journal article·2026-04-02Open access

Uncertainty-Aware Prediction of Unconfined Compressive Strength and Fracture Anisotropy in Deep Shales: A Leakage-Free Physics-Constrained Machine Learning Framework

Yicheng Song, Xinpu Shen

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 7

Abstract

The continuous prediction and uncertainty quantification of unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and the fracture-related index of anisotropy (FRIA) are essential for optimizing drilling operations and hydraulic fracturing design in shale gas development. However, machine-learning-based log inversion often suffers from (1) spatial information leakage caused by autocorrelation in well logs, (2) implicit target contamination during multi-source data fusion, and (3) biased evaluation under random data splitting, which can overestimate apparent performance and underestimate extrapolation risk in deep heterogeneous intervals. To address these limitations, we propose a leakage-free, physics-constrained framework for predicting UCS and FRIA in the Weiyuan shale gas reservoir. Using 18,440 quality-controlled, depth-aligned samples, we adopt a contiguous depth-based split that preserves stratigraphic continuity while isolating training, validation, and test intervals to block spatial leakage. Under a strict leakage-free protocol, we evaluate single-task ensemble trees (STL-RF/HGB), a multi-task neural network (MTL-MLP), and a physics-informed variant (PINN-MLP) for deep-interval stabilization. The best model is target-dependent: STL-RF achieves R2 = 0.984 for FRIA, whereas MTL-MLP attains R2 = 0.874 for UCS. For deep formations (>4800 m), PINN-MLP with a depth-continuity constraint reduces deep-interval prediction error by 47.5%. Multi-seed experiments with 95% Student’s t confidence intervals further confirm robustness. Overall, the framework provides a reproducible workflow for continuous geomechanical-parameter prediction and risk-aware deployment in deep unconventional reservoirs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Drilling and Well Engineering · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Petroleum Engineering, Liaoning Petrochemical University, Fushun 113001, China

Funding

Liaoning Petrochemical University

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Deep Learning and Process Understanding for Data-Driven Earth System Science10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1 ↗
2. Machine Learning for Data-Driven Discovery in Solid Earth Geoscience10.1126/science.aau0323 ↗
3. Zoback, M.D. (2007). Reservoir Geomechanics, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511586477 ↗
4. Shale Gas in China: Characteristics, Challenges and Prospects (I)10.1016/S1876-3804(15)30072-0 ↗
5. Cross-Validation Strategies for Data with Temporal, Spatial, Hierarchical, or Phylogenetic Structure10.1111/ecog.02881 ↗
6. Leakage and the Reproducibility Crisis in Machine-Learning-Based Science10.1016/j.patter.2023.100804 ↗
7. Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methods10.1007/s10994-021-05946-3 ↗
8. A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challenges10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.008 ↗
9. Empirical Relations between Rock Strength and Physical Properties in Sedimentary Rocks10.1016/j.petrol.2006.01.003 ↗
10. Predicting Rock Mechanical Properties of Carbonates from Wireline Logs (A Case Study: Arab-D Reservoir, Ghawar Field, Saudi Arabia)10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.01.017 ↗
11. Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) Prediction in Real-Time While Drilling Using Artificial Intelligence Tools10.1007/s00521-020-05546-7 ↗
12. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
13. Multitask Learning10.1023/A:1007379606734 ↗
14. Zhang, J., Liu, G., Wei, Z., Li, S., Zayier, Y., and Cheng, Y. (2025). Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Well Logs Guided by Rock Physics and Its Interpretation. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25030836 ↗
15. Results of Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Predicting Geo-Mechanical Properties of Stabilised Clays—A Review10.3390/geotechnics1010008 ↗
16. Zheng, X., Wu, B., Zhu, X., and Zhu, X. (2022). Multi-Task Deep Learning Seismic Impedance Inversion Optimization Based on Homoscedastic Uncertainty. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12031200 ↗
17. Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
18. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’16), San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
19. Deep Learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
20. Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives10.1109/TPAMI.2013.50 ↗
21. Spatial Validation Reveals Poor Predictive Performance of Large-Scale Ecological Mapping Models10.1038/s41467-020-18321-y ↗
22. Spatial Cross-Validation Is Not the Right Way to Evaluate Map Accuracy10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109692 ↗
23. Machine Learning-Based Global Maps of Ecological Variables and the Challenge of Assessing Them10.1038/s41467-022-29838-9 ↗
24. A Unifying View on Dataset Shift in Classification10.1016/j.patcog.2011.06.019 ↗
25. Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Solving Forward and Inverse Problems Involving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
26. Physics-Informed Machine Learning10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 ↗
27. Two-stage spatiotemporal decoupling configuration of SOP and multi-level electric-hydrogen hybrid energy storage based on feature extraction for distribution networks with ultra-high DG penetration10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126438 ↗
28. Domain knowledge-enhanced graph reinforcement learning method for Volt/Var control in distribution networks10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126409 ↗
29. Probabilistic Physics-Informed Neural Network for Seismic Petrophysical Inversion10.1190/geo2023-0214.1 ↗
30. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
31. Ansel, J., Yang, E., He, H., Gimelshein, N., Jain, A., Voznesensky, M., Bao, B., Bell, P., Berard, D., and Burovski, E. (May, January 27). PyTorch 2: Faster Machine Learning Through Dynamic Python Bytecode Transformation and Graph Compilation. Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS’24), La Jolla, CA, USA.
32. Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x ↗
33. From Local Explanations to Global Understanding with Explainable AI for Trees10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 ↗
34. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Springer. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 ↗
35. Vovk, V., Gammerman, A., and Shafer, G. (2005). Algorithmic Learning in a Random World, Springer.