Demand Assessment and Integration Feasibility Analysis for Advanced and Urban Air Mobility in Illinois
Source abstract
Abstract
Advanced and Urban Air Mobility (AAM and UAM) represent emerging transportation concepts that involve the use of novel aircraft technologies to transport passengers and cargo within urban, regional, and intra-regional environments. These systems may include Electric Vertical Take-off and Landing (eVTOL) aircraft, Short Take-off and Landing (STOL) aircraft, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which are being considered for a range of applications including passenger transport, cargo delivery, and other specialized operations. This study introduced a state-specific analytical framework that integrates different methodologies and data to enable a more precise evaluation of AAM viability in the State of Illinois, compared to generic national or global assessments, capturing the state’s unique mobility patterns, infrastructure constraints, and demographic distributions. One of the main goals is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the potential implications—both challenges and opportunities—associated with AAM and UAM operations. The analysis examines potential impacts on mobility, infrastructure, economic development, and public services, with particular emphasis on identifying key considerations for policy development. The research framework categorizes use cases into two broad types: AAM for the transportation of people and cargo, and AAM for functional applications such as emergency response, agriculture, and infrastructure monitoring. The study provides a detailed quantitative assessment of passenger air taxi services, including demand estimation, business model feasibility analysis, integration effects on existing transportation systems, and infrastructure requirements. For other AAM applications, the analysis identifies operational considerations, regulatory implications, and potential barriers to implementation, establishing a foundation for future detailed evaluation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Air Traffic Management and Optimization · Transportation and Mobility Innovations · Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Transportation Center, Northwestern University, 600 Foster Street, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
United Airlines, 233 S Wacker Dr, Chicago, IL 60606, USA
MITRE, 821 West Highway 50, Suite 201, St. Louis Region, O’Fallon, IL 62269, USA
Abraham Lincoln Capital Airport, Division of Aeronautics, Illinois Department of Transportation, 1 Langhorne Bond Drive, Springfield, IL 62707-8415, USA
Funding
Illinois Department of Transportation
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Goyal, R., Cohen, A., Serrao, J., Kimmel, S., Fernando, C., and Shaheen, S. (2018). Urban Air Mobility Market Study, Transportation Sustainability Research Center.
2. Bulusu, V., and Sengupta, R. (2020). Urban Air Mobility: Viability of Hub-Door and Door-Door Movement by Air, UC Berkeley, Institute of Transportation Studies. Volume Report No. UCB-ITS-WP-2020-02.
3. Factors Affecting Demand Consolidation in Urban Air Taxi Operation10.1177/03611981221098396 ↗
4. Mahmassani, H., Cummings, C., Volakakis, V., Audenaerd, L., and De La Paz, J. (2024). Advancing Air Mobility in Illinois, Illinois Center for Transportation.
5. Study of Emerging Air Taxi Network Operation Using Discrete-Event Systems Simulation Approach10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101857 ↗
6. Analysis of urban air mobility operational constraints10.2514/1.D0120 ↗
7. Alonso, J.J., Arneson, H.M., Melton, J.E., Vegh, M., Walker, C., and Young, L.A. (2017). System-of-Systems Considerations in the Notional Development of a Metropolitan Aerial Transportation System, Stanford University.
8. Holden, J., and Goel, N. (2016). Fast-Forwarding to a Future of On-Demand Urban Air Transportation, Uber Elevate.
9. Shaheen, S.A., Cohen, A., and Farrar, E.M. (2018). The Potential Societal Barriers of Urban Air Mobility (UAM).
10. Exploring Preferences for Transportation Modes in an Urban Air Mobility Environment: Munich Case Study10.1177/0361198119843858 ↗
11. Yedavalli, P., and Mooberry, J. (2018). An Assessment of Public Perception of Urban Air Mobility (UAM), Airbus.
12. Commuter Demand Estimation and Feasibility Assessment for Urban Air Mobility in Northern California10.1016/j.tra.2021.03.020 ↗
13. Garrow, L.A., Mokhtarian, P., German, B., and Boddupali, S. (2020, January 15–19). Commuting in the Age of the Jetsons: A Market Segmentation Analysis of Autonomous Ground Vehicles and Air Taxis in Five Large U.S. Cities. Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum, Virtually.10.2514/6.2020-3258 ↗
14. Goyal, R., Reiche, C., Fernando, C., and Cohen, A. (2021). Advanced Air Mobility: Demand Analysis and Market Potential of the Airport Shuttle and Air Taxi Markets. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13137421 ↗
15. Mayor, T., and Anderson, J. (2019). Getting Mobility Off the Ground, KPMG.
16. Rothfeld, R., Fu, M., Balać, M., and Antoniou, C. (2021). Potential Urban Air Mobility Travel Time Savings: An Exploratory Analysis of Munich, Paris, and San Francisco. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13042217 ↗
17. A Focus Group Study on the Potential of Autonomous Vehicles as a Viable Transportation Option: Perspectives from People with Disabilities and Public Transit Agencies10.1016/j.trf.2020.03.007 ↗
18. A Traffic Demand Analysis Method for Urban Air Mobility10.1109/TITS.2021.3052229 ↗
19. (2022, October 21). Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning on to 2050 Travel Demand Model Documentation, Available online: https://www.cmap.illinois.gov/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/FINAL-Travel-Demand-Model-Documentation-Appendix.pdf.
20. Bacchini, A., and Cestino, E. (2019). Electric VTOL Configurations Comparison. Aerospace, 6.10.3390/aerospace6030026 ↗
21. Factors Affecting the Adoption and Use of Urban Air Mobility10.1016/j.tra.2019.12.020 ↗
22. US Census Bureau (2022, November 08). Median Household Income in the United States, Available online: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA646N.
23. US Department of Transportation (2022, November 08). The Value of Travel Time Savings: Departmental Guidance for Conducting Economic Evaluations Revision 2 (2016 Update), Available online: https://www.transportation.gov/office-policy/transportation-policy/revised-departmental-guidance-valuation-travel-time-economic.
24. Comparing Urban Air Mobility Network Airspaces: Experiments and Insights
25. Measuring the Impact of Airspace Restrictions on Air Traffic Flow Using Four-Dimensional System Fundamental Diagrams for Urban Air Mobility10.1177/03611981221103237 ↗
26. Jardin, M. (2004, January 20–22). Air Traffic Conflict Models. Proceedings of the AIAA 4th Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations (ATIO) Forum, Chicago, IL, USA.10.2514/6.2004-6393 ↗
27. Tereschenko, I., Hanson, M., and Zou, B. (2020, January 15). Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram for Air Traffic: Preliminary Theoretic Results and Simulation Findings. Proceedings of the International Conference for Research in Air Transportation, Virtually.
28. Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams for Low-Altitude Air City Transport10.1016/j.trc.2023.104141 ↗
29. Federal Aviation Administration (2022, October 21). Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Traffic Management (UTM): Concept of Operations v1.0, Available online: https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/2018-utm-conops-v1-0-508.pdf?emrc=94dcbb.
30. Federal Aviation Administration (2022, October 21). Concept of Operations V1.0 Urban Air Mobility (UAM), Available online: https://nari.arc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/UAM_ConOps_v1.0.pdf.
31. Federal Aviation Administration (2023, May 19). Urban Air Mobility (UAM) Version 2.0 Concept of Operations. Released 26 April 2023, Available online: https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/Urban%20Air%20Mobility%20%28UAM%29%20Concept%20of%20Operations%202.0_0.pdf.
32. Federal Aviation Administration (2023, October 04). Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) Implementation Plan: Near-term (Innovate28) Focus with an Eye on the Future of AAM, Version 1.0, Available online: https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/AAM-I28-Implementation-Plan.pdf.
33. U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics (2024, September 12). T-100 Domestic Market and Segment Data [Data Set]. ArcGIS Online, Available online: https://geodata.bts.gov/datasets/usdot::t-100-domestic-market-and-segment-data/about.
34. Vascik, P.D., and Hansman, R.J. (2019, January 7–11). Development of vertiport capacity envelopes and analysis of their sensitivity to topological and operational factors. Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, San Diego, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2019-0526 ↗
35. Kohlman, L.W., and Patterson, M.D. (2018, January 25–29). System-level urban air mobility transportation modeling and determination of energy-related constraints. Proceedings of the 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA.10.2514/6.2018-3677 ↗
36. Syed, N., Rye, M., Ade, M., Trani, A., Hinze, N., Swingle, H., Smith, J., Marien, T., and Dollyhigh, S. (2017, January 5–9). Preliminary Considerations for ODM Air Traffic Management Based on Analysis of Commuter Passenger Demand and Travel Patterns for the Silicon Valley Region of California. Proceedings of the 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Denver, CL, USA.10.2514/6.2017-3082 ↗
37. Goodrich, K.H., and Barmore, B. (2018, January 25–29). Exploratory analysis of the airspace throughput and sensitivities of an urban air mo-bility system. Proceedings of the 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA.10.2514/6.2018-3364 ↗
38. Drones for parcel and passenger transportation: A literature review
39. Jiang, X., Tang, Y., Tang, Z., Cao, J., Bulusu, V., Poliziani, C., and Sengupta, R. (2023). Simulating the Integration of Urban Air Mobility into Existing Transportation Systems: A Survey. arXiv.10.2514/1.D0431 ↗
40. Flying Taxis Revived: Can Urban Air Mobility Reduce Road Congestion?10.1016/j.urbmob.2021.100002 ↗
41. Dynamic Assignment-Simulation Methodology for Multimodal Urban Transit Networks10.3141/2498-08 ↗
42. Mahmassani, H.S. (1998). Dynamic Traffic Simulation and Assignment: Models, Algorithms and Application to ATIS/ATMS Evaluation and Operation. Operations Research and Decision Aid Methodologies in Traffic and Transportation Management, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-662-03514-6_5 ↗
43. Vehicle Design and Optimization Model for Urban Air Mobility10.2514/1.C035756 ↗
44. Rimjha, M., and Trani, A. (2021, January 20–22). Urban air mobility: Factors affecting vertiport capacity. Proceedings of the 2021 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS), Virtual.10.1109/ICNS52807.2021.9441631 ↗
45. Induced travel demand: Research design, empirical evidence, and normative policies10.1177/088122017001001 ↗
46. Ahrenhold, N., Pohling, O., and Schier-Morgenthal, S. (2021). Impact of air taxis on air traffic in the vicinity of airports. Infrastructures, 6.10.3390/infrastructures6100140 ↗
47. Volakakis, V., and Mahmassani, H.S. (2025). Strategic Vertiport Placement for Airport Access: Utilizing Urban Air Mobility for Accelerated and Reliable Transportation. Infrastructures, 10.10.3390/infrastructures10090242 ↗