journal article·2025-12-16Open access

Object-Based Random Forest Approach for High-Resolution Mapping of Urban Green Space Dynamics in a University Campus

Bakhrul Midad, Rahmihafiza Hanafi, Muhammad Aufaristama, Irwan Ary Dharmawan

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 24

Abstract

Urban green space is essential for ecological functions, environmental quality, and human well-being, yet campus expansion can reduce vegetated areas. This study assessed UGS dynamics at Universitas Padjadjaran’s Jatinangor campus from 2015 to 2025 and evaluated an object-based machine learning approach for fine-scale land cover mapping. High-resolution WorldView-2, WorldView-3, and Legion-03 imagery were pan-sharpened, geometrically corrected, normalized, and used to compute NDVI and NDWI indices. Object-based image analysis segmented the imagery into homogeneous objects, followed by random forest classification into six land cover classes; UGS was derived from dense and sparse vegetation. Accuracy assessment included confusion matrices, overall accuracy 0.810–0.860, kappa coefficients 0.747–0.826, weighted F1 scores 0.807–0.860, and validation with 43 field points. The total UGS increased from 68.89% to 74.69%, bare land decreased from 13.49% to 5.81%, and building areas moderately increased from 10.36% to 11.52%. The maps captured vegetated and developed zones accurately, demonstrating the reliability of the classification approach. These findings indicate that campus expansion has been managed without compromising ecological integrity, providing spatially explicit, reliable data to inform sustainable campus planning and support green campus initiatives.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Urban Green Space and Health · Urban Heat Island Mitigation · Urban Agriculture and Sustainability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Geophysics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Ir. Soekarno Km 21, Sumedang 45363, West Java, Indonesia

Campus Safety and Security Center, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Ir. Soekarno Km 21, Sumedang 45363, West Java, Indonesia

Department of Geosciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates

Funding

Hibah Penugasan Unpad · Universitas Padjadjaran through the Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education · EQUITY Program

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces—A systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research10.1016/j.eiar.2014.08.007 ↗
2. Government of Indonesia (2007). Law No. 26/2007 on Spatial Planning, State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia No. 68.
3. Government of Sumedang Regency (2012). Regional Regulation No. 2/2012 on the Regional Spatial Plan for 2011–2031.
4. The effects of green open spaces on microclimate and thermal comfort in three integrated campuses in Yogyakarta, Indonesia10.14710/geoplanning.10.1.37-44 ↗
5. Forty years of urban expansion in Beijing: What is the relative importance of physical, socio-economic, and neighborhood factors?
6. Sijabat, K.R., Aufaristama, M., Arief, M.C.W., and Dharmawan, I.A. (2025). Integrating Remote Sensing and Street View Imagery with Deep Learning for Urban Slum Mapping: A Case Study from Bandung City. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15148044 ↗
7. Classifying Urban Green Spaces using a combined Sentinel-2 and Random Forest approach
8. Guo, Q., Zhang, J., Guo, S., Ye, Z., Deng, H., Hou, X., and Zhang, H. (2022). Urban tree classification based on object-oriented approach and Random Forest algorithm using UAV multispectral imagery. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14163885 ↗
9. Application of high-resolution remote-sensing data for land use/land cover mapping of university campus10.1155/2021/5519011 ↗
10. Object-based image analysis for remote sensing10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004 ↗
11. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
12. Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011 ↗
13. Universitas Padjadjaran (2025, September 20). Kampus Jatinangor. Available online: https://www.unpad.ac.id/kampus-jatinangor/.
14. Maxar Technologies (2015). Satellite Imagery Data from WorldView-2, Maxar.
15. Maxar Technologies (2017). Satellite Imagery Data from WorldView-2, Maxar.
16. Maxar Technologies (2021). Satellite Imagery Data from WorldView-3, Maxar.
17. Maxar Technologies (2025). Satellite Imagery Data from Legion-03, Maxar.
18. Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Tan, H., Xu, C., Ma, X., and Xu, T. (2019). Region merging method for remote sensing spectral image aided by inter-segment and boundary homogeneities. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11121414 ↗
19. Jensen, J.R. (2015). Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, Pearson Prentice Hall. [4th ed.].
20. Weier, J., and Herring, D. (2025, September 22). Measuring Vegetation (NDVI & EVI). NASA Earth Observatory, Available online: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/MeasuringVegetation.
21. The use of the normalized difference water index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features10.1080/01431169608948714 ↗
22. Han, J., Kamber, M., and Pei, J. (2012). Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, Morgan Kaufmann. [3rd ed.].
23. Hay, G.J., and Castilla, G. (December, January 30). Object-based image analysis: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT). Proceedings of the Remote Sensing Support to Crop Yield Forecast and Area Estimates, Stresa, Italy.
24. Multi-scale object-based image analysis and feature selection of multi-sensor earth observation imagery using random forests10.1080/01431161.2011.649864 ↗
25. Mean shift: A robust approach toward feature space analysis10.1109/34.1000236 ↗
26. Stratoulias, D., and Grekousis, G. (2021). Information extraction and population estimates of settlements from historic Corona satellite imagery in the 1960s. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21072423 ↗
27. De Luca, G., Silva, N., Cerasoli, S., Araújo, J., Campos, J., Di Fazio, S., and Modica, G. (2019). Object-based land cover classification of cork oak woodlands using UAV imagery and Orfeo ToolBox. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11101238 ↗
28. Image segmentation techniques10.1016/S0734-189X(85)90153-7 ↗
29. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B ↗
30. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00295-4 ↗
31. A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002 ↗
32. Multi-branch and multi-label tree species classification using deep learning for UAV aerial photography and Sentinel remote sensing images10.1038/s41598-025-19827-5 ↗
33. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales10.1177/001316446002000104 ↗
34. Radoux, J., and Bogaert, P. (2017). Good practices for object-based accuracy assessment. Remote Sens., 9.10.3390/rs9070646 ↗
35. Kohavi, R. (1995, January 20–25). A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Montreal, QC, Canada.
36. Cross-validation for imbalanced datasets: Avoiding overoptimistic and overfitting approaches10.1109/MCI.2018.2866730 ↗
37. Changes in vegetation cover using GIS and remote sensing: A case study of South Campus BHU, Mirzapur, India
38. Detection of Vegetation Cover Changes from 1988–2022 in the University of Baghdad Campus by Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI))10.1088/1755-1315/1262/4/042054 ↗
39. Spectral mixture analysis of the urban landscape in Indianapolis with Landsat ETM+ imagery10.14358/PERS.70.9.1053 ↗
40. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data10.2307/2529310 ↗