Improved Lightweight Marine Oil Spill Detection Using the YOLOv8 Algorithm
Source abstract
Abstract
Marine oil spill detection using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) is crucial but challenged by dynamic marine conditions, diverse spill scales, and limitations in existing algorithms regarding model size and real-time performance. To address these challenges, we propose LSFE-YOLO, a YOLOv8s-optimized (You Only Look Once version 8) lightweight model with an original, domain-tailored synergistic integration of FasterNet, GN-LSC Head (GroupNorm Lightweight Shared Convolution Head), and C2f_MBE (C2f Mobile Bottleneck Enhanced). FasterNet serves as the backbone (25% neck width reduction), leveraging partial convolution (PConv) to minimize memory access and redundant computations—overcoming traditional lightweight backbones’ high memory overhead—laying the foundation for real-time deployment while preserving feature extraction. The proposed GN-LSC Head replaces YOLOv8’s decoupled head: its shared convolutions reduce parameter redundancy by approximately 40%, and GroupNorm (Group Normalization) ensures stable accuracy under edge computing’s small-batch constraints, outperforming BatchNorm (Batch Normalization) in resource-limited scenarios. The C2f_MBE module integrates EffectiveSE (Effective Squeeze and Excitation)-optimized MBConv (Mobile Inverted Bottleneck Convolution) into C2f: MBConv’s inverted-residual design enhances multi-scale feature capture, while lightweight EffectiveSE strengthens discriminative oil spill features without extra computation, addressing the original C2f’s scale variability insufficiency. Additionally, an SE (Squeeze and Excitation) attention mechanism embedded upstream of SPPF (Spatial Pyramid Pooling Fast) suppresses background interference (e.g., waves, biological oil films), synergizing with FasterNet and C2f_MBE to form a cascaded feature optimization pipeline that refines representations throughout the model. Experimental results show that LSFE-YOLO improves mAP (mean Average Precision) by 1.3% and F1 score by 1.7% over YOLOv8s, while achieving substantial reductions in model size (81.9%), parameter count (82.9%), and computational cost (84.2%), alongside a 20 FPS (Frames Per Second) increase in detection speed. LSFE-YOLO offers an efficient and effective solution for real-time marine oil spill detection.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation · Advanced Neural Network Applications · Fire Detection and Safety Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Computer and Information Engineering, Hei Longjiang University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150022, China
Civil and Construction Engineering, College of Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. State of the art satellite and airborne marine oil spill remote sensing: Application to the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill10.1016/j.rse.2012.03.024 ↗
2. Oil spill detection by satellite remote sensing10.1016/j.rse.2004.11.015 ↗
3. Wan, J., and Cheng, Y. (2013). Remote sensing monitoring of Gulf of Mexico oil spill using ENVISAT ASAR images. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Geoinformatics, IEEE.10.1109/Geoinformatics.2013.6626165 ↗
4. The extended Bragg scattering model-based method for ship and oil-spill observation using compact polarimetric SAR10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2359141 ↗
5. Oil spill detection based on deep convolutional neural networks using polarimetric scattering information from Sentinel-1 SAR images
6. Oil spill contextual and boundary-supervised detection network based on marine SAR images
7. Extended oil spill spreading with Langmuir circulation10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.06.047 ↗
8. Keramea, P., Spanoudak, K., Zodiatis, G., Gikas, G., and Sylaios, G. (2021). Oil spill modeling: A critical review on current trends, perspectives, and challenges. Mar. Sci. Eng., 9.10.3390/jmse9020181 ↗
9. An improved Otsu method for oil spill detection from SAR images10.1016/j.oceano.2017.03.005 ↗
10. SAR image oil spill detection based on maximum entropy threshold segmentation
11. Kim, D., and Jung, H. (2018). Mapping oil spills from dual-polarized SAR images using an artificial neural network: Application to oil spill in the Kerch Strait in November 2007. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18072237 ↗
12. Oil Spill Identification and Monitoring from Sentinel-1 SAR satellite earth observations: A machine learning approach
13. Dong, X., Li, J., Li, B., Jin, Y., and Miao, S. (2023). Marine oil spill detection from low-quality SAR remote sensing images. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.3390/jmse11081552 ↗
14. A lightweight SSV2-YOLO based model for detection of sugarcane aphids in unstructured natural environments10.1016/j.compag.2023.107961 ↗
15. Xiong, Y., and Meng, X. (2019). A SAR oil spill image recognition method based on densenet convolutional neural network. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Image and Remote Sensing (ICRIS), IEEE.
16. A novel deep learning method for marine oil spill detection from satellite synthetic aperture radar imagery10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113666 ↗
17. Chen, J., Kao, S.H., He, H., Zhuo, W., Wen, S., Lee, C.H., and Chan, S.H.G. (2023, January 17–24). Run, Don’t Walk: Chasing Higher FLOPS for Faster Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
18. Ferrari, V., Hebert, M., Sminchisescu, C., and Weiss, Y. (2018). Group Normalization. Computer Vision—ECCV 2018, Proceedings of the ECCV 2018, Munich, Germany, 8—14 September 2018, Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.10.1007/978-3-030-01240-3 ↗
19. Hu, J., Shen, L., and Sun, G. (2018, January 18–22). Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00745 ↗
20. Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., and Chen, L.-C. (2018, January 18–22). MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474 ↗
21. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2025, December 31). OSPO Ocean Products [Online]; NOAA: Washington, DC, USA, n.d, Available online: https://www.ospo.noaa.gov/Products/ocean/.
22. (2025, December 31). Alaska Satellite Facility (ASF). ASF Data Search Portal [Online]; University of Alaska Fairbanks: Fairbanks, AK, USA, n.d. Available online: https://search.asf.alaska.edu/.
23. Wang, C.-Y., Bochkovskiy, A., and Liao, H.-Y.M. (2023). YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectors. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE.10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00721 ↗
24. Wang, G., Wang, J., Nie, Z., Yang, H., and Yu, S. (2023). A Lightweight YOLOv8 Tomato Detection Algorithm Combining Feature Enhancement and Attention. Agronomy, 13.10.3390/agronomy13071824 ↗
25. Nonwoven defect detection by fusing selection kernel attention
26. Dense detection algorithm for ceramic tile defects based on improved YOLOv810.1007/s10845-024-02523-y ↗
27. Lee, Y., and Park, J. (2020). Centermask: Real-time anchor-free instance segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01392 ↗
28. Liu, J., Xu, Y., Li, H., and Guo, J. (2021). Soil Moisture Retrieval in Farmland Areas with Sentinel Multi-Source Data Based on Regression Convolutional Neural Network. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21030877 ↗
29. Zhao, Y., Lv, W., Xu, S., Wei, J., Wang, G., Dang, Q., Liu, Y., and Chen, J. (2024). Detrs beat yolos on real-time object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE.10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01605 ↗
30. Peng, Y., and Ji, Y. (2023). Road Crack Detection Algorithm Based on Improved YOLOv8. Proceedings of the ICAICA 2023, IEEE.
31. Lv, X., Duan, F., Jiang, J., Fu, X., and Gan, L. (2020). Deep metallic surface defect detection: The new benchmark and detection network. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20061650 ↗
32. Bento, J., Paixão, T., and Alvarez, A.B. (2025). Performance Evaluation of YOLOv8, YOLOv9, YOLOv10, and YOLOv11 for Stamp Detection in Scanned Documents. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15063154 ↗
33. Wang, A., Chen, H., Liu, L., Chen, K., Lin, Z., Han, J., and Ding, G. (2024). YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detection. arXiv.
34. YOLO advances to its genesis: A decadal and comprehensive review of the You Only Look Once (YOLO) series10.1007/s10462-025-11253-3 ↗
35. Navin, N., Farid, F.A., Rakin, R.Z., Tanzim, S.S., Rahman, M., Rahman, S., Uddin, J., and Karim, H.A. (2025). Bilingual Sign Language Recognition: A YOLOv11-Based Model for Bangla and English Alphabets. J. Imaging, 11.10.3390/jimaging11050134 ↗