Monitoring the Dynamic Response of a Buried Polyethylene Pipe to a Blast Wave: An Experimental Study
Source abstract
Abstract
Although the use of polyethylene (PE) pipelines has become increasingly widespread in recent years, few studies have addressed their seismic design and ability to withstand blast waves. In order to establish their seismic capacity, the dynamic response of buried pipelines subjected to blast waves must be explored in depth. Here, we studied the dynamic response of PE pipes situated near an explosive source. Time histories of dynamic strains were measured by conventional strain gauges after simple waterproof treatment, and pipe and ground vibration velocity curves were obtained. Based on the experimental data, the attenuation law of the peak strains under the conditions of different charge masses and blast center distances was analyzed, and the spectrum characteristics of strain, velocity of the pipe, and ground velocity were studied. The results revealed that a large hoop strain on the PE pipes was produced due to the local impact near the explosive source. We found that peak hoop strain (PHS) or peak axial strain (PAS) had a power attenuation relationship with the scaled distance, and this relationship could also be derived by dimensional analysis. The average frequency of strains had the same attenuation form as the charge mass, which was between 10 Hz and 50 Hz. Additionally, the vibration of the pipe showed a low frequency. We also determined that the attenuation of the average frequency of pipe and ground vibration velocity was closely related to the charge mass and the scaled distance. Pipe peak vibration velocity (PPVV), ground peak particle velocity (GPPV), and the peak dynamic strain of pipe were highly positively correlated, which verifies the feasibility of using GPPV to characterize pipeline vibration and strain level. Thus, a blasting criterion of 10% minimum request strength (MRS) for PE pipe was proposed, which means that the additional PHS or PAS of the dangerous point must be less than 10% MRS, and we also propose limiting the safety distance–charge mass for blasts near buried PE pipelines by the criterion. Some results in this paper can serve as the basis for future in-depth theoretical research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Seismic Waves and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Science Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430065, Hubei, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. A novel embeddable spherical smart aggregate for structural health monitoring: Part I. Fabrication and electrical characterization10.1088/1361-665X/aa80bc ↗
2. A novel embeddable spherical smart aggregate for structural health monitoring: Part II. Numerical and experimental verifications10.1088/1361-665X/aa80ef ↗
3. Song, G., Wang, C., and Wang, B. (2017). Structural health monitoring (SHM) of civil structures. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7080789 ↗
4. Tomonori, N., Spencer, B.F., Agha, G.A., and Mechitov, K.A. (June, January 31). Model-based data aggregation for structural monitoring employing smart sensors. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems 2006, Chicago, IL, USA.
5. Balageas, D., Fritzen, C.P., and Güemes, A. (2006). Structural Health Monitoring, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470612071 ↗
6. Yan, S., Ma, H., Li, P., Song, G., and Wu, J. (2017). Development and Application of a Structural Health Monitoring System Based on Wireless Smart Aggregates. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17071641 ↗
7. A study of concrete slab damage detection based on the electromechanical impedance method10.3390/s141019897 ↗
8. Xu, J., Hao, J., Li, H., Luo, M., Guo, W., and Li, W. (2017). Experimental Damage Identification of a Model Reticulated Shell. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7040362 ↗
9. Kong, Q., Robert, R.H., Silva, P., and Mo, Y.L. (2016). Cyclic crack monitoring of a reinforced concrete column under simulated pseudo-dynamic loading using piezoceramic-based smart aggregates. Appl. Sci., 6.10.3390/app6110341 ↗
10. A multi-delay-and-sum imaging algorithm for damage detection using piezoceramic transducers10.1177/1045389X16666184 ↗
11. Luo, M., Li, W., Hei, C., and Song, G. (2016). Concrete Infill Monitoring in Concrete-Filled FRP Tubes Using a PZT-Based Ultrasonic Time-of-Flight Method. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16122083 ↗
12. Smart wireless sensor technology for structural health monitoring of civil structures
13. Impedance based bolt pre-load monitoring using piezoceramic smart washer10.1088/1361-665X/aa6a8e ↗
14. A Time Reversal Based Pipeline Leakage Localization Method with the Adjustable Resolution10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2829984 ↗
15. Gas pipeline leakage detection based on PZT sensors10.1088/1361-665X/26/2/025022 ↗
16. Active monitoring of pipeline tapered thread connection based on time reversal using piezoceramic transducers10.12989/sss.2016.18.4.643 ↗
17. On the effects of reflections on time delay estimation for leak detection in buried plastic water pipes10.1016/j.jsv.2009.03.037 ↗
18. Detecting leaks in plastic pipes10.1002/j.1551-8833.2000.tb08819.x ↗
19. Leak detection in water-filled plastic pipes through the application of tuned wavelet transforms to Acoustic Emission signals10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.02.006 ↗
20. Xu, K., Deng, Q., Cai, L., Ho, S., and Song, G. (2018). Damage Detection of a Concrete Column Subject to Blast Loads Using Embedded Piezoceramic Transducers. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18051377 ↗
21. Qi, B., Kong, Q., Qian, H., Patil, D., Lim, I., Li, L.M., Liu, D., and Song, G. (2018). Study of impact damage in PVA-ECC beam under low-velocity impact loading using piezoceramic transducers and PVDF thin-film transducers. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18020671 ↗
22. Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Improvised Explosive Device Attacks That Cause Significant Building Damage10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000694 ↗
23. Method for Rapid Impact Localization for Subsea Structures10.1109/JSEN.2018.2815267 ↗
24. Štoller, J., and Zezulová, E. (June, January 31). Use of ultrasound-The ultrasonic pulse velocity method for the diagnosis of protective structures after the load of TNT explosion. Proceedings of the ICMT, 2017 International Conference, Brno, Czech Republic.10.1109/MILTECHS.2017.7988761 ↗
25. Experimental investigation of blasting vibration safety criterion on buried pipeline
26. Risk analysis of blasting operations around in-service oil and gas pipelines
27. Siskind, D.E., Stagg, M.S., Wiegand, J.E., and Schulz, D.L. (1994). Surface Mine Blasting near Pressurized Transmission Pipelines.
28. Esparza, E.D., Westine, P.S., and Wenzel, A.B. (1981). Pipeline Response to Buried Explosive Detonations, American Gas Association.
29. Analytical solution of the dynamic response of buried pipelines under blast wave10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.07.014 ↗
30. Dowding, C.H. (1985). Blast Vibration Monitoring and Control, Prentice-Hall.
31. Analytical calculation of blast-induced strains to buried pipelines10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.08.008 ↗
32. Liu, Q. (1992). Blasting Engineer’s Manual, China Coal Industry Publishing House.
33. Seismic waveforms from explosive sources located in boreholes and initiated in different directions10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.09.004 ↗
34. Theoretical Analysis on Decay Mechanism and Law of Blasting Vibration Frequency
35. Seismic response of buried pipelines: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00113-2 ↗
36. Wave propagation modeling of the PZT sensing region for structural health monitoring10.1088/0964-1726/16/3/018 ↗
37. Lu, G., Feng, Q., Li, Y., Wang, H., and Song, G. (2017). Characterization of Ultrasound Energy Diffusion Due to Small-Size Damage on an Aluminum Plate Using Piezoceramic Transducers. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17122796 ↗
38. A Novel Fractal Contact-Electromechanical Impedance Model for Quantitative Monitoring of Bolted Joint Looseness10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2855693 ↗
39. Modeling and analysis of Lamb wave propagation in a beam under lead zirconate titanate actuation and sensing10.1177/1045389X14536010 ↗
40. Structural health monitoring of multi-spot welded joints using a lead zirconate titanate based active sensing approach10.1088/0964-1726/25/1/015031 ↗
41. Adaptive antenna shape control using piezoelectric actuators10.1016/S0094-5765(97)00185-9 ↗
42. A piezoelectric active sensing method for quantitative monitoring of bolt loosening using energy dissipation caused by tangential damping based on the fractal contact theory10.1088/1361-665X/aa9a65 ↗
43. Huo, L., Li, C., Jiang, T., and Li, H.N. (2018). Feasibility Study of Steel Bar Corrosion Monitoring Using a Piezoceramic Transducer Enabled Time Reversal Method. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8112304 ↗
44. Detecting Damage Size and Shape in a Plate Structure Using PZT Transducer Array10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000904 ↗
45. Huo, L., Wang, B., Chen, D., and Song, G. (2017). Monitoring of Pre-Load on Rock Bolt Using Piezoceramic-Transducer Enabled Time Reversal Method. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17112467 ↗
46. Embedded piezoelectric lead-zirconate-titanate-based dynamic internal normal stress sensor for concrete under impact10.1177/1045389X17698238 ↗
47. Du, G., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., and Song, G. (2017). Experimental Study on Stress Monitoring of Sand-Filled Steel Tube during Impact Using Piezoceramic Smart Aggregates. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17081930 ↗
48. An overheight vehicle–bridge collision monitoring system using piezoelectric transducers10.1088/0964-1726/16/2/026 ↗
49. An experimental feasibility study of pipeline corrosion pit detection using a piezoceramic time reversal mirror10.1088/0964-1726/25/3/037002 ↗
50. Crack detection and leakage monitoring on reinforced concrete pipe10.1088/0964-1726/24/11/115020 ↗
51. Feasibility Study on Crack Detection of Pipelines Using Piezoceramic Transducers10.1155/2013/631715 ↗