New Insights from Multibody Dynamic Analyses of a Turnout System under Impact Loads
Source abstract
Abstract
A railway turnout is an essential infrastructure for managing railway traffic flexibility. In contrast, it imposes restrictions on train operations such as lower operational speeds through the turnout due to the complex movements of trains over the turnout. This results in the large-amplitude dynamic responses of the train-turnout interaction. Previous studies have focused on the train-turnout interactions entailing the wheel-rail contact forces and stresses. Very few of the studies considered the effects of the contact forces on the turnout structure and its components such as sleepers and bearers. Those previous studies neglected the dynamic forces and estimated the behavior of train-turnout interactions based on quasi-static calculations. In reality, turnouts are subjected to high impact forces, which can be higher than the permissible track forces. Consequently, a numerical model capable of determining impact forces was developed here, to evaluate the dynamic behaviors of a railway turnout and their effects on such turnout components as bearers, ballast, and so on. The model consists of a structured beam grillage laying on an elastic foundation with rigid wheelsets and a bogie. The model was verified by field measurements. The new insight stemmed from this study shows that neglecting the contribution of dynamic forces can result in the unsafe underestimation of train turnout behaviors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Railway Engineering and Dynamics · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham B152TT, UK
Birmingham Centre for Railway Research and Education, School of Engineering, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham B152TT, UK
School of Metallurgy and Materials, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham B152TT, UK
Loram Finland Oy, Yliopistonkatu 58 D, 33100 Tampere, Finland
Funding
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions · Japan Society for the Promotion of Science · European Commission
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. LCC analysis for switches and crossings: A case study from the Swedish Railway Network
2. Cornish, A. (2014). Life-Time Monitoring of in Service Switches and Crossings through Field Experimentation. [Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College London].
3. Identification of appropriate risk analysis techniques for railway turnout systems10.1080/13669877.2016.1264452 ↗
4. EIM-EFRTC-CER (2012). Market Strategy Report—Track Maintenance & Renewal, The Community of European Railway and Infrastructure Companies (CER).
5. Optimisation of railway crossing geometry considering a representative set of wheel profiles10.1080/00423114.2014.998242 ↗
6. Esveld, C. (2001). Modern Railway Track, Delft University of Technology. [2nd ed.].
7. Monitoring structural deterioration of railway turnout systems via dynamic wheel/rail interaction10.1016/j.csndt.2014.03.004 ↗
8. Combatting RCF on switch points by tuning elastic track properties10.1016/j.wear.2010.10.031 ↗
9. Torsional effect on track-support structures of railway turnouts crossing impact
10. Analysis of train/turnout vertical interaction using a fast numerical model and validation of that model10.1177/0954409713489118 ↗
11. Wheel/rail impacts at a railway turnout crossing10.1243/0954409981530733 ↗
12. Simulation of dynamic interaction between train and railway turnout10.1080/00423110500233487 ↗
13. Bayesian Network-based probability analysis of train derailments caused by various extreme weather patterns on railway turnouts10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.028 ↗
14. Analysis of the effect of repair welding/grinding on the performance of railway crossings using field measurements and finite element modeling10.1177/0954409717693960 ↗
15. A Bayesian network model for prediction of weather-related failures in railway turnout systems10.1016/j.eswa.2016.10.011 ↗
16. Rail accident analysis using large-scale investigations of train derailments on switches and crossings: Comparing the performances of a novel stochastic mathematical prediction and various assumptions10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.04.010 ↗
17. Risk-Based Maintenance Planning for Rail Fastening Systems10.1061/AJRUA6.0001012 ↗
18. Digital twin aided sustainability-based lifecycle management for railway turnout systems10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.156 ↗
19. A through-life evaluation of end-of-life rolling stocks considering asset recycling, energy recovering, and financial benefit10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.271 ↗
20. Evaluation of remaining fatigue life of concrete sleeper based on field loading conditions10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.06.086 ↗
21. Improvement of vehicle–turnout interaction by optimising the shape of crossing nose10.1080/00423114.2014.944870 ↗
22. Optimisation of support stiffness at railway crossings10.1080/00423114.2017.1404617 ↗
23. Influence of wheel–rail contact modelling on vehicle dynamic simulation10.1080/00423114.2015.1039550 ↗
24. Contact Conditions over Turnout Crossing Noses10.1088/1757-899X/471/6/062027 ↗
25. Dynamic train–turnout interaction in an extended frequency range using a detailed model of track dynamics10.1016/j.jsv.2008.08.028 ↗
26. Progressive failure of prestressed concrete sleepers under multiple high-intensity impact loads10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.06.002 ↗
27. Modelling and experimental validation of dynamic impact in 1:9 railway crossing panel10.1016/j.triboint.2017.09.036 ↗
28. A wheel set/crossing model regarding impact, sliding and deformation—Explicit finite element approach10.1016/j.wear.2012.07.033 ↗
29. 3D FE modelling and validation of frictional contact with partial slip in compression–shift–rolling evolution10.1080/23248378.2015.1094753 ↗
30. Metamodelling of wheel–rail normal contact in railway crossings with elasto-plastic material behaviour10.1007/s00366-018-0589-3 ↗
31. Analysis of a typical railway turnout sleeper system using grillage beam analogy10.1016/j.finel.2011.08.007 ↗
32. Nonlinear finite element modelling of railway turnout system considering bearer/sleeper-ballast interaction
33. Kaewunruen, S., Li, D., Remennikov, A., and Ishida, T. (2019, January 27–29). Dynamic Resistance and Rational Design of Railway Prestressed Concrete Sleepers. Proceedings of the fib Symposium 2019, Krakow, Poland.
34. Optimisation of the elastic track properties of turnout crossings10.1177/0954409714542478 ↗
35. Developments of the indirect method for measuring the high frequency dynamic stiffness of resilient elements10.1006/jsvi.1998.1492 ↗
36. The effect of track and vehicle parameters on wheel/rail vertical dynamic forces
37. Hamarat, M., Papaelias, M., Kaewunruen, S., and Silvast, M. (2019, January 13–15). Dynamic analysis of a railway turnout system under moving train loads. Proceedings of the Acoustics 2019, Milton Keynes, UK.
38. LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual
39. Dynamic vehicle–track interaction in switches and crossings and the influence of rail pad stiffness–field measurements and validation of a simulation model10.1080/00423114.2015.1012213 ↗
40. Evaluating degradation at railway crossings using axle box acceleration measurements10.3390/s17102236 ↗
41. Dynamic interaction between train and railway turnout: Full-scale field test and validation of simulation models10.1080/00423110801993144 ↗
42. RRSB (2000). Signing of Permissble Speeds and Speed Restrictions, Safety & Standards Directorate Railtrack PLC.
43. RRSB (1993). Permissible Track Forces for Railway Vehicles, Group Standards Railway Technical Centre.
44. Dynamics of a vehicle–track coupling system at a rail joint10.1177/0954409714552698 ↗
45. High-frequency vertical wheel–rail contact forces—Field measurements and influence of track irregularities10.1016/j.wear.2008.02.035 ↗
46. Schijve, J. (2001). Fatigue of Structures and Materials, Springer Science & Business Media.
47. Powrie, W., and Le Pen, L. (2016). A Guide to Track Stiffness, University of Southampton Press.
48. Weiss, B.N. (2008). Dynamic Properties of Railway Track and Its Components: A State-Of-The-Art Review, New Research on Acoustics, Nova Science Publishers.
49. European Committee for Standardization (2016). EN 13230: Parts 1. Railway Applications-Track-Concrete Sleepers and Bearers, European Committee for Standardization.
50. Tomosawa, F., and Noguchi, T. (2017, January 2–4). Relationship between compressive strength and modulus of elasticity of high-strength concrete. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Utilization of High-Strength Concrete, Montpellier, France.
51. Influence of time-dependent material degradation on life cycle serviceability of interspersed railway tracks due to moving train loads10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109625 ↗
52. A Novel Separation Technique of Flexural Loading-Induced Acoustic Emission Sources in Railway Prestressed Concrete Sleepers10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912011 ↗
53. Monitoring in-service performance of fibre-reinforced foamed urethane sleepers/bearers in railway urban turnout systems
54. Kaewunruen, S. (2015). Acoustic and dynamic characteristics of a complex urban turnout using fibre-reinforced foamed urethane (FFU) bearers. Noise and Vibration Mitigation for Rail Transportation Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-44832-8_45 ↗
55. Kaewunruen, S., You, R., and Ishida, M. (2017). Composites for timber-replacement bearers in railway switches and crossings. Infrastructures, 2.10.3390/infrastructures2040013 ↗
56. Introducing a new limit states design concept to railway concrete sleepers: An Australian experience10.3389/fmats.2014.00008 ↗
57. Grand challenges in transportation and transit systems10.3389/fbuil.2016.00004 ↗