DEA-Based PROMETHEE II Distribution-Center Productivity Model: Evaluation and Location Strategies Formulation
Source abstract
Abstract
The current era of industrial economics necessitates warehouse and logistic distribution centers (DCs) to contribute productively toward an organization’s success. Playing such a critical productive role implies that logistics activities must be practiced effectively and efficiently. However, the indistinguishability between effectiveness and efficiency leads to a somewhat shallow interpretation, and consequently, a diluted evaluation. Hence, this paper aims to develop a productivity evaluation model for nine DCs belonging to an international automotive vehicles and spare parts company. The developed model was set up based on two multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches: the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations II (PROMETHEE II) and data envelopment analysis (DEA). PROMETHEE II was employed to evaluate the effectiveness, while the DEA was utilized in order to measure the efficiency of the investigated DCs. The resulting hybrid model collectively creates what can conceptually and practically be considered a productivity evaluation model. The results also provide six different strategies through which distribution center locations can be evaluated in order to implement potential future initiatives.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Efficiency Analysis Using DEA · Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
Funding
Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR.) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Sumanth, D.J. (1984). Productivity Engineering and Management: Productivity Measurement, Evaluation, Planning, and Improvement in Manufacturing and Service Organizations, McGraw-Hill College.
2. Group heterogeneity in multi member decision making model with an application to warehouse location selection in a supply chain10.1016/j.cie.2016.12.025 ↗
3. A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS-F). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location10.3846/transport.2010.52 ↗
4. Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methodologies and implementation of a warehouse location selection problem10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.022 ↗
5. A novel hybrid MCDM model based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy VIKOR for city logistics concept selection10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.021 ↗
6. The selection of dry port location by a hybrid CFA-MACBETH-PROMETHEE method: A case study of Southern Thailand10.1016/j.ajsl.2017.09.004 ↗
7. Vidovic, M., Kilibarda, M., Zecevic, S., Miljus, M., and Radivojevic, G. (2015, January 21–23). The selection of the logistics center location using AHP method. Proceedings of the 2nd Logistics International Conference, Belgrade, Serbia.
8. Application of Fuzzy Delphi TOPSIS to locate logistics centers in Vietnam: The logisticians’ perspective10.1016/j.ajsl.2017.12.004 ↗
9. A multicriteria decision-making approach used for the selection of a logistics center location
10. Logistics freight center locations decision by using Fuzzy-PROMETHEE10.3846/16484142.2014.983966 ↗
11. Logistics centre concept through evolution and definition
12. Rushton, A., Croucher, P., and Baker, P. (2014). The Handbook of Logistics and Distribution Management: Understanding the Supply Chain, Kogan Page Publishers.
13. Warehouse operator selection by combining AHP and DEA methodologies10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.12.046 ↗
14. Selection of logistics centre location via ELECTRE method: A case study in Turkey
15. Evaluating potential freight villages in Istanbul using multi criteria decision making techniques
16. The selection of the logistics center location based on MCDM/A methodology10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.034 ↗
17. Evaluation of freight villages: A GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis10.1016/j.compind.2015.12.003 ↗
18. AHP ve VIKOR Bütünleşik yaklaşımıyla Lojistik Merkez Yer Seçimi: Kayseri ili örneği
19. Ghoseiri, K., and Lessan, J. (2008, January 3–5). Location selection for logistic centres using a two-step fuzzy AHP and ELECTE method. Proceedings of the 9th Asia Pasific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference, Bali, Indonesia.
20. Selection of logistics center location using Axiomatic Fuzzy Set and TOPSIS methodology in logistics management10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.161 ↗
21. A selection model to logistic centers based on TOPSIS and MCGP methods: The case of airline industry10.1155/2014/470128 ↗
22. A fuzzy approach to select the location of the distribution center10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00459-X ↗
23. Developing and solving a new model for the location problems: Fuzzy-goal programming approach10.3923/jas.2009.1344.1349 ↗
24. A multi-criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty10.1016/j.mcm.2010.07.023 ↗
25. Evaluating distribution centers via a maximizing set and minimizing set based Fuzzy MCDM approach
26. Li, S., and Wei, Z. (2018). A hybrid approach based on the analytic hierarchy process and 2-tuple hybrid ordered weighted averaging for location selection of distribution centers. PLoS ONE, 13.10.1371/journal.pone.0206966 ↗
27. Distribution center location selection using a novel multi criteria decision-making approach under interval neutrosophic complex sets10.5267/j.dsl.2020.2.001 ↗
28. Waters, C.D.J. (2019). Logistics: An Introduction to Supply Chain Management, Red Globe Press.
29. An integrated benchmarking approach to distribution center performance using DEA modeling10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00087-0 ↗
30. Freight village design using the multicriteria method PROMETHEE
31. Evaluating efficiency and effectiveness of logistics infrastructure based on PCA-DEA approach in China10.1109/ICICTA.2009.483 ↗
32. Vijay, M.A., and Shankar, C. (2010, January 9–10). Facility Location Selection using PROMETHEE II Method. Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
33. Alp, Ö.N., Demirtaş, N., Baraçli, H., and Tuzkaya, U.R. (2011, January 12–18). Fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE methodology to select bus garage location: A case study for a firm in the urban passenger transport sector in Istanbul. Proceedings of the 15th International Research/Expert Conference, Prague, Czech Republic.
34. Use of Promethee method to determine the best alternative for warehouse storage location assignment10.1007/s00170-013-5405-z ↗
35. A framework for measuring transport efficiency in distribution centers10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.09.013 ↗
36. Visual management of performance with PROMETHEE productivity analysis10.1007/s00500-017-2884-0 ↗
37. Measuring performance of government-supported drug warehouses using DEA to improve quality of drug distribution10.1108/JAMR-12-2019-0227 ↗
38. A novel hybrid fuzzy PROMETHEE-IDEA approach to efficiency evaluation10.1007/s00500-020-05416-3 ↗
39. Brans, J.P. (, 1982). L’ingenierie de la decision, l’laboration d’instruments d’aidea la decision. Proceedings of the Colloque sur l’Aidea la Decision, Faculte des Sciences de l’Administration, Universite Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
40. A preference ranking organization method. The PROMETHEE method for MCDM
41. A multicriteria classification approach based on pairwise comparisons10.1016/j.ejor.2003.06.011 ↗
42. PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021 ↗
43. Alidrisi, H., Aydin, M.E., Bafail, A.O., Abdulal, R., and Karuvatt, S.A. (2019). Monitoring the performance of petrochemical organizations in Saudi Arabia using data envelopment analysis. Mathematics, 7.10.3390/math7060519 ↗
44. A multi-criteria decision-making approach that combines fuzzy topsis and DEA methodologies
45. Saputri, V.H.L., Sutopo, W., Hisjam, M., and Ma’aram, A. (2019). Sustainable agri-food supply chain performance measurement model for GMO and Non-GMO using data envelopment analysis method. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9061199 ↗
46. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8 ↗
47. Taylan, O., Alamoudi, R., Kabli, M., AlJifri, A., Ramzi, F., and Herrera-Viedma, E. (2020). Assessment of energy systems using extended fuzzy AHP, fuzzy VIKOR, and TOPSIS approaches to manage non-cooperative opinions. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12072745 ↗
48. Resource allocation for strategic quality management: A goal programming approach10.1108/02656711211216135 ↗
49. Alidrisi, H. (2021). Measuring the environmental maturity of the supply chain finance: A big data-based multi-criteria perspective. Logistics, 5.10.3390/logistics5020022 ↗