capacity to switch preventive maintenance to condition-based maintenance. That is, to monitor the actual condition of the wind turbine (WT) to decide when and which maintenance needs to be done. In particular, structural health monitoring (SHM) to monitor the foundation (support structure) condition is of utmost importance in offshore-fixed wind turbines. In this work a SHM strategy is presented to monitor online and during service a WT offshore jacket-type foundation. Standard SHM techniques, as guided waves with a known input excitation, cannot be used in a straightforward way in this particular application where unknown external perturbations as wind and waves are always present. To face this challenge, a vibration-response-only SHM strategy is proposed via machine learning methods. In this sense, the fractal dimension is proposed as a suitable feature to identify and classify different types of damage. The proposed proof-of-concept technique is validated in an experimental laboratory down-scaled jacket WT foundation undergoing different types of damage.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Campus Diagonal-Besòs (CDB), Control, Modeling, Identification and Applications (CoDAlab), Department of Mathematics, Escola d’Enginyeria de Barcelona Est (EEBE), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Eduard Maristany, 16, 08019 Barcelona, Spain

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) - Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (MINECO), and the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional 346 (FEDER) · Generalitat de Catalunya

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Na, W.S., and Baek, J. (2018). A review of the piezoelectric electromechanical impedance based structural health monitoring technique for engineering structures. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18051307 ↗
2. Chen, H.P. (2018). Structural Health Monitoring of Large Civil Engineering Structures, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119166641 ↗
3. Development of a long-range multi-area scanning ultrasonic propagation imaging system built into a hangar and its application on an actual aircraft10.1177/1475921716664493 ↗
4. Challenges in testing and monitoring the in-operation vibration characteristics of wind turbines10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.07.023 ↗
5. Outlook, I.O.W. (2019). World Energy Outlook Series, International Energy Agency.
6. Martinez-Luengo, M., and Shafiee, M. (2019). Guidelines and Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Structural Health Monitoring Implementation in Offshore Wind Turbine Support Structures. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12061176 ↗
7. Radar-based structural health monitoring of wind turbine blades: The case of damage localization10.1002/we.2184 ↗
8. Hybrid bolt-loosening detection in wind turbine tower structures by vibration and impedance responses10.12989/was.2017.24.4.385 ↗
9. An application of Structural Health Monitoring system based on FBG sensors to offshore wind turbine support structure model10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.10.006 ↗
10. Structural health monitoring of an offshore wind turbine tower using iFEM methodology10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107291 ↗
11. Baseline model based structural health monitoring method under varying environment10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.007 ↗
12. Structural health monitoring of towers and blades for floating offshore wind turbines using operational modal analysis and modal properties with numerical-sensor signals10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106226 ↗
13. Fatigue crack detection for lifetime extension of monopile-based offshore wind turbines10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.341 ↗
14. Structural health monitoring of offshore wind turbines: A review through the Statistical Pattern Recognition Paradigm10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.085 ↗
15. Foundation structural health monitoring of an offshore wind turbine—A full-scale case study10.1177/1475921715586624 ↗
16. Structural condition assessment of offshore wind turbine monopile foundations using vibration monitoring data. Nondestructive Characterization for Composite Materials, Aerospace Engineering, Civil Infrastructure, and Homeland Security 2013
17. Zugasti Uriguen, E. (2014). Design and Validation of a Methodology for Wind Energy Structures Health Monitoring. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya].
18. Vibration-response-only statistical time series structural health monitoring methods: A comprehensive assessment via a scale jacket structure10.1177/1475921719862487 ↗
19. Vidal, Y., Aquino, G., Pozo, F., and Gutiérrez-Arias, J.E.M. (2020). Structural Health Monitoring for Jacket-Type Offshore Wind Turbines: Experimental Proof of Concept. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20071835 ↗
20. Puruncajas, B., Vidal, Y., and Tutivén, C. (2020). Vibration-Response-Only Structural Health Monitoring for Offshore Wind Turbine Jacket Foundations via Convolutional Neural Networks. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20123429 ↗
21. Wind turbine fault detection and classification by means of image texture analysis10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.12.035 ↗
22. Characterization of medical time series using fuzzy similarity-based fractal dimensions10.1016/S0933-3657(02)00114-8 ↗
23. El-Kishky, A. (2012, January 2–5). Assessing entropy and fractal dimensions as discriminants of seizures in EEG time series. Proceedings of the 2012 11th International Conference on Information Science, Signal Processing and their Applications (ISSPA), Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ISSPA.2012.6310687 ↗
24. Detection of glaucomatous eye via color fundus images using fractal dimensions
25. Sensitivity analysis of fractal dimensions of crack maps on concrete and masonry walls10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103258 ↗
26. Rolling element bearing fault diagnosis based on multiscale general fractal features
27. Vidal, Y., Pozo, F., and Tutivén, C. (2018). Wind turbine multi-fault detection and classification based on SCADA data. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11113018 ↗
28. Pozo, F., Vidal, Y., and Serrahima, J.M. (2016). On real-time fault detection in wind turbines: Sensor selection algorithm and detection time reduction analysis. Energies, 9.10.3390/en9070520 ↗
29. Mandelbrot, B.B. (1983). The Fractal Geometry of Nature, WH freeman.10.1119/1.13295 ↗
30. Sevcik, C. (2010). A procedure to estimate the fractal dimension of waveforms. arXiv.
31. A note on fractal dimensions of biomedical waveforms10.1016/j.compbiomed.2009.08.001 ↗
32. Approach to an irregular time series on the basis of the fractal theory10.1016/0167-2789(88)90081-4 ↗
33. Fractal dimension measurement of engineering surfaces10.1016/S0890-6955(97)00103-X ↗
34. Fractal dimensions for rainfall time series10.1016/S0378-4754(99)00023-3 ↗
35. Bourke, P. (1991). An Introduction to Fractals, The University of Western of Australia.
36. Addison, P.S. (1997). Fractals and Chaos: An Illustrated Course, CRC Press.10.1201/9780849384431 ↗
37. Fractals and the analysis of waveforms10.1016/0010-4825(88)90041-8 ↗
38. Analysis of distance measures using k-nearest neighbor algorithm on kdd dataset
39. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. (2013). An Introduction to Statistical Learning, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7 ↗
40. A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002 ↗
41. Krüger, F. (2016). Activity, Context, and Plan Recognition with Computational Causal Behaviour Models. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Rostock].
42. Hameed, N., Hameed, F., Shabut, A., Khan, S., Cirstea, S., and Hossain, A. (2019). An Intelligent Computer-Aided Scheme for Classifying Multiple Skin Lesions. Computers, 8.10.3390/computers8030062 ↗
43. Shateri, M., Sobhanigavgani, Z., Alinasab, A., Varamesh, A., Hemmati-Sarapardeh, A., Mosavi, A., and Shamshirband, S.S. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Nanofluids Viscosity Assessment. Nanomaterials, 10.10.3390/nano10091767 ↗
44. Wu, Z., Wang, X., and Jiang, B. (2020). Fault Diagnosis for Wind Turbines Based on ReliefF and eXtreme Gradient Boosting. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10093258 ↗