Part Qualification Methodology for Composite Aircraft Components Using Acoustic Emission Monitoring
Source abstract
Abstract
The research presented in this article aims to demonstrate how acoustic emission (AE) monitoring can be implemented in an industrial setting to assist with part qualification, as mandated by related industry standards. The combined structural and nondestructive evaluation method presented departs from the traditional pass/fail criteria used for part qualification, and contributes toward a multi-dimensional assessment by taking advantage of AE data recorded during structural testing. To demonstrate the application of this method, 16 composite fixed-wing-aircraft spars were tested using a structural loading sequence designed around a manufacturer-specified design limit load (DLL). Increasing mechanical loads, expressed as a function of DLL were applied in a load-unload-reload pattern so that AE activity trends could be evaluated. In particular, the widely used Felicity ratio (FR) was calculated in conjunction with specific AE data post-processing, which allowed for spar test classification in terms of apparent damage behavior. To support such analysis and to identify damage critical regions in the spars, AE activity location analysis was also employed. Furthermore, recorded AE data were used to perform statistical analysis to demonstrate how AE datasets collected during part qualification could augment testing conclusions by providing additional information as compared to traditional strength testing frequently employed e.g., in the aerospace industry. In this context, AE data post-processing is presented in conjunction with ultimate strength information, and it is generally shown that the incorporation of AE monitoring is justified in such critical part qualification testing procedures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Theoretical & Applied Mechanics Group, Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Department, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
General Atomics-Aeronautical Systems Inc., 9779 Yucca Rd., Adelanto, CA 92301, USA
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. U.S. Naval Air Systems Command (1987). Airplane Strength and Rigidity: Ground Tests, MIL-A-8867C(AS).
2. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (2018). Subchapter C—AIRCRAFT, U.S. Code of Federal Regulation.
3. SAE International (2012). Polymer Matrix Composites: Materials, Usage, Design, and Analysis. Composite Materials Handbook, SAE International. Volume 3 Revision G R-424.
4. SAE International (2012). Polymer Matrix Composites: Guidelines for Characterization of Structural Materials. Composite Materials Handbook, SAE International. Volume 1 Revision G R-422.
5. U.S. Fire Administration (2007). Airframe Guide for Certification of Part 23 Airplanes.
6. U.S. Fire Administration (2011). Damage Tolerance and Fatigue Evaluation of Structure.
7. U.S. Fire Administration (2014). Proof of Structure.
8. U.S. Fire Administration (2010). Quality System for the Manufacture of Composite Structures.
9. U.S. Fire Administration (2003). Acceptance Guidance on Material Procurement and Process Specifications for Polymer Matrix Composite Systems.
10. Acceptance Testing Of Graphite/Epoxy Composite Parts Using An Acoustic Emission Monitoring Technique10.1016/0308-9126(82)90067-0 ↗
11. Oster, R. (2012, January 16–20). Non-Destructive Testing Methodologies on Helicopter Fiber Composite Components Challenges Today and in the Future. Proceedings of the 18th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing, Durban, South Africa.
12. Swindell, P., Doyle, J., and Roach, D. (2016, January 17–22). Integration Of Structural Health Monitoring Solutions Onto Commercial Aircraft via The Federal Aviation Administration Structural Health Monitoring Research Program. Proceedings of the AIP Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1063/1.4974616 ↗
13. Shull, P.J. (2016). Nondestructive Evaluation: Theory, Techniques, and Applications, CRC Press.
14. Pollock, A.A. (1970). Acoustic Emission from Solids Undergoing Deformation. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of London].
15. Acoustic Emission in Materials Research—A Review
16. Moore, P.O. (2005). Fundamentals of Acoustic Emission Testing. Nondestructive Testing Handbook, American Society for Nondestructive Testing. [3rd ed.]. Volume 6 Acoustic Emission Testing.
17. Mo, C., Wisner, B., Cabal, M., Hazeli, K., Ramesh, K., El Kadiri, H., Al-Samman, T., Molodov, K.D., Molodov, D.A., and Kontsos, A. (2016). Acoustic emission of deformation twinning in magnesium. Materials, 9.10.3390/ma9080662 ↗
18. In situ microscopic investigation to validate acoustic emission monitoring10.1007/s11340-015-0074-5 ↗
19. In situ monitoring of particle fracture in aluminium alloys10.1111/ffe.12720 ↗
20. Investigation of particle fracture during fatigue of aluminum 202410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.02.001 ↗
21. Investigation of the Z-binder role in progressive damage of 3D woven composites10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.11.022 ↗
22. Damage quantification in polymer composites using a hybrid NDT approach10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.04.013 ↗
23. An integrated structural health monitoring approach for crack growth monitoring10.1177/1045389X12447987 ↗
24. Novel optico-acoustic nondestructive testing for wire break detection in cables
25. Multi-sensing NDT for damage assessment of concrete masonry walls10.1002/stc.1680 ↗
26. Health monitoring of prestressing tendons in posttensioned concrete bridges10.3141/2220-03 ↗
27. A data fusion approach for progressive damage quantification in reinforced concrete masonry walls10.1088/0964-1726/23/1/015007 ↗
28. Data-Driven Damage Model Based on Nondestructive Evaluation
29. Acoustic emission source modeling using a data-driven approach10.1016/j.jsv.2014.12.021 ↗
30. Fatigue Damage Assessment Leveraging Nondestructive Evaluation Data10.1007/s11837-018-2882-4 ↗
31. Wisner, B., Mazur, K., Perumal, V., Baxevanakis, K., An, L., Feng, G., and Kontsos, A. (2018). Acoustic emission signal processing framework to identify fracture in aluminum alloys. Eng. Fract. Mech., in press.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.04.027 ↗
32. Probabilistic prognosis of fatigue crack growth using acoustic emission data
33. Application of acoustic emission for structure diagnosis
34. On-site acoustic-emission monitoring for assessment of a prestressed concrete double-tee-beam bridge without plans10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000810 ↗
35. Laboratory and field studies on the use of acoustic emission for masonry bridges10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.01.006 ↗
36. Diagnostics of reinforced concrete bridges by acoustic emission
37. Stress-wave-emission monitoring of a military bridge10.1016/0029-1021(72)90063-1 ↗
38. Blanch, M., and Dutton, A. (2003). Acoustic emission monitoring of field tests of an operating wind turbine. Key Engineering Materials, Trans Tech Publ.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.245-246.475 ↗
39. Damage assessment of wind turbine blade under static loading test using acoustic emission10.1177/1045389X13508329 ↗
40. Paquette, J., Van Dam, J., and Hughes, S. (2007, January 8–11). Structural testing of 9m carbon fiber wind turbine research blades. Proceedings of the 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA.10.2514/6.2007-816 ↗
41. Sutherland, H., Beattie, A., Hansche, B., Musial, W., Allread, J., Johnson, J., and Summers, M. (1994). The Application of Non-Destructive Techniques to the Testing of a Wind Turbine Blade, Sandia National Labs.10.2172/10184661 ↗
42. Moore, P.O. (2005). Aerospace Applications of Acoustic Emission Testing. Nondestructive Testing Handbook, American Society for Nondestructive Testing. [3rd ed.]. Volume 6 Acoustic Emission Testing.
43. Acoustic emission for monitoring aircraft structures10.1243/09544100JAERO404 ↗
44. An active–passive acoustics approach for bond-line condition monitoring in aerospace skin stiffener panels10.1016/j.ast.2015.03.007 ↗
45. Prosser, W.H., Gorman, M.R., and Madaras, E.I. (2004). Acoustic Emission Detection of Impact Damage on Space Shuttle Structures, NASA.
46. Health monitoring of aerospace composite structures—Active and passive approach10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.034 ↗
47. On the applicability of acoustic emission to identify modes of damage in full-scale composite fuselage structures10.1177/0021998315576379 ↗
48. Weis, M., Cejpek, J., and Juračka, J. (2016). Acoustic Emission Localization in Testing of Composite Structures. Applied Mechanics and Materials, Trans Tech Publ.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.821.405 ↗
49. Distributed acoustic emission sensing for large complex air structures10.1177/1475921717714614 ↗
50. Cawley, P. (2018). Structural health monitoring: Closing the gap between research and industrial deployment. Struct. Health Monit.10.1177/1475921717750047 ↗
51. Identification of damage mechanisms in fiber-reinforced polymer-matrix composites with Acoustic Emission and the challenge of assessing structural integrity and service-life10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.084 ↗
52. Moore, P.O. (2005). Acoustic Emission Signal Processing. Nondestructive Testing Handbook, American Society for Nondestructive Testing. [3rd ed.]. Volume 6 Acoustic Emission Testing.
53. The Kaiser-effect and its scientific background
54. Waller, J., Andrade, E., and Saulsberry, R. (2009, January 26–31). Use of acoustic emission to monitor progressive damage accumulation in Kevlar® 49 composites. Proceedings of the AIP Conference, Kingston, RI, USA.10.1063/1.3362168 ↗
55. Acoustic emission of fiber reinforced plastics10.1061/JTCAD9.0000042 ↗
56. Advanced structural health monitoring of concrete structures with the aid of acoustic emission10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.103 ↗
57. Research and applications of AE on advanced composites
58. Health monitoring of carbon/carbon, woven reinforced composites. Damage assessment by using advanced signal processing techniques. Part I: Acoustic emission monitoring and damage mechanisms evolution10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.07.020 ↗
59. An experimental investigation of the mechanical behavior and damage of thick laminated carbon/epoxy composite10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.069 ↗
60. Acoustic emission monitoring of small wind turbine blades10.1115/1.1509769 ↗
61. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown10.1080/01621459.1967.10482916 ↗