journal article·2026-02

Non‐Intrusive Global‐Local Method for Poroelasticity Problems With Localized Pressure Effects

Hemanta Kunwar, Sanghyun Lee, Son‐Young Yi

Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT In many poroelasticity applications, pressure effects are confined to a small region, making it inefficient and possibly unnecessary to solve the full system across the entire domain. Instead, we propose to solve the poroelasticity problem locally, where pressure effects are significant, and use a simpler linear elasticity model elsewhere. This creates a coupled elasticity–poroelasticity problem with transmission conditions. To solve this coupled problem, we propose a new non‐intrusive global–local algorithm that iteratively solves the elasticity problem in the entire (global) domain and the poroelasticity problem only in a local domain, ensuring proper transmission conditions across the interface. This approach, which extends the existing global–local concept applied to single‐physics problems to multiphysics systems, significantly reduces computational cost, especially when the local domain is much smaller than the global one. Numerical experiments demonstrate the robustness and efficiency of the method, showcasing its potential for providing an efficient solution for more complex multi‐physics problems with localized effects of a single physical process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics · Numerical methods in engineering · Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mathematical Sciences The University of Texas at El Paso El Paso Texas USA

Department of Mathematics Florida State University Tallahassee Florida USA

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy · National Science Foundation

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1142/S021820251100503910.1142/S0218202511005039 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11440-009-0091-610.1007/s11440-009-0091-6 ↗
3. 10.1093/gji/ggx31010.1093/gji/ggx310 ↗
4. 10.1080/10255842.2011.62866010.1080/10255842.2011.628660 ↗
5. 10.1080/17515831.2017.137885210.1080/17515831.2017.1378852 ↗
6. 10.1137/19M126834310.1137/19M1268343 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.camwa.2023.12.03810.1016/j.camwa.2023.12.038 ↗
8. 10.1016/0045-7949(91)90334-I10.1016/0045-7949(91)90334-I ↗
9. 10.1002/cnm.164009090510.1002/cnm.1640090905 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00466-009-0372-910.1007/s00466-009-0372-9 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11831-014-9132-x10.1007/s11831-014-9132-x ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cma.2014.04.01210.1016/j.cma.2014.04.012 ↗
13. 10.1002/nag.215510.1002/nag.2155 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.camwa.2020.07.01310.1016/j.camwa.2020.07.013 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cma.2019.11274410.1016/j.cma.2019.112744 ↗
16. 10.1515/jnum-2012-001310.1515/jnum-2012-0013 ↗
17. 10.1515/jnma-2024-013710.1515/jnma-2024-0137 ↗
18. T. A.Settari “Workflow for Coupled Geomechanical and Reservoir Problems—Recent Experiences ” inProceedings of the 74th EAGE Conference and Exhibition – Workshops(European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers 2012) cp–295.10.3997/2214-4609.20149816 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cma.2010.12.02210.1016/j.cma.2010.12.022 ↗
20. 10.1002/nag.240010.1002/nag.2400 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10596-013-9393-810.1007/s10596-013-9393-8 ↗