Application of unconstrained optimization and sensitivity analysis to calibration of a soil constitutive model
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Large sets of soil experimental data (field and laboratory) are becoming increasingly available for calibration of soil constitutive models. A challenging task is to calibrate a potentially large number of model parameters to satisfactorily match many data sets simultaneously. This calibration effort can be facilitated by optimization techniques. The current study aims to explore systematic approaches for exercising optimization and sensitivity analysis in the area of soil constitutive modelling. Analytical, semi‐analytical and numerical optimization techniques are employed to calibrate a multi‐surface‐plasticity sand model. Calibration is based on results from a number of drained triaxial sample tests and a dynamic centrifuge liquefaction test. The analytical and semi‐analytical approaches and associated sensitivity analysis are applied to calibrate the model non‐linear shear stress–strain response. Thereafter, model parameters controlling shear–volume coupling effects (dilatancy) are calibrated using a solid–fluid fully coupled finite element program in conjunction with an advanced numerical optimization code. A related sensitivity study reveals the challenges often encountered in optimizing highly non‐linear functions. Overall, this study demonstrates applicability and limitations of optimization techniques for constitutive model calibration. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. DeNataleJS.On the calibration of constitutive models by multivariate optimization. Ph.D. Dissertation University of California Davis 1983.
2. AbifadelN KlisinskiM StureS KoHY.Unconstrained optimization for the calibration of an elasto‐plastic constitutive model. Report Department of Civil Environmental and Architectural Engineering University of Colorado Boulder: U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Contract DACA 39‐83‐C‐0012 1988;65.
3. ZeghalM Abdel‐GhaffarAM.Identification of the behavior of earth dams using seismic records. Report No. CRECE 9001 Center for Research in Earthquake Engineering and Construction University of Southern California September1989.
4. 10.1002/nag.161015120210.1002/nag.1610151202 ↗
5. Modelling of the behavior of dry sand by an elasto‐plastic ‘Fuzzy Set’ model10.1016/0266-352X(91)90021-7 ↗
6. 10.1002/nag.13710.1002/nag.137 ↗
7. 10.1002/nag.30210.1002/nag.302 ↗
8. 10.1093/comjnl/3.3.17510.1093/comjnl/3.3.175 ↗
9. 10.1093/comjnl/7.2.15510.1093/comjnl/7.2.155 ↗
10. Fletcher R · 1980
11. Fletcher R · 1981
12. Gill PE · 1981
13. Dennis JE · 1983
14. ZeghalM.System identification of the nonlinear seismic response of earth dams. Ph.D. Thesis Princeton University NJ 1990.
15. 10.3208/sandf.36.2_11110.3208/sandf.36.2_111 ↗
16. ZeghalM Abdel‐GhaffarA‐M.Evaluation of the nonlinear seismic response of earth dams: I. Pattern recognition.2003; in review.
17. ZeghalM Abdel‐GhaffarA‐M.Evaluation of the nonlinear seismic response of earth dams: II. System identification.2003; in review.
18. 10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00022-210.1016/S0267-7261(02)00022-2 ↗
19. A computational model for cyclic mobility and associated shear deformation10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:12(1119) ↗
20. ArulmoliK MuraleetharanKK HossainMM FruthLS.VELACS: verification of liquefaction analyses by centrifuge studies. Laboratory Testing Program Soil Data Report The Earth Technology Corporation Project No. 90‐0562 Irvine CA 1992.
21. DobryR TaboadaVM.Possible Lessons from VELACS Model No. 2 Results. Proceedings the International Conference on the Verification of Numerical Procedures for the Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Problems Arulanandan K Scott RF (eds) vol. 2. Balkema Rotterdam 1994;1341–1352.
22. Bard Y · 1974
23. 10.1016/0261-7277(85)90030-010.1016/0261-7277(85)90030-0 ↗
24. ParraE.Numerical modeling of liquefaction and lateral ground deformation including cyclic mobility and dilation response in soil systems. Ph.D. Thesis Department of Civil Engineering Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy NY 1996.
25. YangZ.Numerical modeling of earthquake site response including dilation and liquefaction. Ph.D. Dissertation Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics Columbia University New York NY 2000.
26. Hill R · 1950
27. Hyperbolic stress–strain response: cohesive soils10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000479 ↗
28. Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001458 ↗
29. Chen WF · 1990
30. 10.3208/sandf1972.15.2910.3208/sandf1972.15.29 ↗
31. SeedHB IdrissIM.Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses. Report EERC 70‐10 Earthquake Engineering Research Center University of California Berkeley 1970.
32. TaboadaVM.Centrifuge modeling of earthquake‐induced lateral spreading in sand using a laminar box. Ph.D. Thesis Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy NY 1995.
33. Influence of permeability on liquefaction‐induced shear deformation10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:7(720) ↗
34. GillPE MurrayW SaundersM.SNOPT: An SOP algorithm for large‐scale constrained optimization. Report NA 97‐2 Department of Mathematics University of California San Diego Report SOL 97‐3 Department of EESOR Stanford University 1997.