journal article·2026-01-29Open access

Experimental Investigation and Predictive Modeling of Surface Roughness in Dry Turning of AISI 1045 Steel Using Power-Law and Response Surface Approaches

Thanh-Hung Vu, Cheung-Hwa Hsu

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 3

Abstract

Dry machining of AISI 1045 steel is attractive for sustainable manufacturing but makes it more challenging to control surface roughness Ra. This work investigates dry turning of AISI 1045 using a 23 factorial design with three center points (11 runs) and compares a traditional power-law correlation with a quadratic response surface model (RSM). The power-law fit on log-log data explains only about 20% of the variance, whereas the quadratic RSM achieves R2 ≈ 0.98 with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.62–0.77 µm based on leave-one-out cross-validation and bootstrap resampling. Feed rate S is identified as the dominant factor, while cutting speed V and depth of cut t have secondary but non-negligible interactive effects. Sobol global sensitivity indices confirm that S and S2 account for more than half of the output variance. The optimized setting within the tested domain (V ≈ 83 m/min, S = 0.60 mm/rev, t = 0.10 mm) yields a predicted Ra ≈ 5.3 µm, appropriate for semi-roughing prior to grinding. The proposed framework combines small-sample RSM, Lasso regularization, uncertainty quantification and Sobol analysis to provide an uncertainty-aware model for optimizing dry-turning parameters of AISI 1045 steel.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Scientific and Engineering Research Topics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mold and Die Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Davim, J.P. (2011). Machining of Hard Materials, Springer.10.1007/978-1-84996-450-0 ↗
2. Astakhov, V.P. (2006). Tribology of Metal Cutting, Elsevier.
3. Effect of Machining Parameters on Surface Roughness for Different Type of Materials10.1088/1757-899X/530/1/012008 ↗
4. Sustainable machining: Selection of optimum turning conditions based on minimum energy considerations10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.025 ↗
5. Prediction of Surface Roughness in Hard Turning10.1016/j.measurement.2016.06.048 ↗
6. Makhesana, M.A., Bagga, P.J., Patel, K.M., and Taha-Tijerina, J.J. (2023). Effects of Machining Parameters of C45 Steel Applying Vegetable Lubricant with Minimum Quantity Cooling Lubrication (MQCL). Lubricants, 11.10.3390/lubricants11080332 ↗
7. Kuntoğlu, M., Acar, O., Gupta, M.K., Sağlam, H., Sarikaya, M., Giasin, K., and Pimenov, D.Y. (2021). Parametric Optimization for Cutting Forces and Material Removal Rate in the Turning of AISI 5140. Machines, 9.10.3390/machines9050090 ↗
8. Surface quality in dry machining of 55Cr3 steel bars
9. Optimization of machining parameters for turning operations based on response surface methodology10.1016/j.measurement.2012.11.026 ↗
10. Magalhães, L.C., Carlesso, G.C., López de Lacalle, L.N., Souza, M.T., de Oliveira Palheta, F., and Binder, C. (2022). Tool Wear Effect on Surface Integrity in AISI 1045 Steel Dry Turning. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15062031 ↗
11. Dry turning performance of TiN–WSx/TiN hard-lubricious bilayer composite coating10.1080/10910344.2020.1765176 ↗
12. Modeling and Optimization of Carbon Steel AISI 1045 Surface Roughness in CNC Turning Based on RSM and Heuristic Optimization Algorithms
13. Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00861-6 ↗
14. Felho, C., and Varga, G. (2022). Theoretical Roughness Modeling of Hard Turned Surfaces Considering Tool Wear. Machines, 10.10.3390/machines10030188 ↗
15. Antosz, K., Kozłowski, E., Sęp, J., and Prucnal, S. (2025). Application of Machine Learning to the Prediction of Surface Roughness in the Milling Process on the Basis of Sensor Signals. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18010148 ↗
16. Machine learning-based surface roughness prediction in magnetorheological finishing of polyamide influenced by initial conditions
17. Chen, J., Lin, J., Zhang, M., and Lin, Q. (2024). Predicting Surface Roughness in Turning Complex-Structured Workpieces Using Vibration-Signal-Based Gaussian Process Regression. Sensors, 24.10.20944/preprints202402.0486.v1 ↗
18. Uncertainty Quantification and Optimal Robust Design for Machining Operations10.1115/1.4055039 ↗
19. (2021). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Profile—Part 2: Terms, Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters (Standard No. ISO 21920-2:2021).
20. (2021). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Profile—Part 3: Specification Operators (Standard No. ISO 21920-3:2021).
21. Nguyen, D.C., Hai, D.T., Vu, N.P., Long, B.T., Puta, H., and Sattler, K.-U. (2022). Study on Productivity Improvement When Turning AISI 1045 Steel on Basis of Surface Roughness Assurance. Advances in Engineering Research and Application, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Research and Applications, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam, 1–2 December 2022, Springer.
22. A Review of Dry Machining and Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) in Turning Processes10.1007/s00170-017-0142-3 ↗
23. Revealing the benefits of entropy weights method for multi-objective optimization in machining operations: A critical review10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.114 ↗
24. Estimation of cutting temperature using machine learning based on signal information received from power analyzer in vortex machining conditions10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.02.004 ↗