journal article·2025-08Open access

Revisiting Undrained Cavity Expansion in Mohr–Coulomb Soils: Consideration of Limited Dilation

He Yang, Xu Wang, Shengli Chen, Pei‐Zhi Zhuang, Hai‐Sui Yu

Abstract

ABSTRACT The effective stresses are found to continually increase for undrained cavity expansion in Mohr–Coulomb soils with unlimited dilation. This paper revisits this problem and presents a new solution with further consideration of limited soil dilation. The soil is modelled as a non‐associated Mohr–Coulomb model, and the limited dilation is controlled by the limited plastic volumetric strain, beyond which the soil dilation angle drops to zero. Both the auxiliary variable approach and total strain approach are leveraged for solution derivation, as the former helps to give more concise solutions while the latter is more efficient in calculating the stresses and deformation at a given time. A series of parametric studies is conducted based on the new solution, with highlighting on the influence of limited soil dilation. When dilation ceases for soils with limited dilation, it is found that the effective stresses remain steady instantly rather than keep increasing, and the excess water pressure and total inner cavity pressure gradually increase to steady states. The limit cavity pressure will be heavily overestimated if the limited soil dilation is neglected.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Soil and Unsaturated Flow · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Qilu Transportation Shandong University Jinan China

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Louisiana State University Baton, Rouge Louisiana USA

School of Civil Engineering University of Leeds Leeds UK

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-94-015-9596-410.1007/978-94-015-9596-4 ↗
2. In‐Situ Measurement of Soil Properties With Pressuremeter
3. 10.1680/geot.1977.27.4.45510.1680/geot.1977.27.4.455 ↗
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:12(2118)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:12(2118) ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.10501710.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105017 ↗
6. Cavity Expansion‐Based Interpretation of Piezocone Penetration Test (CPTu) Data in Clays
7. 10.1680/geot.1994.44.3.42710.1680/geot.1994.44.3.427 ↗
8. 10.1680/jgele.18.0008310.1680/jgele.18.00083 ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000267310.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002673 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11440‐023‐02074‐110.1007/s11440‐023‐02074‐1 ↗
11. Mair R. J. · 1993 · 449
12. 10.1680/geot.2008.58.9.69510.1680/geot.2008.58.9.695 ↗
13. 10.1002/(Sici)1096‐9853(199910)23:12<1245::Aid‐Nag30>3.3.Co;2‐N10.1002/(Sici)1096‐9853(199910)23:12<1245::Aid‐Nag30>3.3.Co;2‐N ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tust.2021.10427710.1016/j.tust.2021.104277 ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.000081610.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000816 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11440‐023‐02189‐510.1007/s11440‐023‐02189‐5 ↗
17. 10.1093/qjmam/12.1.5210.1093/qjmam/12.1.52 ↗
18. 10.1016/0020-7403(89)90027-110.1016/0020-7403(89)90027-1 ↗
19. 10.1680/geot.1991.41.2.17310.1680/geot.1991.41.2.173 ↗
20. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199607)20:7<489::AID-NAG829>3.0.CO;2-V10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199607)20:7<489::AID-NAG829>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
21. 10.1002/nag.252910.1002/nag.2529 ↗
22. 10.1002/nag.89210.1002/nag.892 ↗
23. Hill R. · 1950
24. 10.1002/nag.161016010310.1002/nag.1610160103 ↗
25. 10.1680/geot.11.P.08810.1680/geot.11.P.088 ↗
26. 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2002)2:2(233)10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2002)2:2(233) ↗
27. 10.1680/jgeot.21.0014110.1680/jgeot.21.00141 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.10416210.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104162 ↗
29. 10.1680/geot.11.P.02710.1680/geot.11.P.027 ↗
30. 10.1139/cgj-2019-081510.1139/cgj-2019-0815 ↗
31. A Graphical Analysis‐Based Method for Undrained Cylindrical Cavity Expansion in Modified Cam Clay Soil
32. 10.1680/jgele.23.0008010.1680/jgele.23.00080 ↗
33. 10.1680/geot.1994.44.1.2110.1680/geot.1994.44.1.21 ↗
34. 10.1007/s00466-005-0672-710.1007/s00466-005-0672-7 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.10411410.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104114 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.10399010.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103990 ↗
37. 10.1139/cgj‐2021‐046510.1139/cgj‐2021‐0465 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10551610.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105516 ↗
39. 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG‐1241710.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG‐12417 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.10.01810.1016/j.jrmge.2023.10.018 ↗
41. 10.1002/nag.345510.1002/nag.3455 ↗
42. 10.1002/nag.331110.1002/nag.3311 ↗
43. Abbo A. J. · 1997
44. 10.1680/geot.1986.36.3.34910.1680/geot.1986.36.3.349 ↗
45. A Graphical Method for Undrained Analysis of Cavity Expansion in Mohr–Coulomb Soil
46. 10.1061/JENMDT.EMENG-743310.1061/JENMDT.EMENG-7433 ↗
47. 10.1002/nag.376010.1002/nag.3760 ↗
48. Schofield A. N. · 1968 · 310
49. 10.1016/0020‐7683(76)90020‐210.1016/0020‐7683(76)90020‐2 ↗
50. 10.1080/19648189.2020.185730910.1080/19648189.2020.1857309 ↗