journal article·2025-10-10Open access

A Unified Modelling Framework Combining FTA, RBD, and BowTie for Reliability Improvement

Mohamad Afiq Amiruddin Parnon, Kassandra A. Papadopoulou, Jyoti K. Sinha

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 20

Abstract

Ensuring reliability and safety is essential in complex energy systems such as wind turbines, where failures can trigger unexpected downtimes, severe incidents, and significant costs. This study proposes a hybrid BowTie-based reliability framework that integrates Fault Tree Analysis, Reliability Block Diagrams, and BowTie methodology to quantify risk and evaluate the effectiveness of safety barriers. The framework employs key reliability metrics including availability, probability of failure on demand, and probability of failure per hour, and supports scenario-based sensitivity analyses to explore redesign options. A simulation-based case study of a wind turbine generator subsystem is presented, using parameter values drawn from published reliability data. Results highlight that protective relays and automatic trip systems represent critical single points of defence, while improvements such as enhanced oil analysis and redundant dashboards reduce consequence frequency from 2.912 × 10−17 to 8.257 × 10−19 failures/h (a 97.16% reduction, nearly two orders of magnitude). Compared to conventional models, the proposed framework introduces explicit defence in depth modelling, improves computational compactness, and provides a practical decision support tool for asset managers by balancing safety and reliability. At this stage, the study should be regarded as a proof of concept that demonstrates feasibility and sets a foundation for future research and application to larger, more complex infrastructures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Software Reliability and Analysis Research · Reliability and Maintenance Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

Jabatan Teknologi Kejuruteraan Mekanikal, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Hang Tuah Jaya, Durian Tunggal 76100, Malaysia

Alliance Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. An overview of fault tree analysis and its application in model based dependability analysis10.1016/j.eswa.2017.01.058 ↗
2. Formal reliability analysis of oil and gas pipelines
3. Dynamic fault trees resolution: A conscious trade-off between analytical and simulative approaches10.1016/j.ress.2011.06.014 ↗
4. A hybrid approach for an oil and gas company as a representative of a high reliability organization10.1080/09617353.2021.1920299 ↗
5. A hybrid modular approach for dynamic fault tree analysis10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2996643 ↗
6. Milling fault detection method based on fault tree analysis and hierarchical belief rule base10.32604/csse.2023.037330 ↗
7. Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network10.1016/j.psep.2012.01.005 ↗
8. Towards an improved bowtie method for quantifying industrial risks
9. A novel dynamic risk assessment method for the petrochemical industry using bow-tie analysis and Bayesian network analysis method based on the methodological framework of ARAMIS project10.1016/j.ress.2023.109397 ↗
10. A new risk assessment method based on belief rule base and fault tree analysis
11. International Electrotechnical Commission (2006). IEC 61025: Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), IEC.
12. CCPS, and Energy Institute (2018). Bow Ties in Risk Management, Wiley.10.1002/9781119490357 ↗
13. Ozturk, S. (2019). Forecasting Wind Turbine Failures and Associated Costs. [Master’s Thesis, Columbia University].
14. A unified framework for asset ranking based on their criticality through case studies10.1108/IJQRM-01-2025-0038 ↗
15. Pulikollu, R.V., Dykes, K., Guo, Y., Sethuraman, L., Parsons, T., King, R.N., Sethuraman, L., and Veers, P. (2023). Wind Turbine Generator Reliability Analysis to Reduce Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Costs, Sandia National Laboratories. Sandia National Laboratories Report.10.2172/1992825 ↗
16. Evaluating wind turbine power plant reliability through fault tree analysis10.18485/aeletters.2023.8.4.5 ↗
17. Identification of critical components of wind turbines using FTA over the time10.1016/j.renene.2015.09.038 ↗
18. Fault tree analysis of floating offshore wind turbines10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.097 ↗
19. Einarsson, S. (2016). Wind Turbine Reliability Modeling. [Master’s Thesis, Reykjavík University].
20. Linsday, J., Briand, D., Hill, R., Stinebaugh, J., and Benjamin, A. (2008). Wind Turbine Reliability: A Database and Analysis Approach, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.10.2172/1028916 ↗
21. Swain, A.D., and Guttmann, H.E. (1983). Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications (NUREG/CR-1278).10.2172/5752058 ↗
22. May, A., and McMillan, D. (October, January 29). Condition based maintenance for offshore wind turbines: The effects of false alarms from condition monitoring systems. Proceedings of the ESREL 2013—Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis: Beyond the Horizon, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.10.1201/b15938-118 ↗
23. Pepperl+Fuchs GmbH (2010). Safety Manual SIL KFD0-RSH-1.4S.PS Relay Module, Pepperl+Fuchs.
24. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) (2025, September 11). Gearbox reliability database (GRD) statistics, Available online: https://grd.nrel.gov/stats.
25. NSK Ltd. (2018). Advanced Bearing Solutions for the Wind Industry, NSK Ltd.
26. Brewer, R., Pelkey, A., and Miller, A. (2018). Limitations of Offline Oil Analysis for Determining Gearbox Health, Poseidon Systems. Technical Report.
27. Nogueira, W.F., de Andrade, M.A.H., and de Souza, G.F.M. (2025). Wind turbine fault detection through autoencoder-based neural network and FMSA. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25144499 ↗
28. Precision Electric (2025). Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs)–Comprehensive Technical Overview, Precision Electric. Technical Report.
29. Kumar, R.R., Waisale, L.O., Tamata, J.L., Tortella, A., Kia, S.H., and Andriollo, M. (2024). Advanced fault detection and severity analysis of broken rotor bars in induction motors: Comparative classification and feature study using dimensionality reduction techniques. Machines, 12.10.3390/machines12120890 ↗
30. Gertman, D.I., Blackman, H.S., Marble, J.L., Byers, J.C., and Smith, C.L. (2005). The SPAR-H Human Reliability Analysis Method (NUREG/CR-6883, INL/EXT-05-00509).
31. Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) (2024). 2023 Protection Systems Performance Report, WECC.
32. Liebusch, F. (2020). Relays in Safety-Related Control Systems, TE Connectivity. White Paper.
33. Generowicz, M., and Martin, R. (2025, September 11). Introduction to the MoonSIF Spreadsheet Workbook: Failure Probability Model. I&E Systems Pty Ltd., Nov. 2023. Available online: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode.
34. Effect of metallic substrate and rubber elastic materials over passive constrained layer damping on tool vibration during boring process10.1177/14613484241238933 ↗
35. U.S. Department of Defense (1991). MIL-HDBK-217F: Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment.
36. Make Bow-Tie Dynamic by Rethinking It as a Hierarchical Bayesian Network: Dynamic Risk Assessment of an LNG Bunkering Operation
37. Dynamic-Risk-Informed Safety Barrier Management: An Application to Cost-Effective Barrier Optimization Based on Data from Multiple Sources10.1016/j.jlp.2023.105034 ↗
38. On Risk-Based Maintenance: A Comprehensive Review of Three Approaches to Track the Impact of Consequence Modelling for Predicting Maintenance Actions10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104555 ↗
39. Hosseinnia Davatgar, B., Paltrinieri, N., and Bubbico, R. (2021). Safety barrier management: Risk-based approach for the oil and gas sector. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 9.10.3390/jmse9070722 ↗
40. A reliability centred maintenance-oriented framework for modelling, evaluating, and optimising complex repairable flow networks10.1007/s40747-025-01787-y ↗
41. Improving the foundation and practice of reliability engineering
42. Yang, D., Xing, K., Pan, L., Lu, N., and Yu, J. (2025). Sustainable risk management framework for petroleum storage facilities: Integrating bow-tie analysis and dynamic Bayesian networks. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17062642 ↗