Three‐dimensional finite element analysis of lined tunnels
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper describes finite element procedures that have been developed to model the ground movements that occur when a shallow tunnel is installed in a clay soil. This study is part of a wider project concerned with the development of new methods to predict the likely extent of damage to surface structures caused by nearby shallow tunnelling. This particular paper, however, is concerned only with the numerical model of tunnel installation. The structural liner is an important component of this tunnel installation model; two different ways of modelling the liner (based on continuum elements and shell elements) are discussed in the paper. A test problem consisting of the installation of a lined tunnel in an elastic continuum is used to investigate the merits of these different approaches. When continuum elements are used to model the liner, the numerical results agree well with an analytical solution to the problem. When shell elements are used to model the liner, however, the results were found to be significantly influenced by the particular formulation adopted for the shell elements. Example analyses, involving incremental tunnel construction in a clay soil where the soil is modelled using a kinematic hardening plasticity model, are described. These analyses confirm that a thin layer of continuum elements may be used, satisfactorily, to model tunnel linings in a soil–structure interaction analysis of this sort. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Railway Engineering and Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Mair RJ · 1996 · 713
2. AugardeCE.Numerical modelling of tunnelling processes for assessment of damage to buildings. D. Phil. Thesis University of Oxford 1997.
3. LiuG.Numerical modelling of settlement damage to masonry buildings caused by tunnelling. D.Phil. Thesis University of Oxford 1997.
4. Modelling tunnel‐induced settlement of masonry buildings10.1680/geng.2000.143.1.17 ↗
5. Gunn M · 1993 · 304
6. Addenbrooke T · 1996 · 441
7. 10.1680/igeng.1997.2923310.1680/igeng.1997.29233 ↗
8. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199911)23:13<1393::AID-NAG933>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199911)23:13<1393::AID-NAG933>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
9. HoulsbyGT.A model for the variable stiffness of undrained clay. Proceedings of International Symposium on Pre‐Failure Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials Torino vol. 1.1999;443–450.
10. Cook RD · 1989
11. Filling space with tetrahedra10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990410)44:10<1383::AID-NME616>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
12. Numerical conditioning in structural solutions: a proposal for a new condition number10.1016/0965-9978(94)90009-4 ↗
13. 10.1002/cnm.164009040510.1002/cnm.1640090405 ↗
14. 10.1016/0045-7949(90)90071-910.1016/0045-7949(90)90071-9 ↗
15. 10.1002/nme.162035050310.1002/nme.1620350503 ↗
16. 10.1007/978-1-4471-1669-110.1007/978-1-4471-1669-1 ↗
17. 10.1016/0045-7949(84)90197-410.1016/0045-7949(84)90197-4 ↗
18. A triangular membrane element with rotational degrees of freedom10.1016/0045-7825(85)90113-6 ↗
19. 10.1016/0045-7949(94)00438-910.1016/0045-7949(94)00438-9 ↗
20. Astley RJ · 1992
21. Hibbitt Karlsson and Sorensen Inc. Abaqus Theory Manual Version 5.8 1998.
22. Zienkiewicz OC · 1983
23. 10.1016/0266-352X(85)90024-210.1016/0266-352X(85)90024-2 ↗
24. AugardeCE BurdHJ HoulsbyGT.A three‐dimensional finite element model of tunnelling. Proceedings of NUMOG V Davos Switzerland 6–8 September 1995;457–462.
25. Simplified methods for tunnel design
26. Bakker KJ · 1996 · 459
27. Interaction of tunnel linings and soft ground10.1016/0886-7798(92)90111-T ↗
28. 10.1139/t83-00210.1139/t83-002 ↗
29. Stallebrass SE · 1996 · 595
30. Simpson B · 1996 · 591