journal article·2022-03

Influence of foundation flexibility on the topology optimization of piled structures

Iago Cavalcante, Emanuel Tavares, Renato Picelli, Josué Labaki

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This article investigates the influence of foundation and soil flexibility on the topology optimization of piled structures. The structure is modeled with classical finite elements, while the embedded pile group foundation and its interaction with the soil are modeled via the stiffness matrix method. Coupling between the structure and its foundation is obtained by establishing direct continuity and equilibrium conditions at their interface. Topology optimization of the discretized piled structure is performed through the Bi‐directional Evolutionary Structural Optimization (BESO) method for various boundary conditions. The objective function of the optimization problem is the minimization of the compliance of the piled structure under prescribed volume restriction. The results show that the flexibility of the soil and piles may have a significant effect on the optimal topology of the structure, as well as on the achievable optimization objective.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Topology Optimization in Engineering · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering University of Campinas Campinas Brazil

Polytechnic School University of São Paulo São Paulo Brazil

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-210.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2 ↗
2. Milestones in the 150‐year history of topology optimization: A review
3. 10.1007/s00158-009-0440-y10.1007/s00158-009-0440-y ↗
4. 10.1115/1.404117610.1115/1.4041176 ↗
5. Revisiting density‐based topology optimization for fluid‐structure‐interaction problems
6. 10.1007/BF0165094910.1007/BF01650949 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0045-7825(02)00559-510.1016/S0045-7825(02)00559-5 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00158-013-0997-310.1007/s00158-013-0997-3 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.finel.2007.06.00610.1016/j.finel.2007.06.006 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.finel.2017.10.00610.1016/j.finel.2017.10.006 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2004.12.00110.1016/j.compgeo.2004.12.001 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.02.00310.1016/j.compgeo.2014.02.003 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.11.03710.1016/j.engstruct.2012.11.037 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.000048810.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000488 ↗
15. Sobótka M · 2020 · 612
16. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.06.01210.1016/j.compgeo.2016.06.012 ↗
17. 10.1016/0267-7261(91)90053-310.1016/0267-7261(91)90053-3 ↗
18. Piessens R · 2012
19. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2021.01.01010.1016/j.enganabound.2021.01.010 ↗
20. Bathe KJ · 2006
21. Curtin WG · 1994