journal article·2025-11-03Open access

An Improved YOLO-Based Algorithm for Aquaculture Object Detection

Yunfan Fu, Wei Shi, Danwei Chen, Jianping Zhu, Chunfeng Lv

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 21

Abstract

Object detection technology plays a vital role in monitoring the growth status of aquaculture organisms and serves as a key enabler for the automated robotic capture of target species. Existing models for underwater biological detection often suffer from low accuracy and high model complexity. To address these limitations, we propose AOD-YOLO—an enhanced model based on YOLOv11s. The improvements are fourfold: First, the SPFE (Sobel and Pooling Feature Enhancement) module incorporates Sobel operators and pooling operations to effectively extract target edge information and global structural features, thereby strengthening feature representation. Second, the RGL (RepConv and Ghost Lightweight) module reduces redundancy in intermediate feature mappings of the convolutional neural network, decreasing parameter size and computational cost while further enhancing feature extraction capability through RepConv. Third, the MDCS (Multiple Dilated Convolution Sharing Module) module replaces the SPPF structure by integrating parameter-shared dilated convolutions, improving multi-scale target recognition. Finally, we upgrade the C2PSA module to C2PSA-M (Cascade Pyramid Spatial Attention—Mona) by integrating the Mona mechanism. This upgraded module introduces multi-cognitive filters to enhance visual signal processing and employs a distribution adaptation layer to optimize input information distribution. Experiments conducted on the URPC2020 and RUOD datasets demonstrate that AOD-YOLO achieves an accuracy of 86.6% on URPC2020, representing a 2.6% improvement over YOLOv11s, and 88.1% on RUOD, a 2.4% increase. Moreover, the model maintains relatively low complexity with only 8.73 M parameters and 21.4 GFLOPs computational cost. Experimental results show that our model achieves high accuracy for aquaculture targets while maintaining low complexity. This demonstrates its strong potential for reliable use in intelligent aquaculture monitoring systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Water Quality Monitoring Technologies · Advanced Neural Network Applications · IoT and Edge/Fog Computing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Engineering Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, No. 999, Huchenghuan Rd., Nanhui New City, Shanghai 201306, China

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Plant intelligence-based PILLO underwater target detection algorithm10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106818 ↗
2. A systematic review and analysis of deep learning-based underwater object detection10.1016/j.neucom.2023.01.056 ↗
3. Li, X., Zhao, Y., Su, H., Wang, Y., and Chen, G. (2025). Efficient underwater object detection based on feature enhancement and attention detection head. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-89421-2 ↗
4. Li, T., Gang, Y., Li, S., and Shang, Y. (2025). A small underwater object detection model with enhanced feature extraction and fusion. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-85961-9 ↗
5. Kumar, A., Berar, G., Sharma, M., Noonia, A., and Verma, G. (2025). Underwater image enhancement using hybrid transformers and evolutionary particle swarm optimization. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-14439-5 ↗
6. An Active Acoustic Track-Before-Detect Approach for Finding Underwater Mobile Targets10.1109/JSTSP.2019.2899237 ↗
7. Underwater image quality optimization: Researches, challenges, and future trends10.1016/j.imavis.2024.104995 ↗
8. Ding, J., Hu, J., Lin, J., and Zhang, X. (2024). Lightweight enhanced YOLOv8n underwater object detection network for low light environments. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-79211-7 ↗
9. Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., and Farhadi, A. (July, January 26). You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
10. Liu, W., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Szegedy, C., Reed, S., Fu, C.Y., and Berg, A.C. (2016, January 11–14). Ssd: Single shot multibox detector. Proceedings of the Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 ↗
11. Luo, Y., and Eljamal, O. (2025). SPyramidLightNet: A Lightweight Shared Pyramid Network for Efficient Underwater Debris Detection. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15179404 ↗
12. Xu, W., Fang, H., Yu, S., Yang, S., Yang, H., Xie, Y., and Dai, Y. (2024). RSNC-YOLO: A Deep-Learning-Based Method for Automatic Fine-Grained Tuna Recognition in Complex Environments. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142210732 ↗
13. A lightweight YOLOv8 integrating FasterNet for real-time underwater object detection10.1007/s11554-024-01431-x ↗
14. Qu, S., Cui, C., Duan, J., Lu, Y., and Pang, Z. (2024). Underwater small target detection under YOLOv8-LA model. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-66950-w ↗
15. An Improved Faster R-CNN for Small Object Detection10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2932731 ↗
16. A quantitative detection algorithm based on improved faster R-CNN for marine benthos10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101228 ↗
17. CEH-YOLO: A composite enhanced YOLO-based model for underwater object detection10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102758 ↗
18. Zhao, L., Yun, Q., Yuan, F., Ren, X., Jin, J., and Zhu, X. (2023). YOLOv7-CHS: An Emerging Model for Underwater Object Detection. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.3390/jmse11101949 ↗
19. SCoralDet: Efficient real-time underwater soft coral detection with YOLO10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102937 ↗
20. Gholamalinezhad, H., and Khosravi, H. (2020). Pooling methods in deep neural networks, a review. arXiv.
21. Ding, X., Zhang, X., Ma, N., Han, J., Ding, G., and Sun, J. (2021, January 20–25). Repvgg: Making vgg-style convnets great again. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Nashville, TN, USA.10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01352 ↗
22. Woo, S., Park, J., Lee, J.-Y., and Kweon, I.S. (2018, January 8–14). Cbam: Convolutional block attention module. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_1 ↗
23. Han, K., Wang, Y., Tian, Q., Guo, J., Xu, C., and Xu, C. (2020, January 13–19). Ghostnet: More features from cheap operations. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00165 ↗
24. Koh, P.W., Nguyen, T., Tang, Y.S., Mussmann, S., Pierson, E., Kim, B., and Liang, P. (2020, January 13–18). Concept bottleneck models. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Online.
25. Theory of deep convolutional neural networks: Downsampling10.1016/j.neunet.2020.01.018 ↗
26. Liu, H., Liu, F., Fan, X., and Huang, D. (2021). Polarized self-attention: Towards high-quality pixel-wise regression. arXiv.10.1016/j.neucom.2022.07.054 ↗
27. Yin, D., Hu, L., Li, B., Zhang, Y., and Yang, X. (2025, January 11–15). 5%> 100%: Breaking performance shackles of full fine-tuning on visual recognition tasks. Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, Nashville, TN, USA.10.1109/CVPR52734.2025.01869 ↗
28. Tian, Y., Ye, Q., and Doermann, D. (2025). Yolov12: Attention-centric real-time object detectors. arXiv.
29. Improved lightweight underwater target detection algorithm for YOLOv7
30. Research on FDC-YOLO v8 Underwater Biological Object Detection Method Improved by Deformable Convolution
31. Marine life identification method based on improved RT-DETR