journal article·2025-10-15Open access

The Influence of Information Redundancy on Driving Behavior and Psychological Responses Under Different Fog and Risk Conditions: An Analysis of AR-HUD Interface Designs

Junfeng Li, Kexin Chen, Mo Chen

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 20

Abstract

Adverse road conditions, particularly foggy weather, significantly impair drivers’ abilities to gather information and make judgments in response to unexpected events. To investigate the impact of different Augmented Reality-Head-Up Display (AR-HUD) interfaces (words-only, symbols-only, and words + symbols) on driving behavior, this study simulated driving scenarios under varying visibility and risk levels in foggy conditions, measuring reaction time (RT), time-to-collision (TTC), the maximum lateral acceleration, the maximum longitudinal acceleration, and subjective data. The results indicated that risk levels significantly affected drivers’ RT, TTC, and maximum longitudinal and lateral accelerations. The three interfaces significantly differed in RT and TTC across different risk levels in heavy fog. In light fog, words-only and redundant interfaces significantly affected RT across different risk levels; words-only and symbols-only interfaces significantly affected TTC across different risk levels. In addition, participants responded faster when using text-related interfaces in the subject’s native language. After analyzing data on perceived usability across the three interfaces, the results indicated that under high-risk conditions, both in light fog and heavy fog, participants rated the redundant interface as having higher usability and preferred the redundant interfaces. Based on these findings, this paper proposes the following design strategies for AR-HUD visual interfaces: (1) Under low-risk foggy driving conditions, all three interface types are effective and applicable. (2) Under high-risk foggy driving conditions, redundant interface design is recommended. Although it may not significantly improve driving performance, this interface type was subjectively perceived as more useful and preferred by the subjects. The findings of this study provide support for design of AR-HUD interfaces, contributing to enhanced driving safety and human–machine interaction experience under complex meteorological conditions. This offers practical implications for the development and optimization of intelligent vehicle systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Human-Automation Interaction and Safety · Traffic and Road Safety · Safety Warnings and Signage

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Art and Design, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China

Funding

general Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research in Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. A study of the compliance level of connected vehicle warning information in a fog warning system based on a driving simulation10.1016/j.trf.2020.11.012 ↗
2. A Novel Cooperation-Guided Warning of Invisible Danger from AR-HUD to Enhance Driver’s Perception10.1080/10447318.2023.2233734 ↗
3. George, P., Thouvenin, I., Fremont, V., and Cherfaoui, V. (2012, January 3–7). Daaria: Driver assistance by augmented reality for intelligent automobile. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Alcala de Henares, Spain.10.1109/IVS.2012.6232220 ↗
4. Effects of Augmented-Reality Head-up Display System Use on Risk Perception and Psychological Changes of Drivers
5. The influence of cognition and age on accommodation, detection rate and response times when using a car head-up display (HUD)10.1046/j.1475-1313.1998.00350.x ↗
6. Using technology to facilitate the design and delivery of warnings10.1080/00207720210133651 ↗
7. Personalization of warning signs: The role of perceived relevance on behavioral compliance10.1016/0169-8141(94)90099-X ↗
8. Behavioural compliance to voice and print warnings10.1080/00140139108967290 ↗
9. Wickens, C.D., and Prinett, J.G. (2000). Engineering Psychology, Prentice Hall. [3rd ed.].
10. The effects of redundancy in user-interface design on older users10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.102385 ↗
11. Gabbard Joseph, L., Smith, M., Tanous, K., Kim, H., and Jonas, B. (2019). AR DriveSim: An Immersive Driving Simulator for Augmented Reality Head-Up Display Research. Front. Robot. AI, 6.10.3389/frobt.2019.00098 ↗
12. Analyzing Drivers’ Attitude towards HUD System Using a Stated Preference Survey10.1155/2014/380647 ↗
13. Assessing Distraction Potential of Augmented Reality Head-Up Displays for Vehicle Drivers10.1177/0018720819844845 ↗
14. Ahmed, M.M., Yang, G., and Gaweesh, S. (2020). Assessment of Drivers’ Perceptions of Connected Vehicle-Human Machine Interface for Driving Under Adverse Weather Conditions: Preliminary Findings from Wyoming. Front. Psychol., 11.10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01889 ↗
15. The impact of different AR-HUD virtual warning interfaces on the takeover performance and visual characteristics of autonomous vehicles10.1080/15389588.2022.2055752 ↗
16. Effectiveness of Augmented Reality Warnings on Driving Behavior Whilst Approaching Pedestrian Crossings: A Driving Simulator Study10.1016/j.aap.2020.105760 ↗
17. Personality and temperament traits as predictors of conscious risky car driving10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105361 ↗
18. Multi-vehicle interaction safety of connected automated vehicles in merging area: A real-time risk assessment approach10.1016/j.aap.2021.106546 ↗
19. How risky is distracted driving?10.1007/s11166-023-09405-3 ↗
20. Driving under the influence of distraction: Examining dissociations between risk perception and engagement in distracted driving10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.003 ↗
21. Driver’s distracted behavior: The contribution of compensatory beliefs increases with higher perceived risk10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103009 ↗
22. Driving fingerprinting enhances drowsy driving detection: Tailoring to individual driver characteristics10.1016/j.aap.2024.107812 ↗
23. Young drivers and the risk for drowsy driving10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2456 ↗
24. A Clustering Approach to Identify High-Risk Taxi Drivers Based on Self-Reported Driving Behavior10.1155/2022/6511225 ↗
25. Analysis of speed reductions and crash risk of aggressive drivers during emergent pre-crash scenarios at unsignalized intersections10.1016/j.aap.2023.107088 ↗
26. Alcohol Biomarkers as Tools to Guide and Support Decisions About Intoxicated Driver Risk10.1080/15389580903163269 ↗
27. Hazards Faced by Young Designated Drivers: In-Car Risks of Driving Drunken Passengers10.3390/ijerph6061760 ↗
28. Australian daily cannabis users’ use of police avoidance strategies and compensatory behaviours to manage the risks of drug driving10.1111/dar.13705 ↗
29. A freeway vehicle early warning method based on risk map: Enhancing traffic safety through global perspective characterization of driving risk10.1016/j.aap.2024.107611 ↗
30. Spatial risk modelling of behavioural hotspots: Risk-aware path planning for autonomous vehicles10.1016/j.tra.2020.01.024 ↗
31. Modeling Lane-Change Risk in Urban Expressway Off-Ramp Area Based on Naturalistic Driving Data
32. Longitudinal safety evaluation of connected vehicles’ platooning on expressways10.1016/j.aap.2017.12.012 ↗
33. Assessing rear-end collision risk of cars and heavy vehicles on freeways using a surrogate safety measure10.1016/j.aap.2018.01.033 ↗
34. Passing distance, speed and perceived risks to the cyclist and driver in passing events10.1016/j.jsr.2023.09.007 ↗
35. The effect of gender, occupation and experience on behavior while driving on a freeway deceleration lane based on field operational test data10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.034 ↗
36. The effect of speed reductions on collisions: A controlled before-and-after study in Quebec, Canada10.1016/j.jth.2021.101137 ↗
37. Using virtual reality to study the effect of information redundancy on evacuation effectiveness10.1002/hfm.20982 ↗
38. Cooper, A., Reimann, R., Cronin, D., and Noessel, C. (2014). About Face: The Essentials of Interaction Design, John Wiley & Sons. [4th ed.].
39. Shneiderman, B. (2009). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Compuer Interaction, Addison-Wesley. [5th ed.].
40. The use of icons and labels in an end user application program: An empirical study of learning and retention10.1080/014492999119129 ↗
41. Digital, analogue, or redundant speedometers for truck driving: Impact on visual distraction, efficiency and usability10.1016/j.apergo.2017.05.013 ↗
42. Design of head-up display interfaces for automated vehicles10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103060 ↗
43. An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale10.1080/10447310802205776 ↗
44. Design of Diverging Stacked Bar Charts for Likert Scales and Other Applications
45. Unraveling the impact of fog on driver behavior in highway tunnel entrances: A field experiment10.1080/15389588.2024.2319333 ↗
46. Novice Drivers’ Risky Driving Behavior, Risk Perception, and Crash Risk: Findings from the DRIVE Study10.2105/AJPH.2008.150367 ↗
47. Reddy, G.R., Blackler, A., and Popovic, V. (2019). Intuitive Interaction: Adaptable Interface Framework for Intuitively Learnable Product Interfaces for People with Diverse Capabilities, CRC Press.10.1201/b22191-6 ↗
48. Using Glance Behaviour to Inform the Design of Adaptive HMI for Partially Automated Vehicles10.1109/TITS.2021.3086882 ↗