Foot-Mounted Inertial Measurement Units-Based Device for Ankle Rehabilitation
Source abstract
Abstract
Ankle sprains are frequent injuries that occur among people of all ages. Ankle sprains constitute approximately 15% of all sports injuries, and are the most common traumatic emergencies. Without proper treatment and rehabilitation, a more severe sprain can weaken the ankle, making it more likely for new injures, and leading to long-term problems. In this work, we present an inertial measurement units (IMU)-based physical interface for measuring the foot attitude, and a graphical user interface that acts as a visual guide for patient rehabilitation. A foot-mounted physical interface for ankle rehabilitation was developed. The physical interface is connected to the computer by a Bluetooth link, and provides feedback to the patient while performing dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, eversion, and inversion exercises. The system allows for in-home rehabilitation at an affordable price while engaging the patient through active therapy. According to the results, more consistent rehabilitation could be achieved by providing feedback on foot angular position during therapy procedures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Foot and Ankle Surgery · Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Tecnologico de Monterrey, Campus Querétaro, Ave. Epigmenio González 500, Fracc. San Pablo, Querétaro, QRO 76130, Mexico
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Major Trends in the Development of Ankle Rehabilitation Devices
2. Phases of Rehabilitation10.1016/j.fcl.2013.02.011 ↗
3. Robust Iterative Feedback Tuning Control of a Compliant Rehabilitation Robot for Repetitive Ankle Training10.1109/TMECH.2016.2618771 ↗
4. Passive Rehabilitation Exercises with an Ankle Rehabilitation Prototype Based in a Robot Parallel Structure10.1109/TLA.2017.7827887 ↗
5. Sandoval-Palomares, J.J., Yáñez-Mendiola, J., Gómez-Espinosa, A., and López-Vela, J.M. (2016). Portable System for Monitoring the Microclimate in the Footwear-Foot Interface. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16071059 ↗
6. Real-Time Human Foot Motion Localization Algorithm with Dynamic Speed10.1109/THMS.2016.2586741 ↗
7. Stance-Phase Detection for ZUPT-Aided Foot-Mounted Pedestrian Navigation System10.1109/TMECH.2015.2430357 ↗
8. Context-Aided Inertial Navigation via Belief Condensation10.1109/TSP.2016.2515065 ↗
9. Ren, M., Pan, K., Liu, Y., Guo, H., Zhang, X., and Wang, P. (2016). A Novel Pedestrian Navigation Algorithm for a Foot-Mounted Inertial-Sensor-Based System. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16010139 ↗
10. Bao, S.-D., Meng, X.-L., Xiao, W., and Zhang, Z.-Q. (2017). Fusion of Inertial/Magnetic Sensor Measurements and Map Information for Pedestrian Tracking. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17020340 ↗
11. Shi, W., Wang, Y., and Wu, Y. (2017). Dual MIMU Pedestrian Navigation by Inequality Constraint Kalman Filtering. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17020427 ↗
12. Pham, D.D., and Suh, Y.S. (2016). Pedestrian Navigation Using Foot-Mounted Inertial Sensor and LIDAR. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16010120 ↗
13. Ilyas, M., Cho, K., Baeg, S.-H., and Park, S. (2016). Drift Reduction in Pedestrian Navigation System by Exploiting Motion Constraints and Magnetic Field. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16091455 ↗
14. Fusca, M., Negrini, F., Perego, P., Magoni, L., Molteni, F., and Andreoni, G. (2018). Validation of a Wearable IMU System for Gait Analysis: Protocol and Application to a New System. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8071167 ↗
15. Inertial Sensor-Based Smoother for Gait Analysis10.3390/s141224338 ↗
16. Tunca, C., Pehlivan, N., Ak, N., Arnrich, B., Salur, G., and Ersoy, C. (2017). Inertial Sensor-Based Robust Gait Analysis in Non-Hospital Settings for Neurological Disorders. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17040825 ↗
17. Taborri, J., Palermo, E., Rossi, S., and Cappa, P. (2016). Gait Partitioning Methods: A Systematic Review. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16010066 ↗
18. Chirakanphaisarn, N. (2014, January 6–8). Measurement and Analysis System of the Knee Joint Motion in Gait Evaluation for Rehabilitation Medicine. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and It’s Applications (DICTAP), Bangkok, Thailand.10.1109/DICTAP.2014.6821703 ↗
19. Moufawad el Achkar, C., Lenoble-Hoskovec, C., Paraschiv-Ionescu, A., Major, K., Büla, C., and Aminian, K. (2016). Physical Behavior in Older Persons during Daily Life: Insights from Instrumented Shoes. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16081225 ↗
20. Ladha, C., O’Sullivan, J., Belshaw, Z., and Asher, L. (2017). GaitKeeper: A System for Measuring Canine Gait. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17020309 ↗
21. Foot Pose Estimation Using an Inertial Sensor Unit and Two Distance Sensors10.3390/s150715888 ↗
22. Benoussaad, M., Sijobert, B., Mombaur, K., and Azevedo Coste, C. (2016). Robust Foot Clearance Estimation Based on the Integration of Foot-Mounted IMU Acceleration Data. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16010012 ↗
23. Zhou, Q., Zhang, H., Lari, Z., Liu, Z., and El-Sheimy, N. (2016). Design and Implementation of Foot-Mounted Inertial Sensor Based Wearable Electronic Device for Game Play Application. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16101752 ↗
24. Mitschke, C., Heß, T., and Milani, T.L. (2017). Which Method Detects Foot Strike in Rearfoot and Forefoot Runners Accurately when Using an Inertial Measurement Unit?. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7090959 ↗
25. An optimization-based approach to human body motion capture using inertial sensors10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.02252 ↗
26. Eliminating the Effect of Magnetic Disturbances on the Inclination Estimates of Inertial Sensors
27. The adaptive drop foot stimulator—Multivariable learning control of foot pitch and roll motion in paretic gait10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.06.009 ↗
28. Rehabilitation exercise assessment using inertial sensors: A cross-sectional analytical study10.1186/1743-0003-11-158 ↗
29. A Skill Acquisition Based Framework for Aiding Lower Limb Injury Rehabilitation using a Single Inertial Sensor with Concurrent Visual Feedback10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.260 ↗
30. Long, Y., Du, Z.-J., Wang, W.-D., Zhao, G.-Y., Xu, G.-Q., He, L., Mao, X.-W., and Dong, W. (2016). PSO-SVM-Based Online Locomotion Mode Identification for Rehabilitation Robotic Exoskeletons. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16091408 ↗
31. Zhang, H., Hernandez, D.E., Su, Z., and Su, B. (2018). A Low Cost Vision-Based Road-Following System for Mobile Robots. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8091635 ↗
32. Borraz, R., Navarro, P.J., Fernández, C., and Alcover, P.M. (2018). Cloud Incubator Car: A Reliable Platform for Autonomous Driving. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8020303 ↗
33. Elangovan, K., Krishnasamy Tamilselvam, Y., Mohan, R.E., Iwase, M., Takuma, N., and Wood, K.L. (2017). Fault Diagnosis of a Reconfigurable Crawling–Rolling Robot Based on Support Vector Machines. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7101025 ↗
34. IMU-Based Joint Angle Measurement for Gait Analysis10.3390/s140406891 ↗
35. Realtime Assessment of Foot Orientation by Accelerometers and Gyroscopes10.1515/cdbme-2015-0112 ↗
36. (2018, July 14). “InvenSense Inc”. MPU-6000 and MPU-6050 Product Specification Rev. 3.4. Available online: https://store.invensense.com/datasheets/invensense/MPU-6050_DataSheet_V3%204.pdf.
37. (2018, July 14). “I2Cdevlib”. MPU-6050 6-Axis Accelerometer/Gyroscope, I2Cdevlib Device Source and Documentation. Available online: http://www.i2cdevlib.com/devices/mpu6050.
38. Kalman-Filter-Based Orientation Determination Using Inertial/Magnetic Sensors: Observability Analysis and Performance Evaluation10.3390/s111009182 ↗
39. (2018, July 14). “MPU-6050 Accelerometer + Gyro”. Example Sketch (Base Code). Available online: https://playground.arduino.cc/Main/MPU-6050.
40. (2018, July 14). “42Bots”. Arduino Script for MPU-6050 Auto-Calibration. Available online: https://42bots.com/tutorials/arduino-script-for-mpu-6050-auto-calibration/.