Hybrid Deep Learning Framework for Forecasting Ground-Level Ozone in a North Texas Urban Region
Source abstract
Abstract
Ground-level ozone is a critical secondary air pollutant and greenhouse gas, especially in urban oil and gas regions, where it poses severe public health and environmental risks. Urban areas in North Texas have experienced persistently elevated ozone levels over the past two decades despite emission control efforts, highlighting the need for advanced forecasting tools. This study presents a hybrid recurrent neural network (RNN) model that combines Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) architectures to predict 8 h average ground-level ozone concentrations over a full annual cycle. The model leverages one-hour lagged ozone precursor pollutants (VOC and NOx) and seven meteorological variables, using a novel framework designed to capture complex temporal dependencies and spatiotemporal variability in environmental data. Trained and validated on multi-year datasets from two distinctly different urban air quality monitoring sites, the model achieved high predictive accuracy (R2 ≈ 0.97, IoA > 0.96), outperforming standalone LSTM and Random Forest models by 6–12%. Beyond statistical performance, the model incorporates Shapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) analysis to provide mechanistic interpretability, revealing the dominant roles of relative humidity, temperature, solar radiation, and precursor concentrations in modulating ozone levels. These findings demonstrate the model’s effectiveness in learning the nonlinear dynamics of ozone formation, outperforming traditional statistical models, and offering a reliable tool for long-term ozone forecasting and regional air quality management.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of North Texas, 3940 North Elm Street, Denton, TX 76207, USA
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of North Texas, 3940 North Elm Street, Denton, TX 76207, USA
References (92)
Show source-provided references
1. Outdoor Air Pollution: Ozone Health Effects10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31803b8e8c ↗
2. WHO (2025, August 03). Review of Evidence on Health Aspects of Air Pollution–RE-VIHAAP Project: Technical Report. Tech. Doc. WHO/EURO:2013-4101-43860-61757. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/341712/WHO-EURO-2013-4101-43860-61757-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
3. Who is more affected by ozone pollution? A systematic review and metaanalysis10.1093/aje/kwu115 ↗
4. Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Present-day tropospheric ozone distribution and trends relevant to vegetation10.1525/elementa.302 ↗
5. Tropospheric ozone assessment report: Present-day ozone distribution and trends relevant to human health
6. U.S. EPA (2025, August 16). Health Effects of Ozone Pollution, Available online: https://www.epa.gov/ground-level-ozone-pollution/health-effects-ozone-pollution.
7. Closing the global ozone yield gap: Quantification and co benefits for multi stress tolerance10.1111/gcb.14381 ↗
8. Predicting ozone levels from climatic parameters and leaf traits of Bel-W3 tobacco variety10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.130 ↗
9. A regional modelling study of the high ozone episode of June 2001 in southern Ontario10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.01.030 ↗
10. Separately resolving NOx and VOC contributions to ozone formation10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119224 ↗
11. Tropospheric ozone and NOx: A review of worldwide variation and meteorological influences10.1016/j.eti.2022.102809 ↗
12. Long short-term memory neural network for air pollutant concentration predictions: Method development and evaluation10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.114 ↗
13. A novel spatiotemporal convolutional long short-term neural network for air pollution prediction10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.086 ↗
14. Combining Land-Use Regression and Chemical Transport Modeling in a Spatiotemporal Geostatistical Model for Ozone and PM2.510.1021/acs.est.5b06001 ↗
15. Sensitivity analysis of ground level ozone in India using WRF-CMAQ models10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.036 ↗
16. Modeling emissions for three-dimensional atmospheric chemistry transport models10.1080/10962247.2018.1424057 ↗
17. Vander Hoorn, S., Johnson, J.S., Murray, K., Smit, R., Heyworth, J., Lam, S., and Cope, M. (2022). Emulation of a Chemical Transport Model to Assess Air Quality under Future Emission Scenarios for the Southwest of Western Australia. Atmosphere, 13.10.3390/atmos13122009 ↗
18. The impact of differences in large-scale circulation output from climate models on the regional modeling of ozone and PM10.5194/acp-12-9441-2012 ↗
19. Griffith, D., Chun, Y., and Dean, D. (2017). Application of Spatio-Temporal Clustering For Predicting Ground-Level Ozone Pollution. Advances in Geocomputation. Advances in Geographic Information Science, Springer.
20. Comparative analysis of meteorological performance of coupled chemistry-meteorology models in the context of AQMEII phase 210.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.032 ↗
21. A multi-model comparison of meteorological drivers of surface ozone over Europe, Atmos
22. The use of NOy, H2O2, and HNO3 as indicators for ozone-NOx-hydrocarbon sensitivity in urban locations10.1029/94JD02953 ↗
23. Wild, O., and Prather, M. (2006). Global tropospheric ozone modeling: Quantifying errors due to grid resolution. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 111.10.1029/2005JD006605 ↗
24. Representing ozone extremes in European megacities: The importance of resolution in a global chemistry climate model10.5194/acp-14-3899-2014 ↗
25. Fully equivalent operational models for atmospheric chemical kinetics within global chemistry-transport models10.1029/1999JD900830 ↗
26. Online coupled regional meteorology chemistry models in Europe: Current status and prospects10.5194/acp-14-317-2014 ↗
27. Improving of local ozone forecasting by integrated models10.1007/s11356-016-6989-2 ↗
28. Measurement and prediction of ozone levels around a heavily industrialized area: A neural network approach10.1016/S1093-0191(00)00042-3 ↗
29. Ground-level Ozone Prediction Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Case Study in Amman, Jordan10.1007/s11633-020-1233-4 ↗
30. Machine learning versus linear regression modelling approach for accurate ozone concentrations prediction
31. Instance-based learning algorithms10.1023/A:1022689900470 ↗
32. An Introduction to Kernel and Nearest-Neighbor Nonparametric Regression10.1080/00031305.1992.10475879 ↗
33. Support-vector networks10.1023/A:1022627411411 ↗
34. Multivariate methods to predict ground level ozone during daytime, nighttime, and critical conversion time in urban areas10.5094/APR.2015.081 ↗
35. Sinharay, S. (2010). An Overview of Statistics in Education. International Encyclopedia of Education, Elsevier. [3rd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01719-X ↗
36. Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines
37. Srinivas, A.S., Somula, R., Govinda, K., and Manivannan, S.S. (2019). Predicting ozone layer concentration using machine learning techniques. Social Network Forensics. Cyber Security, and Machine Learning, Springer.10.1007/978-981-13-1456-8_7 ↗
38. Unveiling tropospheric ozone by the traditional atmospheric model and machine learning, and their comparison: A case study in Hangzhou, China10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.101 ↗
39. Spatial and seasonal characteristics of particulate matter and gaseous pollution in China: Implications for control policy10.1016/j.envpol.2019.02.038 ↗
40. An Junlin, Hybrid machine learning model for hourly ozone concentrations prediction and exposure risk assessment10.1016/j.apr.2023.101916 ↗
41. Comparing different methods for statistical modeling of particulate matter in Tehran10.1007/s11869-018-0615-z ↗
42. Prediction of PM2.5 concentration based on the similarity in air quality monitoring network10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.03.058 ↗
43. Machine Learning-Based Algorithm for Channel Selection Utilizing Preemptive Resume Priority in Cognitive Radio Networks Validated by Ns-210.1007/s00034-019-01140-y ↗
44. A comparison of machine learning methods for ozone pollution prediction10.1186/s40537-023-00748-x ↗
45. Juarez, E.K., and Petersen, M.R. (2022). A Comparison of Machine Learning Methods to Forecast Tropospheric Ozone Levels in Delhi. Atmosphere, 13.10.3390/atmos13010046 ↗
46. Spatiotemporal variations of air pollutants and ozone prediction using machine learning algorithms in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from 2014 to 202110.1016/j.envpol.2022.119420 ↗
47. Prediction of hourly ozone concentrations with multiple regression and multilayer perceptron models10.2495/SDP-V11-N4-558-565 ↗
48. Evaluation of the meteorological forcing used for the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) air quality simulations10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.065 ↗
49. Air quality and climate connections10.1080/10962247.2015.1040526 ↗
50. Synoptic and meteorological drivers of extreme ozone concentrations over Europe10.1088/1748-9326/11/2/024005 ↗
51. A machine learning approach to quantify meteorological drivers of ozone pollution in China from 2015 to 201910.5194/acp-22-8385-2022 ↗
52. Chang, W., Chen, X., He, Z., and Zhou, S. (2023). A Prediction Hybrid Framework for Air Quality Integrated with W-BiLSTM(PSO)-GRU and XGBoost Methods. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su152216064 ↗
53. Antonio, D.L., Rosato, A., Colaiuda, V., Lombardi, A., Tomassetti, B., and Panella, M. (2019, January 17–20). Multivariate Prediction of PM10 Concentration by LSTM Neural Networks. Proceedings of the Photonics & Electromagnetics Research Symposium-Fall (PIERS-Fall), Xiamen, China.
54. Ko, K., Cho, S., and Rao, R.R. (2022). Machine-Learning-Based Near-Surface Ozone Forecasting Model with Planetary Boundary Layer Information. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22207864 ↗
55. Assessing the impact of oil and gas activities on ambient hydrocarbon concentrations in North Texas: A retrospective analysis from 2000 to 202210.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120907 ↗
56. Characterization and Source Apportionment of Ambient VOC Concentrations: Assessing Ozone Formation Potential in the Barnett Shale Oil and Gas Region10.1016/j.apr.2024.102327 ↗
57. Regional prediction of ground-level ozone using a hybrid sequence-to-sequence deep learning approach10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119841 ↗
58. Shah, I., Gul, N., Ali, S., and Houmani, H. (2024). Short-Term Hourly Ozone Concentration Forecasting Using Functional Data Approach. Econometrics, 12.10.3390/econometrics12020012 ↗
59. A novel approach to forecast urban surface-level ozone considering heterogeneous locations and limited information10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.013 ↗
60. Long Short-Term Memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
61. Learning to forget: Continual prediction with LSTM10.1162/089976600300015015 ↗
62. Rutkowski, L., Korytkowski, M., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L., and Zurada, J. (2017). LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks for Short Text and Sentiment Classification. Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing. ICAISC 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-59063-9 ↗
63. LSTM Fully Convolutional Networks for Time Series Classification10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2779939 ↗
64. Bidirectional LSTM with attention mechanism and convolutional layer for text classification10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.078 ↗
65. Shi, X., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Yeung, D.-Y., Wong, W., and Woo, W. (2015, January 7–12). Convolutional LSTM network: A machine learning approach for precipitation nowcasting. Proceedings of the 2015 Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2015), Montreal, QC, Canada. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:6352419.
66. Short-Term Residential Load Forecasting Based on LSTM Recurrent Neural Network10.1109/TSG.2017.2753802 ↗
67. Traffic flow prediction using LSTM with feature enhancement10.1016/j.neucom.2018.12.016 ↗
68. Cho, K., Van Merriënboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., and Bengio, Y. (2014). Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv.10.3115/v1/D14-1179 ↗
69. A novel hybrid model on the prediction of time series and its application for the gold price analysis and forecasting10.1016/j.physa.2019.121454 ↗
70. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean squared error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance10.3354/cr030079 ↗
71. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning, Springer. Available online: https://jqichina.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/the-elements-of-statistical-learning.pdf.10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 ↗
72. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. (2013). An Introduction to Statistical Learning, Springer. Available online: https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~rabbee/s154/ISLR_First_Printing.pdf.10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7 ↗
73. On the validation of models10.1080/02723646.1981.10642213 ↗
74. Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation10.1029/1998WR900018 ↗
75. Comparing Predictive Accuracy10.1198/073500102753410444 ↗
76. The Jackknife and the Bootstrap for General Stationary Observations
77. Spatio-temporal patterns of air pollution in China from 2015 to 2018 and implications for health risks10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113659 ↗
78. Spatial and temporal variations of six criteria air pollutants in 31 provincial capital cities in China during 2013–201410.1016/j.envint.2014.08.016 ↗
79. Effects of ozone, nitrogen deposition, and other stressors on montane ecosystems in the Sierra Nevada
80. Major air pollutants seasonal variation analysis and long-range transport of PM10 in an urban environment with specific climate condition in Transylvania (Romania)10.1007/s11356-020-09838-2 ↗
81. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
82. Diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease based on SHAP value feature selection10.1016/j.bbe.2022.06.007 ↗
83. Waspada, I., Bahtiar, N., Wirawan, P.W., and Awa, B.D.A. (2022). Performance analysis of isolation forest algorithm in fraud detection of credit card transactions. Khazanah Inform. J., 6.10.23917/khif.v6i2.10520 ↗
84. Wang, H., Hancock, J.T., and Khoshgoftaar, T.M. (2023, January 17–20). Improving medicare fraud detection through big data size reduction techniques. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented System Engineering (SOSE), Athens, Greece.10.1109/SOSE58276.2023.00032 ↗
85. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
86. Selection features and support vector machine for credit card risk identification10.1016/j.promfg.2020.05.012 ↗
87. A practical tutorial on bagging and boosting based ensembles for machine learning: Algorithms, software tools, performance study, practical perspectives and opportunities10.1016/j.inffus.2020.07.007 ↗
88. The stratospheric ozone layer—An overview10.1016/0269-7491(94)90024-8 ↗
89. U.S. EPA (2025, July 10). Clean Air Act. 40CFR50, Available online: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-50.
90. Liang, Y.C., Maimury, Y., Chen, A.H.L., and Juarez, J.R.C. (2020). Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Air Quality. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10249151 ↗
91. Air pollution prediction by using an artificial neural network model10.1007/s10098-019-01709-w ↗
92. Iskandaryan, D., Ramos, F., and Trilles, S. (2020). Air Quality Prediction in Smart Cities Using Machine Learning Technologies Based on Sensor Data: A Review. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10072401 ↗