A Review of Resilient IoT Systems: Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions
Source abstract
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) is increasingly embedded in critical infrastructures across healthcare, energy, transportation, and industrial automation, yet its pervasiveness introduces substantial security and resilience challenges. This paper presents a comprehensive review of recent advances in IoT resilience, focusing on developments reported between 2022 and 2025. A layered taxonomy is proposed to organize resilience strategies across hardware, network, learning, application, and governance layers, addressing adversarial, environmental, and hybrid stressors. The survey systematically classifies and compares more than forty representative studies encompassing deep learning under adversarial attack, generative and ensemble intrusion detection, hardware and protocol-level defenses, federated and distributed learning, and trust and governance-based approaches. A comparative analysis shows that while adversarial training, GAN-based augmentation, and decentralized learning improve robustness, their evidence is often confined to specific datasets or attack scenarios, with limited validation in large-scale deployments. The study highlights challenges in benchmarking adaptivity, cross-layer integration, and explainable resilience, concluding with future directions for creating antifragile IoT systems that can self-heal and adapt to evolving cyber–physical threats.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Smart Grid Security and Resilience · IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Information Technology, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 47512, Saudi Arabia
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Abikoye, O.C., Bajeh, A.O., Awotunde, J.B., Ameen, A.O., Mojeed, H.A., Abdulraheem, M., Oladipo, I.D., and Salihu, S.A. (2021). Application of internet of thing and cyber physical system in Industry 4.0 smart manufacturing. Emergence of Cyber Physical System and IoT in Smart Automation and Robotics: Computer Engineering in Automation, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-66222-6_14 ↗
2. Harnessing the power of Internet of Things based connectivity to improve healthcare10.1016/j.iot.2019.100074 ↗
3. Djenna, A., Harous, S., and Saidouni, D.E. (2021). Internet of things meet internet of threats: New concern cyber security issues of critical cyber infrastructure. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11104580 ↗
4. Mishra, P., and Singh, G. (2025). Internet of Vehicles for Sustainable Smart Cities: Opportunities, Issues, and Challenges. Smart Cities, 8.10.3390/smartcities8030093 ↗
5. Hussain, M.Z., and Hanapi, Z.M. (2023). Efficient secure routing mechanisms for the low-powered IoT network: A literature review. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12030482 ↗
6. Cyber threats to industrial IoT: A survey on attacks and countermeasures10.3390/iot2010009 ↗
7. Ntafloukas, K., McCrum, D.P., and Pasquale, L. (2022). A cyber-physical risk assessment approach for internet of things enabled transportation infrastructure. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12189241 ↗
8. Techniques in reliability of internet of things (IoT)10.1016/j.procs.2025.02.095 ↗
9. Nan, C., Sansavini, G., and Kröger, W. (2014). Building an integrated metric for quantifying the resilience of interdependent infrastructure systems. International Conference on Critical Information Infrastructures Security, Springer International Publishing.
10. Option-based design for resilient manufacturing systems10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.809 ↗
11. Modeling infrastructure resilience using Bayesian networks: A case study of inland waterway ports10.1016/j.cie.2016.01.007 ↗
12. Mottahedi, A., Sereshki, F., Ataei, M., Nouri Qarahasanlou, A., and Barabadi, A. (2021). The resilience of critical infrastructure systems: A systematic literature review. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14061571 ↗
13. Rekeraho, A., Cotfas, D.T., Balan, T.C., Cotfas, P.A., Acheampong, R., and Tuyishime, E. (2025). Cybersecurity Threat Modeling for IoT-Integrated Smart Solar Energy Systems: Strengthening Resilience for Global Energy Sustainability. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17062386 ↗
14. Panda, D., Padhy, N., and Sharma, K. (2025). Strengthening IoT Resilience: A Study on Backdoor Malware and DNS Spoofing Detection Methods. Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Emerging Systems and Intelligent Computing (ESIC), Bhubaneswar, India, 8–9 February 2025, IEEE.10.1109/ESIC64052.2025.10962564 ↗
15. Defending Against Neural Network Model Inversion Attacks via Data Poisoning10.1109/TNNLS.2025.3554656 ↗
16. Fares, S., and Nandakumar, K. (2024, January 16–22). Attack to defend: Exploiting adversarial attacks for detecting poisoned models. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.02335 ↗
17. Information-oriented traffic management for energy-efficient and loss-resilient IoT systems10.1109/JIOT.2021.3132925 ↗
18. Pioneering advanced security solutions for reinforcement learning-based adaptive key rotation in Zigbee networks10.1038/s41598-024-64895-8 ↗
19. Hardware security for internet of things identity assurance10.1109/COMST.2024.3355168 ↗
20. A survey on lightweight entity authentication with strong PUFs10.1145/2818186 ↗
21. Zero-trust foundation models: A new paradigm for secure and collaborative artificial intelligence for internet of things10.1109/JIOT.2025.3603957 ↗
22. A survey on adversarial attacks and defences10.1049/cit2.12028 ↗
23. A survey of adversarial defenses and robustness in nlp10.1145/3593042 ↗
24. IoT trust and reputation: A survey and taxonomy10.1186/s13677-023-00416-8 ↗
25. A survey on cyber-resilience approaches for cyber-physical systems
26. Resilience-by-design in 6G networks: Literature review and novel enabling concepts10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3480275 ↗
27. Cyber resilience in industrial networks: A state of the art, challenges, and future directions10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.101781 ↗
28. A survey on resilience in the iot: Taxonomy, classification, and discussion of resilience mechanisms10.1145/3462513 ↗
29. Grassi, V., Mirandola, R., and Perez-Palacin, D. (2023). Towards a conceptual characterization of antifragile systems. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C), L’Aquila, Italy, 13–17 March 2023, IEEE.10.1109/ICSA-C57050.2023.00036 ↗
30. Jin, M., and Lee, H. (2025). Position: Ai safety must embrace an antifragile perspective. arXiv.
31. The impact of the topology on cascading failures in a power grid model10.1016/j.physa.2014.01.056 ↗
32. Structural vulnerability analysis of electric power distribution grids10.1504/IJCIS.2016.081299 ↗
33. Characterising the security of power system topologies through a combined assessment of reliability, robustness, and resilience10.1016/j.esr.2022.100944 ↗
34. Parameter space design of robust control systems10.1109/TAC.1980.1102505 ↗
35. Alibašić, H. (2022). Strategic Resilience and Sustainability Planning: Management Strategies for Sustainable and Climate-Resilient Communities and Organizations, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-91159-1 ↗
36. Hyper-engaged citizenry, negative governance and resilience: Impediments to sustainable energy projects in the United States10.1016/j.erss.2023.103072 ↗
37. Advancing disaster resilience: The ethical dimensions of adaptability and adaptive leadership in public service organizations10.1080/10999922.2024.2388285 ↗
38. On the definition of cyber-physical resilience in power systems10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.193 ↗
39. Resilience of transportation systems: Concepts and comprehensive review10.1109/TITS.2018.2883766 ↗
40. Taleb, N.N. (2012). Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder, Random House.
41. Fragility, robustness and antifragility in deep learning10.1016/j.artint.2023.104060 ↗
42. Simpson, J., Oosthuizen, R., Sawah, S.E., and Abbass, H. (2021). Agile, antifragile, artificial-intelligence-enabled, command and control. arXiv.
43. Scotti, V., Perez-Palacin, D., Brauzi, V., Grassi, V., and Mirandola, R. (2025). Antifragility via Online Learning and Monitoring: An IoT Case Study, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie.10.1109/ACSOS66086.2025.00022 ↗
44. Engineering antifragile systems: A change in design philosophy10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.504 ↗
45. Beyond resilience: Towards antifragility?
46. Digital twin: Exploring the intersection of virtual and physical worlds10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3294985 ↗
47. A survey of iot-enabled cyberattacks: Assessing attack paths to critical infrastructures and services10.1109/COMST.2018.2855563 ↗
48. Denial-of-service in wireless sensor networks: Attacks and defenses10.1109/MPRV.2008.6 ↗
49. Securing underwater wireless sensor networks: A review of attacks and mitigation techniques10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3490498 ↗
50. Aslan, Ö., Aktuğ, S.S., Ozkan-Okay, M., Yilmaz, A.A., and Akin, E. (2023). A comprehensive review of cyber security vulnerabilities, threats, attacks, and solutions. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12061333 ↗
51. Data poisoning attacks on federated machine learning10.1109/JIOT.2021.3128646 ↗
52. Poisoning attacks in federated learning: A survey10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3238823 ↗
53. AI to protect AI: A modular pipeline for detecting label-flipping poisoning attacks
54. Zeng, Y., Pan, M., Just, H.A., Lyu, L., Qiu, M., and Jia, R. (2023, January 26–30). Narcissus: A practical clean-label backdoor attack with limited information. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Copenhagen, Denmark.10.1145/3576915.3616617 ↗
55. Survey on Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning: Current Trends, Categorization, Applications, Research Challenges, and Future Prospects10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3571995 ↗
56. Liang, Y., He, D., and Chen, D. (2019). Poisoning attack on load forecasting. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies-Asia (ISGT Asia), Chengdu, China, 21–24 May 2019, IEEE.10.1109/ISGT-Asia.2019.8881664 ↗
57. Alotaibi, A., and Rassam, M.A. (2023). Adversarial machine learning attacks against intrusion detection systems: A survey on strategies and defense. Future Internet, 15.10.3390/fi15020062 ↗
58. Goodfellow, I.J., Shlens, J., and Szegedy, C. (2014). Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. arXiv.
59. Kurakin, A., Goodfellow, I.J., and Bengio, S. (2018). Adversarial examples in the physical world. Artificial Intelligence Safety and Security, Chapman and Hall/CRC.10.1201/9781351251389-8 ↗
60. Madry, A., Makelov, A., Schmidt, L., Tsipras, D., and Vladu, A. (2017). Towards deep learning models resistant to adversarial attacks. arXiv.
61. Dong, Y., Liao, F., Pang, T., Su, H., Zhu, J., Hu, X., and Li, J. (2018, January 18–23). Boosting adversarial attacks with momentum. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00957 ↗
62. Moosavi-Dezfooli, S.M., Fawzi, A., and Frossard, P. (2016, January 27–30). Deepfool: A simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.282 ↗
63. Generation and Countermeasures of adversarial examples on vision: A survey10.1007/s10462-024-10841-z ↗
64. Zheng, S., Han, D., Lu, C., Hou, C., Han, Y., Hao, X., and Zhang, C. (2025). Transferable Targeted Adversarial Attack on Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Image Recognition. Remote Sens., 17.10.3390/rs17010146 ↗
65. Li, J., Xu, Y., Hu, Y., Ma, Y., and Yin, X. (2024). You Only Attack Once: Single-Step DeepFool Algorithm. Appl. Sci., 15.10.20944/preprints202412.1018.v1 ↗
66. Deep learning model inversion attacks and defenses: A comprehensive survey10.1007/s10462-025-11248-0 ↗
67. Zhao, K., Li, L., Ding, K., Gong, N.Z., Zhao, Y., and Dong, Y. (2025). A Systematic Survey of Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives. arXiv.10.1145/3711896.3736573 ↗
68. Fang, H., Qiu, Y., Yu, H., Yu, W., Kong, J., Chong, B., Chen, B., Wang, X., Xia, S.-T., and Xu, K. (2024). Privacy leakage on dnns: A survey of model inversion attacks and defenses. arXiv.
69. Gps spoofing attacks in fanets: A systematic literature review10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3281731 ↗
70. Parameswarath, R.P., Abhishek, N.V., and Sikdar, B. (2023). A quantum safe authentication protocol for remote keyless entry systems in cars. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 98th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2023-Fall), Hong Kong, China, 10–13 October 2023, IEEE.10.1109/VTC2023-Fall60731.2023.10333825 ↗
71. Radio frequency fingerprint identification for device authentication in the internet of things10.1109/MCOM.003.2200974 ↗
72. Coston, I., Plotnizky, E., and Nojoumian, M. (2025). Comprehensive Study of IoT Vulnerabilities and Countermeasures. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15063036 ↗
73. Physical Layer-Based Device Fingerprinting For Wireless Security: From Theory To Practice10.1109/TIFS.2025.3570118 ↗
74. Self-synchronized encryption for physical layer in 10gbps optical links10.1109/TC.2018.2890259 ↗
75. Lightweight and host-based denial of service (DoS) detection and defense mechanism for resource-constrained IoT devices10.1016/j.iot.2020.100319 ↗
76. Pu, C. (2019). Energy depletion attack against routing protocol in the Internet of Things. Proceedings of the 2019 16th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 11–14 January 2019, IEEE.10.1109/CCNC.2019.8651771 ↗
77. Bandwidth control mechanism and extreme gradient boosting algorithm for protecting software-defined networks against DDoS attacks10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3033942 ↗
78. A Low-rate DoS Attack Mitigation Scheme Based on Port and Traffic State in SDN10.1109/TC.2025.3541143 ↗
79. Raikwar, M., and Gligoroski, D. (2021, January 10–11). Non-interactive vdf client puzzle for dos mitigation. Proceedings of the 2021 European Interdisciplinary Cybersecurity Conference, Virtual.10.1145/3487405.3487406 ↗
80. Filter aggregation for DDoS prevention systems: Hardware perspective10.1007/s10207-025-01029-9 ↗
81. Malhotra, P., Singh, Y., Anand, P., Bangotra, D.K., Singh, P.K., and Hong, W.C. (2021). Internet of things: Evolution, concerns and security challenges. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21051809 ↗
82. Understanding the limits of LoRaWAN10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600613 ↗
83. Abdallah, B., Khriji, S., Chéour, R., Lahoud, C., Moessner, K., and Kanoun, O. (2024). Improving the reliability of long-range communication against interference for non-line-of-sight conditions in industrial Internet of Things applications. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14020868 ↗
84. Ghanem, A. (2022). Security Analysis of Rolling Code-Based Remote Keyless Entry Systems. [Ph.D. Thesis, Ain Shams University].
85. Rollback: A new time-agnostic replay attack against the automotive remote keyless entry systems10.1145/3627827 ↗
86. Tsunoda, Y., and Fujiwara, Y. (2023). The Asymptotics of Difference Systems of Sets for Synchronization and Phase Detection. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), Taipei, Taiwan, 25–30 June 2023, IEEE.10.1109/ISIT54713.2023.10206585 ↗
87. Huang, P., Chen, G., Zhang, X., Liu, C., Wang, H., Shen, H., Bian, Y., Lu, Y., Ruan, Z., and Li, B. (2025). Fast and Scalable Selective Retransmission for RDMA. Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2025-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, London, UK, 19–22 May 2025, IEEE.10.1109/INFOCOM55648.2025.11044566 ↗
88. Wu, Z., Zhang, Y., Tian, F., Wu, M., Zhai, A., and Zhang, Z.L. (2024). Interleaved Function Stream Execution Model for Cache-Aware High-Speed Stateful Packet Processing. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 44th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), Jersey City, NJ, USA, 23–26 July 2024, IEEE.10.1109/ICDCS60910.2024.00056 ↗
89. Toward the Internet of Medical Things for Real-Time Health Monitoring Over Wi-Fi10.1109/MNET.2024.3352598 ↗
90. Gautam, M.K., Pati, A., Mishra, S.K., Appasani, B., Kabalci, E., Bizon, N., and Thounthong, P. (2021). A comprehensive review of the evolution of networked control system technology and its future potentials. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13052962 ↗
91. On the anti-interference tolerance of cognitive frequency hopping communication systems10.1109/TR.2020.3002105 ↗
92. Wang, S., Dai, W., Sun, J., Xu, Z., and Li, G.Y. (2025). Uncertainty awareness in wireless communications and sensing. IEEE Communications Magazine, IEEE.10.1109/MCOM.001.2400714 ↗
93. Reinfurt, L., Breitenbücher, U., Falkenthal, M., Leymann, F., and Riegg, A. (2016, January 6–10). Internet of things patterns. Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, Irsee, Germany.10.1145/3011784.3011789 ↗
94. EDMA-RM: An Event-Driven and Mobility-Aware Resource Management Framework for Green IoT-Edge-Fog-Cloud Networks10.1109/JSEN.2024.3404470 ↗
95. Energy efficient data compression in cloud based IoT10.1109/JSEN.2021.3064611 ↗
96. Towards energy-aware tinyML on battery-less IoT devices10.1016/j.iot.2023.100736 ↗
97. Energy consumption of on-device machine learning models for IoT intrusion detection10.1016/j.iot.2022.100670 ↗
98. MeasureX (2025, November 12). Understanding Pressure Sensor Drift: Causes, Effects & How to Prevent It. Available online: https://www.measurex.com.au.
99. Memory-based combination PUFs for device authentication in embedded systems10.1109/TMSCS.2018.2885758 ↗
100. Adaptive recalibration algorithm for removing sensor errors and its applications in motion tracking10.1109/JSEN.2018.2804941 ↗