From BIM to UAVs: A Systematic Review of Digital Solutions for Productivity Challenges in Construction
Source abstract
Abstract
The construction industry faces persistent productivity challenges despite the widespread adoption of advanced digital technologies. This systematic review examines how digital technologies contribute to improving on-site labor productivity within the Architecture, Engineering, Construction, and Operations (AECOs) sector. Following the PRISMA methodology, 431 records were initially identified, with 28 high-quality articles ultimately selected for analysis through rigorous screening and snowballing techniques. The reviewed technologies include Building Information Modeling (BIM), photogrammetry, LiDAR, augmented reality (AR), global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs), radio frequency identification (RFID), and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which were categorized into three key areas: factors affecting productivity, modeling and evaluation, and productivity improvement methods. Findings highlight that these technologies collectively enhance resource allocation, reduce labor costs, and improve project scheduling through better coordination. Whilst digital technologies demonstrate substantial impact on construction productivity, further research is needed to quantify long-term benefits and address scalability challenges across different project contexts and organizational structures. Ultimately, the review concludes that digital technologies play a crucial role in enhancing construction productivity, highlighting the need for further research to assess long-term advantages and scalability across diverse construction environments. These technological advancements are essential for modernizing the industry and supporting sustainable growth in the digital transition era.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: BIM and Construction Integration · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CONSTRUCT/GEQUALTEC, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, St. Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
Civil Construction School, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile
Funding
CONSTRUCT-Instituto de I&D em Estruturas e Construções · Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
References (85)
Show source-provided references
1. Calvetti, D., Mêda, P., Gonçalves, M.C., and Sousa, H. (2020). Worker 4.0: The Future of Sensored Construction Sites. Buildings, 10.10.3390/buildings10100169 ↗
2. Competitiveness in the construction industry: A contractor’s perspective on barriers to improving the construction industry performance
3. Barbosa, F., Woetzel, J., Mischke, J., Ribeirinho, M.J., Sridhar, M., Parsons, M., Bertram, N., and Brown, S. (2024, November 24). Reinventing Construction Through a Productivity Revolution. McKinsey Global Institute. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/operations/our%20insights/reinventing%20construction%20through%20a%20productivity%20revolution/mgi-reinventing-construction-a-route-to-higher-productivity-full-report.pdf.
4. Benefits and Barriers of Construction Project Monitoring using Hi-Resolution Automated Cameras10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000164 ↗
5. Onsite 3D marking for construction activity tracking10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.027 ↗
6. Model to predict the impact of a technology on construction productivity10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000328 ↗
7. Automated recognition of 3D CAD model objects in laser scans and calculation of as-built dimensions for dimensional compliance control in construction10.1016/j.aei.2009.08.006 ↗
8. Visualization of construction progress monitoring with 4D simulation model overlaid on time-lapse photographs10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2009)23:6(391) ↗
9. Research in automated measurement of project performance indicators10.1016/j.autcon.2006.03.003 ↗
10. Digital image reasoning for tracking excavation activities10.1016/j.autcon.2007.10.008 ↗
11. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis
12. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
13. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Statement10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 ↗
14. Liberati, A., Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P.C., Ioannidis, J.P., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P.J., Kleijnen, J., and Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. PLoS Med., 6.10.2427/5768 ↗
15. 4D point cloud-based spatial-temporal semantic registration for monitoring mobile crane construction activities10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105576 ↗
16. Multicamera vision-based productivity monitoring of earthmoving operations10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103121 ↗
17. A vision-based approach for automatic progress tracking of floor paneling in offsite construction facilities10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103620 ↗
18. Productivity improvement of precast shop drawings generation through BIM-based process re-engineering10.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.014 ↗
19. Assessing research in automated project performance control (APPC)10.1016/j.autcon.2006.08.001 ↗
20. An object recognition, tracking, and contextual reasoning-based video interpretation method for rapid productivity analysis of construction operations10.1016/j.autcon.2011.05.005 ↗
21. Measuring the impact of BIM on labor productivity in a small specialty contracting enterprise through action-research10.1016/j.autcon.2015.07.002 ↗
22. BIM-assisted labor productivity measurement method for structural formwork10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.009 ↗
23. Factors Affecting Construction Labor Productivity in Kuwait10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000501 ↗
24. Action-Response Model and Loss of Productivity in Construction10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:1(47) ↗
25. Modeling Construction Labor Productivity10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:4(705) ↗
26. Work Sampling Can Predict Unit Rate Productivity10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1986)112:1(90) ↗
27. Determinants of construction labour productivity in Oman
28. Factors affecting construction labour productivity: A case study of Jordan
29. Wong, J.H., Rashidi, A., and Arashpour, M. (2020). Evaluating the Impact of Building Information Modeling on the Labor Productivity of Construction Projects in Malaysia. Buildings, 10.10.3390/buildings10040066 ↗
30. Ratajczak, J. (2019). BIM-based and AR Application Combined with Location-Based Management System for the Improvement of the Construction Performance. Buildings, 9.10.3390/buildings9050118 ↗
31. Molaei, A., Kolu, A., Haaraniemi, N., and Geimer, M. (2023). Automatic Estimation of Excavator’s Actual Productivity in Trenching and Grading Operations Using Building Information Modeling (BIM). Actuators, 12.10.3390/act12110423 ↗
32. Efficiency Analysis of Construction Automation Using 3D Geospatial Information
33. A Real-Time Productivity Tracking Framework Using Survey-Cloud-BIM Integration10.1007/s13369-020-04844-5 ↗
34. Improving tower crane productivity using wireless technology10.1111/j.1467-8667.2006.00459.x ↗
35. Critical Review of Labor Productivity Research in Construction Journals
36. Construction performance monitoring via still images, time-lapse photos, and video streams: Now, tomorrow, and the future10.1016/j.aei.2015.01.011 ↗
37. Pathways for the improvement of construction productivity: A perspective on the adoption of advanced techniques
38. Mandanayake, U., and Çıdık, M. (2019, January 2–4). The potential of digital technology to improve construction productivity. Proceedings of the 35th Annual ARCOM Conference, Leeds, UK.
39. Measuring productivity in the construction industry10.1080/09613210600590041 ↗
40. Construction productivity: Issues encountered by contractors in Singapore10.1016/0263-7863(95)95704-H ↗
41. Factors Influencing Construction Labour Productivity: An Indian Case Study
42. Construction Productivity Improvement: A Study of Human, Management and External Issues
43. Industry 4.010.1007/s12599-014-0334-4 ↗
44. Models for digitalization10.1007/s10270-015-0494-9 ↗
45. Brandon, P.S., and Lu, S.L. (2008). Clients Driving Innovation, Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444301342 ↗
46. The impact of emerging information technology on project management for construction10.1016/j.autcon.2009.11.004 ↗
47. BIM for facilities management: Evaluating BIM standards in asset register creation and service life planning
48. Evolution of the i-Booth© onsite information management kiosk10.1016/j.autcon.2011.05.012 ↗
49. Automated progress control using laser scanning technology10.1016/j.autcon.2013.08.012 ↗
50. Barriers to implementation of building information modeling (BIM) to the construction industry10.32732/jcec.2018.7.2.107 ↗
51. Return on investment analysis of using building information modeling in construction10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000164 ↗
52. An overview of BIM adoption in the construction industry
53. JOUAV (2025, September 25). How Much Does a Drone Cost in 2025?. Available online: https://www.jouav.com/blog/how-much-does-a-drone-cost.html.
54. Utilizing drone technology in the civil engineering
55. Implementation of technologies in the construction industry: A systematic review10.1108/ECAM-02-2021-0172 ↗
56. Mobile augmented reality applications for construction projects10.1108/CI-02-2017-0013 ↗
57. Bench-Mark (2025, September 25). How RTK Is Transforming the Construction Industry. Available online: https://bench-mark.ca/how-rtk-is-transforming-the-construction-industry/.
58. Point One Nav (2025, September 25). Build Your Own RTK Base Station?. Available online: https://pointonenav.com/news/is-build-your-own-rtk-really-worth-it/.
59. Evolution of RFID applications in construction: A literature review10.3390/s150715988 ↗
60. Integration of passive RFID for small-scale construction material tracking and management
61. The application of active radio frequency identification technology for tool tracking on construction job sites10.1016/j.autcon.2005.06.004 ↗
62. Superior Instrument (2025, September 25). UAVs for Surveying & Mapping—Construction Drones. Available online: https://www.superiorinstrument.com/UAV-s/4169.htm.
63. The Drone, U. (2025, September 25). Drone Surveying Guide: Why UAV Surveying Is the Future?. Available online: https://www.thedroneu.com/blog/drone-surveying/.
64. Guidelines for applied machine learning in construction industry—A case of profit margins estimation
65. Coherent Solutions (2025, September 25). AI Development Cost Estimation: Pricing Structure, ROI. Available online: https://www.coherentsolutions.com/insights/ai-development-cost-estimation-pricing-structure-roi.
66. Predicting Industrial Construction Labor Productivity Using Fuzzy Expert Systems10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:8(938) ↗
67. Artificial neural networks model for predicting excavator productivity10.1108/eb021238 ↗
68. Research of factors influencing construction productivity10.1080/01446199000000005 ↗
69. Building information modeling for sustainable design and LEED (R) rating analysis10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.019 ↗
70. Explorative analysis of vehicular movement patterns using RFID-based transport data: An eulerian perspective
71. Applications of multirotor drone technologies in construction management
72. National Institute of Building Science (2007). National Building Information Modeling Standard, Version 1.0, Part 1—Overview, Principles and Methodologies, National Institute of Building Science. [1st ed.].
73. Eastman, C.M., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., and Liston, K. (2011). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors, Wiley. [2nd ed.].
74. The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM)10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.001 ↗
75. Benefits and lessons learned of implementing Building Virtual Design and Construction (VDC) technologies for coordination of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing (MEP) systems on a large Healthcare project
76. Impact of three-dimensional parametric modeling of buildings on productivity in structural engineering practice10.1016/j.autcon.2007.08.003 ↗
77. Coates, P., Arayici, Y., Koskela, K., Kagioglou, M., Usher, C., and O’Reilly, K. (2024, December 08). The Key Performance Indicators of the BIM Implementation Process. Available online: https://scispace.com/pdf/the-key-performance-indicators-of-the-bim-implementation-21wednumzi.pdf.
78. Automated Monitoring of Operation-level Construction Progress Using 4D BIM and Daily Site Photologs
79. PHOTO-NET II: A computer-based monitoring system applied to project management10.1016/S0926-5805(03)00042-6 ↗
80. A BIM-Based Study on the Comprehensive Benefit Analysis for Prefabricated Building Projects in China
81. Applying lean thinking in construction and performance improvement10.1016/j.aej.2013.04.008 ↗
82. Building information modelling (BIM) framework for practical implementation10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.010 ↗
83. Settlement analysis of the Mornos earth dam (Greece): Evidence from numerical modeling and geodetic monitoring10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.03.019 ↗
84. Indoor Navigation—User Requirements, State-of-the-Art and Developments for Smartphone Localization10.3390/geomatics3010001 ↗
85. (2025, September 26). Introduction to Operation Research. Available online: https://abdulkadir.blog.uma.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/sites/621/2020/01/Introduction-to-Operations-Research-Hillier-Lieberman.pdf.