journal article·2025-10-15Open access

Comparative Analysis and Validation of LSTM and GRU Models for Predicting Annual Mean Sea Level in the East Sea: A Case Study of Ulleungdo Island

Tae-Yun Kim, Hong-Sik Yun, Hyung-Mi Yoon, Seung-Jun Lee

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 20

Abstract

This study presents a deep learning-based model for predicting annual mean sea level (MSL) in the East Sea, with a focus on the Ulleungdo Island region, which maintains an independent vertical datum. To account for long-term tidal variability, the model enables continuous estimation of hourly and annual MSL values. Two recurrent neural network (RNN) architectures—Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU)—were constructed and compared. Observational tide gauge data from 1 January 2000 to 3 August 2018 (covering 18.6 years and a full tidal nodal cycle) were preprocessed through missing-value and outlier treatment, followed by min–max normalization, and then structured for sequential learning. Comparative analysis demonstrated that the GRU model slightly outperformed the LSTM model in predictive accuracy and training stability. As a result, the GRU model was selected to produce annual MSL forecasts for the period 2018–2021. The GRU achieved a mean RMSE of approximately 0.44 cm during this prediction period, indicating robust performance in forecasting hourly sea level variations. The findings highlight the potential of deep learning methods to support vertical datum determination in island regions and to provide reliable sea level estimates for integration into coastal and oceanographic modeling. The proposed approach offers a scalable framework for long-term sea level prediction under evolving geodetic conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Marine and Coastal Research · Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Geodesy Laboratory, Civil & Architectural and Environmental System Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea

Disaster & Risk Management Laboratory, Interdisciplinary Program in Crisis & Disaster and Risk Management, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea

Funding

Ministry of Education · National Research Foundation of Korea

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Raj, N., and Brown, J. (2023). Prediction of Mean Sea Level with GNSS-VLM Correction Using a Hybrid Deep Learning Model in Australia. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15112881 ↗
2. Raj, N. (2022). Prediction of Sea Level with Vertical Land Movement Correction Using Deep Learning. Mathematics, 10.10.3390/math10234533 ↗
3. HIDRA3: A Deep-Learning Model for Multipoint Ensemble Sea Level Forecasting in the Presence of Tide Gauge Sensor Failures10.5194/gmd-18-605-2025 ↗
4. Predicting Future Global Sea Level Rise From Climate Change Variables Using Deep Learning10.12785/ijcds/130166 ↗
5. Sea Surface Height Prediction With Deep Learning Based on Attention Mechanism
6. Application of Deep Learning Technique to the Sea Surface Height Prediction in the South China Sea10.1007/s13131-021-1735-0 ↗
7. Predicting Sea Level Rise Using Artificial Intelligence: A Review10.1007/s11831-023-09934-9 ↗
8. Artificial Neural Network-Based Model Predictive Control Using Correlated Data10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04339 ↗
9. A Hybrid Neural Network Approach for Adaptive Scenario-Based Model Predictive Control in the LPV Framework10.1109/LCSYS.2023.3283493 ↗
10. Abaza, B.F., and Gheorghita, V. (2025). Artificial Neural Network Framework for Hybrid Control and Monitoring in Turning Operations. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15073499 ↗
11. Development of an Adaptive Artificial Neural Network Model and Optimal Control Algorithm for a Data Center Cyber–Physical System10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108704 ↗
12. Model Predictive Control Using Artificial Neural Network for Power Converters10.1109/TIE.2021.3076721 ↗
13. Lipton, Z.C., Berkowitz, J., and Elkan, C. (2015). A Critical Review of Recurrent Neural Networks for Sequence Learning. arXiv.
14. Prakash, K.B., and Kanagachidambaresan, G.R. (2021). Recurrent Neural Network. Programming with TensorFlow, Springer International Publishing. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing.10.1007/978-3-030-57077-4 ↗
15. Recurrent Neural Networks for Sequential Processing10.1007/978-981-13-0062-2_2 ↗
16. Donkers, T., Loepp, B., and Ziegler, J. (2017, January 27). Sequential User-Based Recurrent Neural Network Recommendations. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Como, Italy.10.1145/3109859.3109877 ↗
17. A Review of Recurrent Neural Networks: LSTM Cells and Network Architectures10.1162/neco_a_01199 ↗
18. A Review on the Long Short-Term Memory Model10.1007/s10462-020-09838-1 ↗
19. A Survey on Long Short-Term Memory Networks for Time Series Prediction10.1016/j.procir.2021.03.088 ↗
20. Long Short-Term Memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
21. Dumre, P., Bhattarai, S., and Shashikala, H.K. (2024, January 13). Optimizing Linear Regression Models: A Comparative Study of Error Metrics. Proceedings of the 2024 4th International Conference on Technological Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICTACS), Tashkent, Uzbekistan.10.1109/ICTACS62700.2024.10840719 ↗
22. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) or Mean Absolute Error (MAE)?—Arguments against Avoiding RMSE in the Literature10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014 ↗
23. Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) or Mean Absolute Error (MAE): When to Use Them or Not10.5194/gmd-15-5481-2022 ↗
24. A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Student Performance: Evaluating the Impact of Stacking and Traditional Methods10.47709/brilliance.v4i2.4669 ↗
25. Enhanced Prediction of Metamaterial Antenna Parameters Using Advanced Machine Learning Regression Models10.2528/PIERC24060901 ↗
26. Deep Learning for Multi-Year ENSO Forecasts10.1038/s41586-019-1559-7 ↗
27. A Self-Attention–Based Neural Network for Three-Dimensional Multivariate Modeling and Its Skillful ENSO Predictions10.1126/sciadv.adf2827 ↗
28. Incorporating Heat Budget Dynamics in a Transformer-Based Deep Learning Model for Skillful ENSO Prediction10.1038/s41612-024-00741-y ↗
29. The Role of Sea Surface Salinity in ENSO Forecasting in the 21st Century10.1038/s41612-024-00763-6 ↗
30. ENSO Analysis and Prediction Using Deep Learning: A Review10.1016/j.neucom.2022.11.078 ↗
31. CNN-Based ENSO Forecasts With a Focus on SSTA Zonal Pattern and Physical Interpretation10.1029/2023GL105175 ↗
32. Palanisamy Vadivel, S.K., Kim, D., Jung, J., Cho, Y.-K., and Han, K.-J. (2020). Monitoring the Vertical Land Motion of Tide Gauges and Its Impact on Relative Sea Level Changes in Korean Peninsula Using Sequential SBAS-InSAR Time-Series Analysis. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13010018 ↗
33. Palanisamy Vadivel, S.K., Kim, D., Jung, J., and Cho, Y.-K. (2020, January 4–8). Multi-Temporal Spaceborne InSAR Technique to Compensate Vertical Land Motion in Sea Level Change Records: A Case Study of Tide Gauges in Korean Peninsula. Proceedings of the 22nd EGU General Assembly, Online.10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-12838 ↗